TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravenous Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for Unknown Onset Stroke with Prior Antithrombotic Medication
T2 - THAWS Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - for the THAWS trial investigators
AU - Koga, Masatoshi
AU - Inoue, Manabu
AU - Miwa, Kaori
AU - Yoshimura, Sohei
AU - Fukuda-Doi, Mayumi
AU - Aoki, Junya
AU - Asakura, Koko
AU - Kanzawa, Takao
AU - Ohtaki, Masafumi
AU - Kamiyama, Kenji
AU - Yakushiji, Yusuke
AU - Igarashi, Shuichi
AU - Doijiri, Ryosuke
AU - Ito, Yasuhiro
AU - Takagi, Yasushi
AU - Sasaki, Makoto
AU - Kitazono, Takanari
AU - Kimura, Kazumi
AU - Minematsu, Kazuo
AU - Yamamoto, Haruko
AU - Toyoda, Kazunori
N1 - Funding Information:
This trial was funded mainly by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (JP16ek0210025h, JP18ek0210091h, 21lk0201094h0003, 21lk0201109h0002 and 20ek0210139h0001) and the Mihara Cerebrovascular Disorder Research Promotion Fund.
Funding Information:
Sasaki reports personal fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, grants and personal fees from Idorsia, and grants from Hitachi.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Japan Atherosclerosis Society.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Aim: This study aimed to assess the potential effect of prior antithrombotic medication for thrombolysis in an unknown onset stroke. Methods: This was a predefined sub-analysis of the THAWS trial. Stroke patients with a time last known well >4.5 h who had a DWI-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg (alteplase group) or standard medical treatment (control group). Patients were dichotomized by prior antithrombotic medication. Results: Of 126 patients (intention-to-treat population), 40 took antithrombotic medication (24 with antiplatelets alone, 13 with anticoagulants alone, and 3 with both), and the remaining 86 did not before stroke onset. Of these, 17 and 52 patients, respectively, received alteplase, and 23 and 34, respectively, had standard medical treatment. Antithrombotic therapy was initiated within 24 h after randomization less frequently in the alteplase group (12% vs. 86%, p<0.01). Both any intracranial hemorrhage within 22–36 h (26% vs. 14%) and a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1 at 90 days (good outcome) (47% vs. 48%) were comparable between the two groups. A good outcome was more common in the alteplase group than in the control group in patients with prior antithrombotic medication [relative risk (RR) 2.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–4.99], but it tended to be less common in the alteplase group in those without (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46–1.03) (p<0.01 for interaction). The frequency of any intracranial hemorrhage did not significantly differ between the two groups in any patients dichotomized by prior antithrombotic medication. Conclusion: Alteplase appears more beneficial in patients with prior antithrombotic medication.
AB - Aim: This study aimed to assess the potential effect of prior antithrombotic medication for thrombolysis in an unknown onset stroke. Methods: This was a predefined sub-analysis of the THAWS trial. Stroke patients with a time last known well >4.5 h who had a DWI-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg (alteplase group) or standard medical treatment (control group). Patients were dichotomized by prior antithrombotic medication. Results: Of 126 patients (intention-to-treat population), 40 took antithrombotic medication (24 with antiplatelets alone, 13 with anticoagulants alone, and 3 with both), and the remaining 86 did not before stroke onset. Of these, 17 and 52 patients, respectively, received alteplase, and 23 and 34, respectively, had standard medical treatment. Antithrombotic therapy was initiated within 24 h after randomization less frequently in the alteplase group (12% vs. 86%, p<0.01). Both any intracranial hemorrhage within 22–36 h (26% vs. 14%) and a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1 at 90 days (good outcome) (47% vs. 48%) were comparable between the two groups. A good outcome was more common in the alteplase group than in the control group in patients with prior antithrombotic medication [relative risk (RR) 2.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–4.99], but it tended to be less common in the alteplase group in those without (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46–1.03) (p<0.01 for interaction). The frequency of any intracranial hemorrhage did not significantly differ between the two groups in any patients dichotomized by prior antithrombotic medication. Conclusion: Alteplase appears more beneficial in patients with prior antithrombotic medication.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145492442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85145492442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5551/jat.63337
DO - 10.5551/jat.63337
M3 - Article
C2 - 35197420
AN - SCOPUS:85145492442
SN - 1340-3478
VL - 30
SP - 15
EP - 22
JO - Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
JF - Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
IS - 1
ER -