TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of surface contamination of implants with saliva during placement in augmented bone defects in sheep calvaria
AU - Jinno, Y.
AU - Jimbo, R.
AU - Hjalmarsson, J.
AU - Johansson, K.
AU - Stavropoulos, A.
AU - Becktor, J. P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Our aim was to try and find out whether contamination with saliva during insertion of dental implants affects osseointegration in bone that has been augmented with different grafts. Six bony defects were created in each of the calvaria of six sheep, and then augmented with three different materials (autogenous bone, bovine bone, and resorbable biphasic ceramic bone substitute) After five weeks of healing, three implants contaminated with saliva (contaminated group) and three not contaminated (uncontaminated group) were placed in the centre of the augmented areas. For histomorphometric analysis, bone implant contact, bone area fraction occupancy, bone and material area, and bony area were measured after a healing period of five weeks. There was a significant difference between the contaminated and uncontaminated groups (p = 0.036) for bone implant contact only in the augmented areas, but there were no significant differences in bone area fraction occupancy, bone and material area, and bony area. We conclude that contamination with saliva during placement of dental implants can significantly compromise bone implant contact in augmented areas, but had no significant effect on the formation of bone in areas more distant from the surface of the implant. We suggest that salivary contamination should be avoided during placement of dental implants in augmented areas.
AB - Our aim was to try and find out whether contamination with saliva during insertion of dental implants affects osseointegration in bone that has been augmented with different grafts. Six bony defects were created in each of the calvaria of six sheep, and then augmented with three different materials (autogenous bone, bovine bone, and resorbable biphasic ceramic bone substitute) After five weeks of healing, three implants contaminated with saliva (contaminated group) and three not contaminated (uncontaminated group) were placed in the centre of the augmented areas. For histomorphometric analysis, bone implant contact, bone area fraction occupancy, bone and material area, and bony area were measured after a healing period of five weeks. There was a significant difference between the contaminated and uncontaminated groups (p = 0.036) for bone implant contact only in the augmented areas, but there were no significant differences in bone area fraction occupancy, bone and material area, and bony area. We conclude that contamination with saliva during placement of dental implants can significantly compromise bone implant contact in augmented areas, but had no significant effect on the formation of bone in areas more distant from the surface of the implant. We suggest that salivary contamination should be avoided during placement of dental implants in augmented areas.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059429382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059429382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.11.014
DO - 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.11.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 30612838
AN - SCOPUS:85059429382
SN - 0266-4356
VL - 57
SP - 41
EP - 46
JO - British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 1
ER -