TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of estrogen treatment on esr1+ and esr1− cells in er+ breast cancer
T2 - Insights from single-cell analysis of patient-derived xenograft models
AU - Mori, Hitomi
AU - Saeki, Kohei
AU - Chang, Gregory
AU - Wang, Jinhui
AU - Wu, Xiwei
AU - Hsu, Pei Yin
AU - Kanaya, Noriko
AU - Wang, Xiaoqiang
AU - Somlo, George
AU - Nakamura, Masafumi
AU - Bild, Andrea
AU - Chen, Shiuan
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: H.M. was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI JP18J20301, JSPS KAKENHI JP21K15571). This research was supported by the Lester M. and Irene C. Finkelstein endowment (S.C.), NIH U01ES026137 (S.C.), a pilot grant from the City of Hope Center for Cancer and Aging (S.C.), and a pilot grant through NIH U54CA209978 (A.B.).
Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: H.M. received an SABCS Basic Science Scholar Award supported by the 43rd San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2020, for her presentation on this research. We thank the City of Hope Integrative Genomics Core, Pathology Research Service Core, and Animal Resource Core, which are supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30CA033572, for their excellent technical support. We appreciate the assistance of Min-Hsuan and Charles Warden for processing bulk RNA-Seq and scRNA-Seq data. In addition, we thank Desiree Ha for editing our manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - A 100% ER positivity is not required for an endocrine therapy response. Furthermore, while estrogen typically promotes the progression of hormone-dependent breast cancer via the activation of estrogen receptor (ER)-α, estrogen-induced tumor suppression in ER+ breast cancer has been clinically observed. With the success in establishing estrogen-stimulated (SC31) and estrogen-suppressed (GS3) patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis was performed to determine the impact of estrogen on ESR1+ and ESR1– tumor cells. We found that 17β-estradiol (E2)-induced suppression of GS3 transpired through wild-type and unamplified ERα. E2 upregulated the expression of estrogen-dependent genes in both SC31 and GS3; however, E2 induced cell cycle advance in SC31, while it resulted in cell cycle arrest in GS3. Importantly, these gene expression changes occurred in both ESR1+ and ESR1– cells within the same breast tumors, demonstrating for the first time a differential effect of estrogen on ESR1– cells. E2 also upregulated a tumor-suppressor gene, IL-24, in GS3. The apoptosis gene set was upregulated and the G2M checkpoint gene set was downregulated in most IL-24+ cells after E2 treatment. In summary, estrogen affected pathologically defined ER+ tumors differently, influencing both ESR1+ and ESR1– cells. Our results also suggest IL-24 to be a potential marker of estrogen-suppressed tumors.
AB - A 100% ER positivity is not required for an endocrine therapy response. Furthermore, while estrogen typically promotes the progression of hormone-dependent breast cancer via the activation of estrogen receptor (ER)-α, estrogen-induced tumor suppression in ER+ breast cancer has been clinically observed. With the success in establishing estrogen-stimulated (SC31) and estrogen-suppressed (GS3) patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis was performed to determine the impact of estrogen on ESR1+ and ESR1– tumor cells. We found that 17β-estradiol (E2)-induced suppression of GS3 transpired through wild-type and unamplified ERα. E2 upregulated the expression of estrogen-dependent genes in both SC31 and GS3; however, E2 induced cell cycle advance in SC31, while it resulted in cell cycle arrest in GS3. Importantly, these gene expression changes occurred in both ESR1+ and ESR1– cells within the same breast tumors, demonstrating for the first time a differential effect of estrogen on ESR1– cells. E2 also upregulated a tumor-suppressor gene, IL-24, in GS3. The apoptosis gene set was upregulated and the G2M checkpoint gene set was downregulated in most IL-24+ cells after E2 treatment. In summary, estrogen affected pathologically defined ER+ tumors differently, influencing both ESR1+ and ESR1– cells. Our results also suggest IL-24 to be a potential marker of estrogen-suppressed tumors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121289372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121289372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers13246375
DO - 10.3390/cancers13246375
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121289372
VL - 13
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
SN - 2072-6694
IS - 24
M1 - 6375
ER -