Ionospheric Current Variations Induced by the Solar Flares of 6 and 10 September 2017

Charles Owolabi, Jiuhou Lei, O. S. Bolaji, Dexin Ren, Akimasa Yoshikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We examine the global ionospheric current in relation to X9.33 disk and X8.28 limb flares, which had significant differences in their solar X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) fluxes using the ground-based magnetometer data. At the peak of X9.33 flare, when X-ray and EUV radiations were significantly enhanced, the northern current vortex was situated at (40°N, 12 LT), while the southern current vortex was found at (30°S, 13LT). In comparison to the X8.28 flare, the northern current vortex was seen at (16°N, 12LT), while the southern current vortex was situated at (35°S, 14LT), which was 2 hr earlier in local time compared to those observed in the X9.33 flare. The changes in the total current intensity of the X9.33 flare is about 16% less than that of the X8.28 flare, thus revealing that the current variations relative to both flares are due to solar flux and universal time variations. The daytime X9.33 flare northern current vortex is stronger, while the southern vortex is less intense than the corresponding vortex of X8.28 flare. Even though both flares happened in equinox, the current vortices are nearly symmetric. There were significant hemispheric changes in the focus position leading to the hemispheric asymmetry. Our results indicated that both the enhanced X-ray and EUV fluxes during flares could have impacts on the ionospheric electric field and current, but their relative contributions and the underlying physics need further investigations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2020SW002608
JournalSpace Weather
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ionospheric Current Variations Induced by the Solar Flares of 6 and 10 September 2017'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this