Influence of operations on leachate characteristics in the Aerobic-Anaerobic Landfill Method

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Landfill aeration is an effective technique for the controlled and sustainable conversion of conventional anaerobic landfills into a biologically stabilized state associated with a significantly lowered or the near elimination of the landfill gas emission potential. For in-situ leachate treatment recycling back the generated leachate in the bioreactor is also a promising technique for reducing pollutants and cost of ex-situ treatment as well. This research has been conducted to ascertain the in-situ treatment of leachate in Aerobic Anaerobic Landfill Method (AALM) compared with aerobic landfill and evaluated the impacts of various leachate recirculation regimes on MSW degradation and to provide data for successful operation in landfill sites. The experiment was conducted using six Plexiglass® landfill simulation reactors with a height of 100 cm and a diameter of 15 cm. Air was injected at the rates of 1.6 l/kg DM/h (Low aeration rate) for reactors R-LA, R-LAA (recirculatory) and LAA (non-recirculatory) and 4.8 l/kg DM/h (High aeration rate) in R-HA, R-HAA (recirculatory), and HAA (non-recirculatory) until day 242. It has been evaluated that R-HAA at high aeration rate achieved higher leachate quantity reduction (36.9%) than low aeration rate reactor R-LAA (19.6%) and AALM provides a better solution to control the temperature within the landfill body. The final NH4 +-N concentration in R-HA (214.5 mg/l) was eight times lower than in the R-LA (1741.0 mg/l) reactor, and R-HAA (842.5 mg/l) was about three times lower than R-LAA (2315.4 mg/l) reactor on day 242. The change in leachate recirculation amount at varying moisture content positively affected the stabilization process and in-situ leachate treatment efficiency. The combination of both technologies (intermittent aeration and leachate recirculation) is a feasible way for in-situ leachate treatment, decrease the cost of further ex-situ leachate treatment as well as a viable and cost-saving alternative to continuous aeration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)698-707
Number of pages10
JournalWaste Management
Volume78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

leachate
landfill
aeration
method
cost
bioreactor
moisture content
stabilization
recycling
reactor
rate
degradation
in situ
pollutant
air
simulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Influence of operations on leachate characteristics in the Aerobic-Anaerobic Landfill Method. / Nag, Mitali; Shimaoka, Takayuki; Komiya, Teppei.

In: Waste Management, Vol. 78, 01.08.2018, p. 698-707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b9684341ac54bd88639a36267bef8ec,
title = "Influence of operations on leachate characteristics in the Aerobic-Anaerobic Landfill Method",
abstract = "Landfill aeration is an effective technique for the controlled and sustainable conversion of conventional anaerobic landfills into a biologically stabilized state associated with a significantly lowered or the near elimination of the landfill gas emission potential. For in-situ leachate treatment recycling back the generated leachate in the bioreactor is also a promising technique for reducing pollutants and cost of ex-situ treatment as well. This research has been conducted to ascertain the in-situ treatment of leachate in Aerobic Anaerobic Landfill Method (AALM) compared with aerobic landfill and evaluated the impacts of various leachate recirculation regimes on MSW degradation and to provide data for successful operation in landfill sites. The experiment was conducted using six Plexiglass{\circledR} landfill simulation reactors with a height of 100 cm and a diameter of 15 cm. Air was injected at the rates of 1.6 l/kg DM/h (Low aeration rate) for reactors R-LA, R-LAA (recirculatory) and LAA (non-recirculatory) and 4.8 l/kg DM/h (High aeration rate) in R-HA, R-HAA (recirculatory), and HAA (non-recirculatory) until day 242. It has been evaluated that R-HAA at high aeration rate achieved higher leachate quantity reduction (36.9{\%}) than low aeration rate reactor R-LAA (19.6{\%}) and AALM provides a better solution to control the temperature within the landfill body. The final NH4 +-N concentration in R-HA (214.5 mg/l) was eight times lower than in the R-LA (1741.0 mg/l) reactor, and R-HAA (842.5 mg/l) was about three times lower than R-LAA (2315.4 mg/l) reactor on day 242. The change in leachate recirculation amount at varying moisture content positively affected the stabilization process and in-situ leachate treatment efficiency. The combination of both technologies (intermittent aeration and leachate recirculation) is a feasible way for in-situ leachate treatment, decrease the cost of further ex-situ leachate treatment as well as a viable and cost-saving alternative to continuous aeration.",
author = "Mitali Nag and Takayuki Shimaoka and Teppei Komiya",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.044",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "698--707",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of operations on leachate characteristics in the Aerobic-Anaerobic Landfill Method

