Intensity and frequency resolution: Masking of absolute identification and fixed and roving discrimination

Shuji Mori, Lawrence M. Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Auditory intensity and frequency resolution were studied in three paradigms under masking conditions. Absolute identifications of single stimuli (one-interval paradigm) and 2IFC judgments of fixed- and roving-level pairs of stimuli (two-interval paradigm) were obtained from the same experienced observers. Judgments were made under optimal (no mask) conditions, in the presence of a broadband noise mask (simultaneous mask), and when the stimulus(i) to be judged were either preceded (forward mask) or followed (backward mask) by a broadband noise mask. Substantial masking of intensity resolution was found in all mask conditions. Only a simultaneous mask affected frequency resolution. In the no mask condition, performance was best for fixed-level (or frequency) 2IFC discrimination, followed by roving-level (frequency) 2IFC, and finally absolute identification. These differences were maintained under masking for frequency resolution, but not for intensity resolution. The results are discussed in terms of the Braida and Durlach (1988) model of intensity resolution. A similar model is suggested for frequency resolution with differences suggested by the differences in neural coding of sound intensity and frequency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-255
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume91
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

rovings
masking
discrimination
masks
stimuli
broadband
intervals
Masking
Discrimination
Mask
sound intensity
acoustic frequencies
coding

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Intensity and frequency resolution : Masking of absolute identification and fixed and roving discrimination. / Mori, Shuji; Ward, Lawrence M.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 91, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 246-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c2f373f7d8d483b92f2d509dd0ee71c,
title = "Intensity and frequency resolution: Masking of absolute identification and fixed and roving discrimination",
abstract = "Auditory intensity and frequency resolution were studied in three paradigms under masking conditions. Absolute identifications of single stimuli (one-interval paradigm) and 2IFC judgments of fixed- and roving-level pairs of stimuli (two-interval paradigm) were obtained from the same experienced observers. Judgments were made under optimal (no mask) conditions, in the presence of a broadband noise mask (simultaneous mask), and when the stimulus(i) to be judged were either preceded (forward mask) or followed (backward mask) by a broadband noise mask. Substantial masking of intensity resolution was found in all mask conditions. Only a simultaneous mask affected frequency resolution. In the no mask condition, performance was best for fixed-level (or frequency) 2IFC discrimination, followed by roving-level (frequency) 2IFC, and finally absolute identification. These differences were maintained under masking for frequency resolution, but not for intensity resolution. The results are discussed in terms of the Braida and Durlach (1988) model of intensity resolution. A similar model is suggested for frequency resolution with differences suggested by the differences in neural coding of sound intensity and frequency.",
author = "Shuji Mori and Ward, {Lawrence M.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.402768",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "246--255",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intensity and frequency resolution

T2 - Masking of absolute identification and fixed and roving discrimination

AU - Mori, Shuji

AU - Ward, Lawrence M.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Auditory intensity and frequency resolution were studied in three paradigms under masking conditions. Absolute identifications of single stimuli (one-interval paradigm) and 2IFC judgments of fixed- and roving-level pairs of stimuli (two-interval paradigm) were obtained from the same experienced observers. Judgments were made under optimal (no mask) conditions, in the presence of a broadband noise mask (simultaneous mask), and when the stimulus(i) to be judged were either preceded (forward mask) or followed (backward mask) by a broadband noise mask. Substantial masking of intensity resolution was found in all mask conditions. Only a simultaneous mask affected frequency resolution. In the no mask condition, performance was best for fixed-level (or frequency) 2IFC discrimination, followed by roving-level (frequency) 2IFC, and finally absolute identification. These differences were maintained under masking for frequency resolution, but not for intensity resolution. The results are discussed in terms of the Braida and Durlach (1988) model of intensity resolution. A similar model is suggested for frequency resolution with differences suggested by the differences in neural coding of sound intensity and frequency.

AB - Auditory intensity and frequency resolution were studied in three paradigms under masking conditions. Absolute identifications of single stimuli (one-interval paradigm) and 2IFC judgments of fixed- and roving-level pairs of stimuli (two-interval paradigm) were obtained from the same experienced observers. Judgments were made under optimal (no mask) conditions, in the presence of a broadband noise mask (simultaneous mask), and when the stimulus(i) to be judged were either preceded (forward mask) or followed (backward mask) by a broadband noise mask. Substantial masking of intensity resolution was found in all mask conditions. Only a simultaneous mask affected frequency resolution. In the no mask condition, performance was best for fixed-level (or frequency) 2IFC discrimination, followed by roving-level (frequency) 2IFC, and finally absolute identification. These differences were maintained under masking for frequency resolution, but not for intensity resolution. The results are discussed in terms of the Braida and Durlach (1988) model of intensity resolution. A similar model is suggested for frequency resolution with differences suggested by the differences in neural coding of sound intensity and frequency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026632830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026632830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.402768

DO - 10.1121/1.402768

M3 - Article

C2 - 1737875

AN - SCOPUS:0026632830

VL - 91

SP - 246

EP - 255

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 1

ER -