Increase in carbon prices: analysis of energy-economy modeling

Kazushi Hatase, Shunsuke Managi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the mechanisms of social cost of carbon (SCC) and marginal abatement cost (MAC) in climate change modeling. To examine these mechanisms, we observed the shifts in the marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) curves of carbon dioxide (CO2) abatement when parameter values are changed. In the observation, we used the DICE model proposed by Nordhaus (A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008) changing 24 parameters for the observation. In consequent, firstly, we have found that discount rate is not only one of the parameters which significantly raise the carbon price, that is, other parameters may have significant impact too. Secondly, we have found that there are two patterns in the rise of the SCC, and three patterns in the rise of the MAC. Thirdly, we have found that the difference between the rise of the SCC and MAC is primarily caused by the horizontal MB curve in CO2 emissions reduction; an upward shift of MC curve raises MAC but never raises the SCC. Thus, the choice of the SCC or MAC may make the change of carbon price different, affecting global warming policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-262
Number of pages22
JournalEnvironmental Economics and Policy Studies
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

abatement cost
carbon
modeling
energy
global warming
discount rate
analysis
economy
price
Marginal abatement costs
Social costs
Carbon
Carbon price
Modeling
Energy
cost
carbon dioxide
social cost
climate change
parameter

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Increase in carbon prices : analysis of energy-economy modeling. / Hatase, Kazushi; Managi, Shunsuke.

In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.04.2015, p. 241-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a70091a83b1f437c866bc0063183a6c7,
title = "Increase in carbon prices: analysis of energy-economy modeling",
abstract = "This study examines the mechanisms of social cost of carbon (SCC) and marginal abatement cost (MAC) in climate change modeling. To examine these mechanisms, we observed the shifts in the marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) curves of carbon dioxide (CO2) abatement when parameter values are changed. In the observation, we used the DICE model proposed by Nordhaus (A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008) changing 24 parameters for the observation. In consequent, firstly, we have found that discount rate is not only one of the parameters which significantly raise the carbon price, that is, other parameters may have significant impact too. Secondly, we have found that there are two patterns in the rise of the SCC, and three patterns in the rise of the MAC. Thirdly, we have found that the difference between the rise of the SCC and MAC is primarily caused by the horizontal MB curve in CO2 emissions reduction; an upward shift of MC curve raises MAC but never raises the SCC. Thus, the choice of the SCC or MAC may make the change of carbon price different, affecting global warming policy.",
author = "Kazushi Hatase and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10018-014-0101-2",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "241--262",
journal = "Environmental Economics and Policy Studies",
issn = "1432-847X",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increase in carbon prices

T2 - analysis of energy-economy modeling

AU - Hatase, Kazushi

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - This study examines the mechanisms of social cost of carbon (SCC) and marginal abatement cost (MAC) in climate change modeling. To examine these mechanisms, we observed the shifts in the marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) curves of carbon dioxide (CO2) abatement when parameter values are changed. In the observation, we used the DICE model proposed by Nordhaus (A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008) changing 24 parameters for the observation. In consequent, firstly, we have found that discount rate is not only one of the parameters which significantly raise the carbon price, that is, other parameters may have significant impact too. Secondly, we have found that there are two patterns in the rise of the SCC, and three patterns in the rise of the MAC. Thirdly, we have found that the difference between the rise of the SCC and MAC is primarily caused by the horizontal MB curve in CO2 emissions reduction; an upward shift of MC curve raises MAC but never raises the SCC. Thus, the choice of the SCC or MAC may make the change of carbon price different, affecting global warming policy.

AB - This study examines the mechanisms of social cost of carbon (SCC) and marginal abatement cost (MAC) in climate change modeling. To examine these mechanisms, we observed the shifts in the marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) curves of carbon dioxide (CO2) abatement when parameter values are changed. In the observation, we used the DICE model proposed by Nordhaus (A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008) changing 24 parameters for the observation. In consequent, firstly, we have found that discount rate is not only one of the parameters which significantly raise the carbon price, that is, other parameters may have significant impact too. Secondly, we have found that there are two patterns in the rise of the SCC, and three patterns in the rise of the MAC. Thirdly, we have found that the difference between the rise of the SCC and MAC is primarily caused by the horizontal MB curve in CO2 emissions reduction; an upward shift of MC curve raises MAC but never raises the SCC. Thus, the choice of the SCC or MAC may make the change of carbon price different, affecting global warming policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925946340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925946340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10018-014-0101-2

DO - 10.1007/s10018-014-0101-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925946340

VL - 17

SP - 241

EP - 262

JO - Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

JF - Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

SN - 1432-847X

IS - 2

ER -