Interaction between valence of empathy and familiarity: Is it difficult to empathize with the positive events of a stranger?

Yuki Motomura, Akira Takeshita, Yuka Egashira, Takayuki Nishimura, Yeon kyu Kim, Shigeki Watanuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Empathy in humans is thought to have evolved via social interactions caused by the formation of social groups. Considering the role of empathy within a social group, there might be a difference between emotional empathy for strangers and familiar others belonging to the same social group. In this study, we used the global field power (GFP) index to investigate empathic brain activity during observation of a cue indicating either a negative or positive image viewed by a stranger or close friend. Methods: Sixteen healthy participants observed a partner performing an emotional gambling task displayed on a monitor. After the partner's choice-response, a frowning or smiling face symbol was simultaneously presented to the participant's monitor while a negative or positive emotional image was presented to the partner's monitor. All participants observed a control condition (CT) showing a computer trial, a stranger-observation condition (SO) showing the trial of a stranger, and a friend-observation condition (FO) to observe the trial of a close friend. During these observations, participants' event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to calculate GFP, and after the task, a subjective assessment of their feelings was measured. Results: Positive emotion was significantly larger under the FO compared to the CT and the SO. Significantly larger negative emotion was found under the SO and FO compared to the CT. In response to a positive cue, significantly larger GFP during 300 to 600 ms was observed under the FO compared to the CT and SO. In response to a negative cue, significantly larger GFP was observed under the FO and SO compared to the CT. A significantly larger GFP under the SO was found in response to only a negative cue. Topographic map analysis suggested that these differences were related to frontal-occipital dynamics. GFP was significantly correlated with empathic trait. Conclusion: These results revealed that familiarity with another person has different effects depending on the valence of empathy. Negative empathy, including the danger perception function, might easily occur even among strangers, whereas positive empathy related to nursing and supporting an inner group does not happen easily with strangers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13
JournalJournal of physiological anthropology
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 22 2015

Fingerprint

Nursing
empathy
Brain
Observation
event
interaction
Cues
Emotions
Recognition (Psychology)
emotion
Smiling
Gambling
gambling
Interpersonal Relations
participant observation
Evoked Potentials
Power (Psychology)
symbol
Healthy Volunteers
brain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physiology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Anthropology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Interaction between valence of empathy and familiarity : Is it difficult to empathize with the positive events of a stranger? / Motomura, Yuki; Takeshita, Akira; Egashira, Yuka; Nishimura, Takayuki; Kim, Yeon kyu; Watanuki, Shigeki.

In: Journal of physiological anthropology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 13, 22.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5cf09b3dc529416f8f0015eada909a0f,
title = "Interaction between valence of empathy and familiarity: Is it difficult to empathize with the positive events of a stranger?",
abstract = "Background: Empathy in humans is thought to have evolved via social interactions caused by the formation of social groups. Considering the role of empathy within a social group, there might be a difference between emotional empathy for strangers and familiar others belonging to the same social group. In this study, we used the global field power (GFP) index to investigate empathic brain activity during observation of a cue indicating either a negative or positive image viewed by a stranger or close friend. Methods: Sixteen healthy participants observed a partner performing an emotional gambling task displayed on a monitor. After the partner's choice-response, a frowning or smiling face symbol was simultaneously presented to the participant's monitor while a negative or positive emotional image was presented to the partner's monitor. All participants observed a control condition (CT) showing a computer trial, a stranger-observation condition (SO) showing the trial of a stranger, and a friend-observation condition (FO) to observe the trial of a close friend. During these observations, participants' event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to calculate GFP, and after the task, a subjective assessment of their feelings was measured. Results: Positive emotion was significantly larger under the FO compared to the CT and the SO. Significantly larger negative emotion was found under the SO and FO compared to the CT. In response to a positive cue, significantly larger GFP during 300 to 600 ms was observed under the FO compared to the CT and SO. In response to a negative cue, significantly larger GFP was observed under the FO and SO compared to the CT. A significantly larger GFP under the SO was found in response to only a negative cue. Topographic map analysis suggested that these differences were related to frontal-occipital dynamics. GFP was significantly correlated with empathic trait. Conclusion: These results revealed that familiarity with another person has different effects depending on the valence of empathy. Negative empathy, including the danger perception function, might easily occur even among strangers, whereas positive empathy related to nursing and supporting an inner group does not happen easily with strangers.",
author = "Yuki Motomura and Akira Takeshita and Yuka Egashira and Takayuki Nishimura and Kim, {Yeon kyu} and Shigeki Watanuki",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/s40101-015-0049-3",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
journal = "Journal of Physiological Anthropology",
issn = "1880-6791",
publisher = "Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction between valence of empathy and familiarity

T2 - Is it difficult to empathize with the positive events of a stranger?

