Impact of intermittent aerations on leachate quality and greenhouse gas reduction in the aerobic–anaerobic landfill method

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aerobic–anaerobic landfill method (AALM) is a novel approach in solid waste management that could shorten the landfill post-closure period and minimize the environmental loads. In this study, the aerobic–anaerobic landfill method was evaluated by using intermittent aeration. In addition, the nitrification–denitrification process was assessed as a means of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and improving the leachate quality during the degradation of the organic solid waste. The leachate quality and the gas composition in each of the reactors were measured during the experimental period (408 days). The aeration process entailed the injection of air into plexiglass cylinders (200 cm height × 10 cm diameter), filled with fresh organic solid waste collected from a composting plant. Different aeration routines were applied, namely, continuous aeration (aerobic reactor A), aeration for three days/week (aerobic–anaerobic reactor B), aeration for 6 h/day (aerobic–anaerobic reactor C), and no aeration (non-aerated reactor D). It was found that aerobic reactor A produced the best results in terms of reduction of GHGs and improvement of the leachate quality. The aerobic–anaerobic reactor C was found to be more effective than reactor B in respect of both the emission of GHGs and the leachate quality; moreover, compared with aerobic reactor A, energy costs were reduced by operating this reactor. The transition period phenomenon was investigated during an intensive seven-day experiment conducted on the discharged leachate obtained from aerobic–anaerobic reactors B and C. The experiment concerned the differences in the composition of the gas during the aeration and the non-aeration periods. It was found that the transition period between the aeration and non-aeration cycles, which followed the simultaneous nitrification–denitrification had a considerable effect on the leachate quality of both the reactors. The results indicated that AALM has the potential to reduce leachate pollutants and the emission of GHGs. Furthermore, the occurrence of simultaneous nitrification–denitrification presents the prospect that intermittent aeration could reduce landfill aftercare and energy costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-82
Number of pages12
JournalWaste Management
Volume55
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Waste Disposal Facilities
aeration
leachate
landfill
greenhouse gas
Gases
Solid Waste
solid waste
Waste Management
Costs and Cost Analysis
Aftercare
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Quality Improvement
reactor
method
Air
Injections
composting
gas
cost

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{ac3bb0f136594022b238dad9efd80175,
title = "Impact of intermittent aerations on leachate quality and greenhouse gas reduction in the aerobic–anaerobic landfill method",
abstract = "The aerobic–anaerobic landfill method (AALM) is a novel approach in solid waste management that could shorten the landfill post-closure period and minimize the environmental loads. In this study, the aerobic–anaerobic landfill method was evaluated by using intermittent aeration. In addition, the nitrification–denitrification process was assessed as a means of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and improving the leachate quality during the degradation of the organic solid waste. The leachate quality and the gas composition in each of the reactors were measured during the experimental period (408 days). The aeration process entailed the injection of air into plexiglass cylinders (200 cm height × 10 cm diameter), filled with fresh organic solid waste collected from a composting plant. Different aeration routines were applied, namely, continuous aeration (aerobic reactor A), aeration for three days/week (aerobic–anaerobic reactor B), aeration for 6 h/day (aerobic–anaerobic reactor C), and no aeration (non-aerated reactor D). It was found that aerobic reactor A produced the best results in terms of reduction of GHGs and improvement of the leachate quality. The aerobic–anaerobic reactor C was found to be more effective than reactor B in respect of both the emission of GHGs and the leachate quality; moreover, compared with aerobic reactor A, energy costs were reduced by operating this reactor. The transition period phenomenon was investigated during an intensive seven-day experiment conducted on the discharged leachate obtained from aerobic–anaerobic reactors B and C. The experiment concerned the differences in the composition of the gas during the aeration and the non-aeration periods. It was found that the transition period between the aeration and non-aeration cycles, which followed the simultaneous nitrification–denitrification had a considerable effect on the leachate quality of both the reactors. The results indicated that AALM has the potential to reduce leachate pollutants and the emission of GHGs. Furthermore, the occurrence of simultaneous nitrification–denitrification presents the prospect that intermittent aeration could reduce landfill aftercare and energy costs.",
author = "Mitali Nag and Takayuki Shimaoka and Teppei Komiya",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.018",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "71--82",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of intermittent aerations on leachate quality and greenhouse gas reduction in the aerobic–anaerobic landfill method

