Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children

Munetaka Masuda, Hideaki Kado, Yusuke Ando, Akira Shiose, Toshihide Nakano, Kouji Fukae, Yoshihisa Tanoue, Ryuji Tominaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Intermediate/long-term results after aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical valve in children should be clarified as a standard of treatment of aortic valve disease in children. Methods: Forty-five patients aged under 15 years underwent 46 aortic valve replacements using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve. Patients' ages ranged from 1 to 15 years (9 years as a median value), and follow-up period was 9.2 years as a median value (maximum 19 years). Results: In situ valve replacement was performed in 21 procedures, while annular enlargement was required in 25 procedures (Nicks 10, Yamaguchi 3, Manouguian 2, Konno 10). All patients except two received prosthesis 19 mm or larger in size. There was one operative death and two late deaths. Two episodes of cerebral infarction, two valve thrombosis, two re-operations, one infective endocarditis, and one sudden death were recognized as valve-related complications in five patients. The reasons for re-operation were prosthesis-patient mismatch in one (Ross procedure) and valve thrombosis in one (re-replacement). At 15 years after the operation, re-replacement free rate, valve-related event free rate and actuarial survival rate were 94 ± 4%, 86 ± 6% and 92 ± 4%, respectively. The transprosthetic flow velocity estimated by Doppler echocardiography at the final follow-up was well correlated with manufactured valve area index (cm2/body surface area). Conclusions: Although aortic annular enlargement was required in more than half of the cases, intermediate-term results after aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children was satisfactory. Indications for alternative treatment such as Ross procedure might be considered in limited cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-47
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2008

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve
Prostheses and Implants
Thrombosis
Aortic Diseases
Doppler Echocardiography
Body Surface Area
Cerebral Infarction
Sudden Death
Endocarditis
Survival Rate
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children. / Masuda, Munetaka; Kado, Hideaki; Ando, Yusuke; Shiose, Akira; Nakano, Toshihide; Fukae, Kouji; Tanoue, Yoshihisa; Tominaga, Ryuji.

In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.07.2008, p. 42-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Masuda, Munetaka ; Kado, Hideaki ; Ando, Yusuke ; Shiose, Akira ; Nakano, Toshihide ; Fukae, Kouji ; Tanoue, Yoshihisa ; Tominaga, Ryuji. / Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children. In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2008 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 42-47.
@article{a7889dd63729410baf1a5bd6bc3ee539,
title = "Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children",
abstract = "Objective: Intermediate/long-term results after aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical valve in children should be clarified as a standard of treatment of aortic valve disease in children. Methods: Forty-five patients aged under 15 years underwent 46 aortic valve replacements using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve. Patients' ages ranged from 1 to 15 years (9 years as a median value), and follow-up period was 9.2 years as a median value (maximum 19 years). Results: In situ valve replacement was performed in 21 procedures, while annular enlargement was required in 25 procedures (Nicks 10, Yamaguchi 3, Manouguian 2, Konno 10). All patients except two received prosthesis 19 mm or larger in size. There was one operative death and two late deaths. Two episodes of cerebral infarction, two valve thrombosis, two re-operations, one infective endocarditis, and one sudden death were recognized as valve-related complications in five patients. The reasons for re-operation were prosthesis-patient mismatch in one (Ross procedure) and valve thrombosis in one (re-replacement). At 15 years after the operation, re-replacement free rate, valve-related event free rate and actuarial survival rate were 94 ± 4{\%}, 86 ± 6{\%} and 92 ± 4{\%}, respectively. The transprosthetic flow velocity estimated by Doppler echocardiography at the final follow-up was well correlated with manufactured valve area index (cm2/body surface area). Conclusions: Although aortic annular enlargement was required in more than half of the cases, intermediate-term results after aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children was satisfactory. Indications for alternative treatment such as Ross procedure might be considered in limited cases.",
author = "Munetaka Masuda and Hideaki Kado and Yusuke Ando and Akira Shiose and Toshihide Nakano and Kouji Fukae and Yoshihisa Tanoue and Ryuji Tominaga",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.005",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "42--47",
journal = "European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery",
issn = "1010-7940",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children

AU - Masuda, Munetaka

AU - Kado, Hideaki

AU - Ando, Yusuke

AU - Shiose, Akira

AU - Nakano, Toshihide

AU - Fukae, Kouji

AU - Tanoue, Yoshihisa

AU - Tominaga, Ryuji

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - Objective: Intermediate/long-term results after aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical valve in children should be clarified as a standard of treatment of aortic valve disease in children. Methods: Forty-five patients aged under 15 years underwent 46 aortic valve replacements using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve. Patients' ages ranged from 1 to 15 years (9 years as a median value), and follow-up period was 9.2 years as a median value (maximum 19 years). Results: In situ valve replacement was performed in 21 procedures, while annular enlargement was required in 25 procedures (Nicks 10, Yamaguchi 3, Manouguian 2, Konno 10). All patients except two received prosthesis 19 mm or larger in size. There was one operative death and two late deaths. Two episodes of cerebral infarction, two valve thrombosis, two re-operations, one infective endocarditis, and one sudden death were recognized as valve-related complications in five patients. The reasons for re-operation were prosthesis-patient mismatch in one (Ross procedure) and valve thrombosis in one (re-replacement). At 15 years after the operation, re-replacement free rate, valve-related event free rate and actuarial survival rate were 94 ± 4%, 86 ± 6% and 92 ± 4%, respectively. The transprosthetic flow velocity estimated by Doppler echocardiography at the final follow-up was well correlated with manufactured valve area index (cm2/body surface area). Conclusions: Although aortic annular enlargement was required in more than half of the cases, intermediate-term results after aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children was satisfactory. Indications for alternative treatment such as Ross procedure might be considered in limited cases.

AB - Objective: Intermediate/long-term results after aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical valve in children should be clarified as a standard of treatment of aortic valve disease in children. Methods: Forty-five patients aged under 15 years underwent 46 aortic valve replacements using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve. Patients' ages ranged from 1 to 15 years (9 years as a median value), and follow-up period was 9.2 years as a median value (maximum 19 years). Results: In situ valve replacement was performed in 21 procedures, while annular enlargement was required in 25 procedures (Nicks 10, Yamaguchi 3, Manouguian 2, Konno 10). All patients except two received prosthesis 19 mm or larger in size. There was one operative death and two late deaths. Two episodes of cerebral infarction, two valve thrombosis, two re-operations, one infective endocarditis, and one sudden death were recognized as valve-related complications in five patients. The reasons for re-operation were prosthesis-patient mismatch in one (Ross procedure) and valve thrombosis in one (re-replacement). At 15 years after the operation, re-replacement free rate, valve-related event free rate and actuarial survival rate were 94 ± 4%, 86 ± 6% and 92 ± 4%, respectively. The transprosthetic flow velocity estimated by Doppler echocardiography at the final follow-up was well correlated with manufactured valve area index (cm2/body surface area). Conclusions: Although aortic annular enlargement was required in more than half of the cases, intermediate-term results after aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children was satisfactory. Indications for alternative treatment such as Ross procedure might be considered in limited cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45549110063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45549110063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 18479932

AN - SCOPUS:45549110063

VL - 34

SP - 42

EP - 47

JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

SN - 1010-7940

IS - 1

ER -