AU - Motomura, Yuki

AU - Takeshita, Akira

AU - Egashira, Yuka

AU - Nishimura, Takayuki

AU - Kim, Yeon kyu

AU - Watanuki, Shigeki

PY - 2015/3/22

Y1 - 2015/3/22

N2 - Background: Empathy in humans is thought to have evolved via social interactions caused by the formation of social groups. Considering the role of empathy within a social group, there might be a difference between emotional empathy for strangers and familiar others belonging to the same social group. In this study, we used the global field power (GFP) index to investigate empathic brain activity during observation of a cue indicating either a negative or positive image viewed by a stranger or close friend. Methods: Sixteen healthy participants observed a partner performing an emotional gambling task displayed on a monitor. After the partner's choice-response, a frowning or smiling face symbol was simultaneously presented to the participant's monitor while a negative or positive emotional image was presented to the partner's monitor. All participants observed a control condition (CT) showing a computer trial, a stranger-observation condition (SO) showing the trial of a stranger, and a friend-observation condition (FO) to observe the trial of a close friend. During these observations, participants' event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to calculate GFP, and after the task, a subjective assessment of their feelings was measured. Results: Positive emotion was significantly larger under the FO compared to the CT and the SO. Significantly larger negative emotion was found under the SO and FO compared to the CT. In response to a positive cue, significantly larger GFP during 300 to 600 ms was observed under the FO compared to the CT and SO. In response to a negative cue, significantly larger GFP was observed under the FO and SO compared to the CT. A significantly larger GFP under the SO was found in response to only a negative cue. Topographic map analysis suggested that these differences were related to frontal-occipital dynamics. GFP was significantly correlated with empathic trait. Conclusion: These results revealed that familiarity with another person has different effects depending on the valence of empathy. Negative empathy, including the danger perception function, might easily occur even among strangers, whereas positive empathy related to nursing and supporting an inner group does not happen easily with strangers.

AB - Background: Empathy in humans is thought to have evolved via social interactions caused by the formation of social groups. Considering the role of empathy within a social group, there might be a difference between emotional empathy for strangers and familiar others belonging to the same social group. In this study, we used the global field power (GFP) index to investigate empathic brain activity during observation of a cue indicating either a negative or positive image viewed by a stranger or close friend. Methods: Sixteen healthy participants observed a partner performing an emotional gambling task displayed on a monitor. After the partner's choice-response, a frowning or smiling face symbol was simultaneously presented to the participant's monitor while a negative or positive emotional image was presented to the partner's monitor. All participants observed a control condition (CT) showing a computer trial, a stranger-observation condition (SO) showing the trial of a stranger, and a friend-observation condition (FO) to observe the trial of a close friend. During these observations, participants' event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to calculate GFP, and after the task, a subjective assessment of their feelings was measured. Results: Positive emotion was significantly larger under the FO compared to the CT and the SO. Significantly larger negative emotion was found under the SO and FO compared to the CT. In response to a positive cue, significantly larger GFP during 300 to 600 ms was observed under the FO compared to the CT and SO. In response to a negative cue, significantly larger GFP was observed under the FO and SO compared to the CT. A significantly larger GFP under the SO was found in response to only a negative cue. Topographic map analysis suggested that these differences were related to frontal-occipital dynamics. GFP was significantly correlated with empathic trait. Conclusion: These results revealed that familiarity with another person has different effects depending on the valence of empathy. Negative empathy, including the danger perception function, might easily occur even among strangers, whereas positive empathy related to nursing and supporting an inner group does not happen easily with strangers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925444612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925444612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40101-015-0049-3

DO - 10.1186/s40101-015-0049-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 25858485

AN - SCOPUS:84925444612

VL - 34

JO - Journal of Physiological Anthropology

JF - Journal of Physiological Anthropology

SN - 1880-6791

IS - 1

M1 - 13

ER -