Infrequent physician use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators risks patient safety

Leonard Lyman Stephen, Art Sedrakyan, Huong Do, Renee Razzano, Alvin I. Mushlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have diffused rapidly into clinical practice with little evaluation of their real-world effectiveness. Objectives: To determine the effect of the adoption of ICD on patient safety, particularly with respect to physician volume and early outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort of all ICD implantations in New York state from 1997 to 2006, with follow-up at 90 days and 1 year. Setting: New York state non-federal hospital discharges in which an ICD was implanted during the admission. Patients were followed forward for 1 year for subsequent admissions. Patients: New York state residents undergoing ICD implantation. Main outcome measures: Effects of annual and career ICD implantation volume on 90-day complication, readmission, reprogramming, mortality and revision of the ICD within 1 year. Results: This cohort (N=38 992) represents a period of rapid adoption and implementation of this new technology, with frequency more than tripling between 1997 and 2006. We identified 6439 (16.5%) postimplantation complications and 1093 (2.8%) deaths within 90 days of implantation. The majority (73.4%) of physicians implanted one or fewer ICDs per year, and 11.0% of all implantations were performed by these very-low-volume operators. Patients treated by very-lowvolume operators were more likely to die (RR=1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.4) or experience cardiac complications (RR=4.7, 95% CI 3.3 to 6.8) even after the adjustment for case mix compared to operators who frequently performed ICD implantation. Conclusions: These findings suggest a need for safe and effective implementation strategies for new medical technologies, which minimize patient risk due to rapid diffusion among inexperienced providers and assure that the intended benefit can be maximised rapidly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1655-1660
Number of pages6
JournalHeart
Volume97
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Patient Safety
Physicians
Technology
Risk Adjustment
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Mortality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Infrequent physician use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators risks patient safety. / Lyman Stephen, Leonard; Sedrakyan, Art; Do, Huong; Razzano, Renee; Mushlin, Alvin I.

In: Heart, Vol. 97, No. 20, 01.10.2011, p. 1655-1660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lyman Stephen, Leonard ; Sedrakyan, Art ; Do, Huong ; Razzano, Renee ; Mushlin, Alvin I. / Infrequent physician use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators risks patient safety. In: Heart. 2011 ; Vol. 97, No. 20. pp. 1655-1660.
@article{0d8bfc72605d4ee5b9c072303f03677d,
title = "Infrequent physician use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators risks patient safety",
abstract = "Context: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have diffused rapidly into clinical practice with little evaluation of their real-world effectiveness. Objectives: To determine the effect of the adoption of ICD on patient safety, particularly with respect to physician volume and early outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort of all ICD implantations in New York state from 1997 to 2006, with follow-up at 90 days and 1 year. Setting: New York state non-federal hospital discharges in which an ICD was implanted during the admission. Patients were followed forward for 1 year for subsequent admissions. Patients: New York state residents undergoing ICD implantation. Main outcome measures: Effects of annual and career ICD implantation volume on 90-day complication, readmission, reprogramming, mortality and revision of the ICD within 1 year. Results: This cohort (N=38 992) represents a period of rapid adoption and implementation of this new technology, with frequency more than tripling between 1997 and 2006. We identified 6439 (16.5{\%}) postimplantation complications and 1093 (2.8{\%}) deaths within 90 days of implantation. The majority (73.4{\%}) of physicians implanted one or fewer ICDs per year, and 11.0{\%} of all implantations were performed by these very-low-volume operators. Patients treated by very-lowvolume operators were more likely to die (RR=1.8, 95{\%} CI 1.3 to 2.4) or experience cardiac complications (RR=4.7, 95{\%} CI 3.3 to 6.8) even after the adjustment for case mix compared to operators who frequently performed ICD implantation. Conclusions: These findings suggest a need for safe and effective implementation strategies for new medical technologies, which minimize patient risk due to rapid diffusion among inexperienced providers and assure that the intended benefit can be maximised rapidly.",
author = "{Lyman Stephen}, Leonard and Art Sedrakyan and Huong Do and Renee Razzano and Mushlin, {Alvin I.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/hrt.2011.226282",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "1655--1660",
journal = "Heart",
issn = "1355-6037",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infrequent physician use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators risks patient safety

AU - Lyman Stephen, Leonard

AU - Sedrakyan, Art

AU - Do, Huong

AU - Razzano, Renee

AU - Mushlin, Alvin I.

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Context: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have diffused rapidly into clinical practice with little evaluation of their real-world effectiveness. Objectives: To determine the effect of the adoption of ICD on patient safety, particularly with respect to physician volume and early outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort of all ICD implantations in New York state from 1997 to 2006, with follow-up at 90 days and 1 year. Setting: New York state non-federal hospital discharges in which an ICD was implanted during the admission. Patients were followed forward for 1 year for subsequent admissions. Patients: New York state residents undergoing ICD implantation. Main outcome measures: Effects of annual and career ICD implantation volume on 90-day complication, readmission, reprogramming, mortality and revision of the ICD within 1 year. Results: This cohort (N=38 992) represents a period of rapid adoption and implementation of this new technology, with frequency more than tripling between 1997 and 2006. We identified 6439 (16.5%) postimplantation complications and 1093 (2.8%) deaths within 90 days of implantation. The majority (73.4%) of physicians implanted one or fewer ICDs per year, and 11.0% of all implantations were performed by these very-low-volume operators. Patients treated by very-lowvolume operators were more likely to die (RR=1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.4) or experience cardiac complications (RR=4.7, 95% CI 3.3 to 6.8) even after the adjustment for case mix compared to operators who frequently performed ICD implantation. Conclusions: These findings suggest a need for safe and effective implementation strategies for new medical technologies, which minimize patient risk due to rapid diffusion among inexperienced providers and assure that the intended benefit can be maximised rapidly.

AB - Context: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have diffused rapidly into clinical practice with little evaluation of their real-world effectiveness. Objectives: To determine the effect of the adoption of ICD on patient safety, particularly with respect to physician volume and early outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort of all ICD implantations in New York state from 1997 to 2006, with follow-up at 90 days and 1 year. Setting: New York state non-federal hospital discharges in which an ICD was implanted during the admission. Patients were followed forward for 1 year for subsequent admissions. Patients: New York state residents undergoing ICD implantation. Main outcome measures: Effects of annual and career ICD implantation volume on 90-day complication, readmission, reprogramming, mortality and revision of the ICD within 1 year. Results: This cohort (N=38 992) represents a period of rapid adoption and implementation of this new technology, with frequency more than tripling between 1997 and 2006. We identified 6439 (16.5%) postimplantation complications and 1093 (2.8%) deaths within 90 days of implantation. The majority (73.4%) of physicians implanted one or fewer ICDs per year, and 11.0% of all implantations were performed by these very-low-volume operators. Patients treated by very-lowvolume operators were more likely to die (RR=1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.4) or experience cardiac complications (RR=4.7, 95% CI 3.3 to 6.8) even after the adjustment for case mix compared to operators who frequently performed ICD implantation. Conclusions: These findings suggest a need for safe and effective implementation strategies for new medical technologies, which minimize patient risk due to rapid diffusion among inexperienced providers and assure that the intended benefit can be maximised rapidly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053185106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053185106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/hrt.2011.226282

DO - 10.1136/hrt.2011.226282

M3 - Article

C2 - 21795298

AN - SCOPUS:80053185106

VL - 97

SP - 1655

EP - 1660

JO - Heart

JF - Heart

SN - 1355-6037

IS - 20

ER -