AU - Nag, Mitali

AU - Shimaoka, Takayuki

AU - Komiya, Teppei

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - The aerobic–anaerobic landfill method (AALM) is a novel approach in solid waste management that could shorten the landfill post-closure period and minimize the environmental loads. In this study, the aerobic–anaerobic landfill method was evaluated by using intermittent aeration. In addition, the nitrification–denitrification process was assessed as a means of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and improving the leachate quality during the degradation of the organic solid waste. The leachate quality and the gas composition in each of the reactors were measured during the experimental period (408 days). The aeration process entailed the injection of air into plexiglass cylinders (200 cm height × 10 cm diameter), filled with fresh organic solid waste collected from a composting plant. Different aeration routines were applied, namely, continuous aeration (aerobic reactor A), aeration for three days/week (aerobic–anaerobic reactor B), aeration for 6 h/day (aerobic–anaerobic reactor C), and no aeration (non-aerated reactor D). It was found that aerobic reactor A produced the best results in terms of reduction of GHGs and improvement of the leachate quality. The aerobic–anaerobic reactor C was found to be more effective than reactor B in respect of both the emission of GHGs and the leachate quality; moreover, compared with aerobic reactor A, energy costs were reduced by operating this reactor. The transition period phenomenon was investigated during an intensive seven-day experiment conducted on the discharged leachate obtained from aerobic–anaerobic reactors B and C. The experiment concerned the differences in the composition of the gas during the aeration and the non-aeration periods. It was found that the transition period between the aeration and non-aeration cycles, which followed the simultaneous nitrification–denitrification had a considerable effect on the leachate quality of both the reactors. The results indicated that AALM has the potential to reduce leachate pollutants and the emission of GHGs. Furthermore, the occurrence of simultaneous nitrification–denitrification presents the prospect that intermittent aeration could reduce landfill aftercare and energy costs.

AB - The aerobic–anaerobic landfill method (AALM) is a novel approach in solid waste management that could shorten the landfill post-closure period and minimize the environmental loads. In this study, the aerobic–anaerobic landfill method was evaluated by using intermittent aeration. In addition, the nitrification–denitrification process was assessed as a means of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and improving the leachate quality during the degradation of the organic solid waste. The leachate quality and the gas composition in each of the reactors were measured during the experimental period (408 days). The aeration process entailed the injection of air into plexiglass cylinders (200 cm height × 10 cm diameter), filled with fresh organic solid waste collected from a composting plant. Different aeration routines were applied, namely, continuous aeration (aerobic reactor A), aeration for three days/week (aerobic–anaerobic reactor B), aeration for 6 h/day (aerobic–anaerobic reactor C), and no aeration (non-aerated reactor D). It was found that aerobic reactor A produced the best results in terms of reduction of GHGs and improvement of the leachate quality. The aerobic–anaerobic reactor C was found to be more effective than reactor B in respect of both the emission of GHGs and the leachate quality; moreover, compared with aerobic reactor A, energy costs were reduced by operating this reactor. The transition period phenomenon was investigated during an intensive seven-day experiment conducted on the discharged leachate obtained from aerobic–anaerobic reactors B and C. The experiment concerned the differences in the composition of the gas during the aeration and the non-aeration periods. It was found that the transition period between the aeration and non-aeration cycles, which followed the simultaneous nitrification–denitrification had a considerable effect on the leachate quality of both the reactors. The results indicated that AALM has the potential to reduce leachate pollutants and the emission of GHGs. Furthermore, the occurrence of simultaneous nitrification–denitrification presents the prospect that intermittent aeration could reduce landfill aftercare and energy costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951065704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951065704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.018

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 26514311

AN - SCOPUS:84951065704

VL - 55

SP - 71

EP - 82

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

ER -