AU - Nag, Mitali

AU - Shimaoka, Takayuki

AU - Komiya, Teppei

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Landfill aeration is an effective technique for the controlled and sustainable conversion of conventional anaerobic landfills into a biologically stabilized state associated with a significantly lowered or the near elimination of the landfill gas emission potential. For in-situ leachate treatment recycling back the generated leachate in the bioreactor is also a promising technique for reducing pollutants and cost of ex-situ treatment as well. This research has been conducted to ascertain the in-situ treatment of leachate in Aerobic Anaerobic Landfill Method (AALM) compared with aerobic landfill and evaluated the impacts of various leachate recirculation regimes on MSW degradation and to provide data for successful operation in landfill sites. The experiment was conducted using six Plexiglass® landfill simulation reactors with a height of 100 cm and a diameter of 15 cm. Air was injected at the rates of 1.6 l/kg DM/h (Low aeration rate) for reactors R-LA, R-LAA (recirculatory) and LAA (non-recirculatory) and 4.8 l/kg DM/h (High aeration rate) in R-HA, R-HAA (recirculatory), and HAA (non-recirculatory) until day 242. It has been evaluated that R-HAA at high aeration rate achieved higher leachate quantity reduction (36.9%) than low aeration rate reactor R-LAA (19.6%) and AALM provides a better solution to control the temperature within the landfill body. The final NH4 +-N concentration in R-HA (214.5 mg/l) was eight times lower than in the R-LA (1741.0 mg/l) reactor, and R-HAA (842.5 mg/l) was about three times lower than R-LAA (2315.4 mg/l) reactor on day 242. The change in leachate recirculation amount at varying moisture content positively affected the stabilization process and in-situ leachate treatment efficiency. The combination of both technologies (intermittent aeration and leachate recirculation) is a feasible way for in-situ leachate treatment, decrease the cost of further ex-situ leachate treatment as well as a viable and cost-saving alternative to continuous aeration.

AB - Landfill aeration is an effective technique for the controlled and sustainable conversion of conventional anaerobic landfills into a biologically stabilized state associated with a significantly lowered or the near elimination of the landfill gas emission potential. For in-situ leachate treatment recycling back the generated leachate in the bioreactor is also a promising technique for reducing pollutants and cost of ex-situ treatment as well. This research has been conducted to ascertain the in-situ treatment of leachate in Aerobic Anaerobic Landfill Method (AALM) compared with aerobic landfill and evaluated the impacts of various leachate recirculation regimes on MSW degradation and to provide data for successful operation in landfill sites. The experiment was conducted using six Plexiglass® landfill simulation reactors with a height of 100 cm and a diameter of 15 cm. Air was injected at the rates of 1.6 l/kg DM/h (Low aeration rate) for reactors R-LA, R-LAA (recirculatory) and LAA (non-recirculatory) and 4.8 l/kg DM/h (High aeration rate) in R-HA, R-HAA (recirculatory), and HAA (non-recirculatory) until day 242. It has been evaluated that R-HAA at high aeration rate achieved higher leachate quantity reduction (36.9%) than low aeration rate reactor R-LAA (19.6%) and AALM provides a better solution to control the temperature within the landfill body. The final NH4 +-N concentration in R-HA (214.5 mg/l) was eight times lower than in the R-LA (1741.0 mg/l) reactor, and R-HAA (842.5 mg/l) was about three times lower than R-LAA (2315.4 mg/l) reactor on day 242. The change in leachate recirculation amount at varying moisture content positively affected the stabilization process and in-situ leachate treatment efficiency. The combination of both technologies (intermittent aeration and leachate recirculation) is a feasible way for in-situ leachate treatment, decrease the cost of further ex-situ leachate treatment as well as a viable and cost-saving alternative to continuous aeration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049108359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049108359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.044

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.044

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049108359

VL - 78

SP - 698

EP - 707

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

ER -