I = 2 ππ scattering phase shift from the HAL QCD method with the LapH smearing

Daisuke Kawai, Sinya Aoki, Takumi Doi, Yoichi Ikeda, Takashi Inoue, Takumi Iritani, Noriyoshi Ishii, Takaya Miyamoto, Hidekatsu Nemura, Kenji Sasaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Physical observables, such as the scattering phase shifts and binding energy, calculated from the non-local HAL QCD potential do not depend on the sink operators used to define the potential. In practical applications, the derivative expansion of the non-local potential is employed, so that physical observables may receive some scheme dependence at a given order of the expansion. In this paper, we compare the I = 2 φφ scattering phase shifts obtained in the point-sink scheme (the standard scheme in the HAL QCD method) and the smeared-sink scheme (the LapH smearing newly introduced in the HAL QCD method). Although potentials in different schemes have different forms as expected, we find that, for reasonably small smearing size, the resultant scattering phase shifts agree with each other if the next-To-leading-order (NLO) term is taken into account. We also find that the HAL QCD potential in the point-sink scheme has a negligible NLO term for a wide range of energies, which implies good convergence of the derivative expansion, while the potential in the smeared-sink scheme has a non-negligible NLO contribution. The implications of this observation for future studies of resonance channels (such as the I = 0 and 1 φφ scatterings) with smeared all-To-All propagators are briefly discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number043B04
JournalProgress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics
Volume2018
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'I = 2 ππ scattering phase shift from the HAL QCD method with the LapH smearing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this