Joint analysis of cloud top heights from cloudsat and CALIPSO

New insights into cloud top microphysics

Yuichiro Hagihara, Hajime Okamoto, Zhengzhao Johnny Luo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the differences in the cloud top heights (CTHs) detected by the CloudSat radar and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) lidar. Theoretical estimates have shown that CloudSat has higher sensitivity than CALIPSO does when large particles exist. In such case it might be possible that CloudSat-determined CTHs are larger than CALIPSO-determined CTHs. We compared the global distribution of CTHs detected by CloudSat and CALIPSO (version 3, V3) using our cloud mask schemes after carefully selecting data during September–November 2006. The global mean fraction of clouds where CloudSat-determined CTHs were larger than CALIPSO-determined CTHs turned out to be unexpectedly large. The fractions were 26% and 39% at low level and midlevel, and the corresponding CTH differences were 0.56 km and 0.86 km, respectively. On the western coasts of continents, these clouds occurred within temperature inversions. Accounting for the differences in sensitivity to particle size between CloudSat and CALIPSO, the existence of such clouds indicates that the cloud tops consist of large particles with small number concentration. The discovery of such clouds was revealed by our joint analysis of CloudSat and CALIPSO. When the standard vertical feature mask (VFM) V3 was used, these clouds were also found but the fractions were less pronounced. The differences were partly attributed to the overestimation of cloud fraction in the VFM V3, although the degree of misidentification in V3 was reduced compared with that of V2.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4087-4106
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
Volume119
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 16 2014

Fingerprint

CloudSat
CALIPSO
lidar
satellite observation
Optical radar
aerosols
Aerosols
optical radar
Satellites
Infrared radiation
analysis
radar
Masks
particle size
masks
coasts
temperature inversion

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Joint analysis of cloud top heights from cloudsat and CALIPSO : New insights into cloud top microphysics. / Hagihara, Yuichiro; Okamoto, Hajime; Luo, Zhengzhao Johnny.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 119, No. 7, 16.04.2014, p. 4087-4106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{53ed0f0d773d476c865878327b20d58f,
title = "Joint analysis of cloud top heights from cloudsat and CALIPSO: New insights into cloud top microphysics",
abstract = "We examined the differences in the cloud top heights (CTHs) detected by the CloudSat radar and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) lidar. Theoretical estimates have shown that CloudSat has higher sensitivity than CALIPSO does when large particles exist. In such case it might be possible that CloudSat-determined CTHs are larger than CALIPSO-determined CTHs. We compared the global distribution of CTHs detected by CloudSat and CALIPSO (version 3, V3) using our cloud mask schemes after carefully selecting data during September–November 2006. The global mean fraction of clouds where CloudSat-determined CTHs were larger than CALIPSO-determined CTHs turned out to be unexpectedly large. The fractions were 26{\%} and 39{\%} at low level and midlevel, and the corresponding CTH differences were 0.56 km and 0.86 km, respectively. On the western coasts of continents, these clouds occurred within temperature inversions. Accounting for the differences in sensitivity to particle size between CloudSat and CALIPSO, the existence of such clouds indicates that the cloud tops consist of large particles with small number concentration. The discovery of such clouds was revealed by our joint analysis of CloudSat and CALIPSO. When the standard vertical feature mask (VFM) V3 was used, these clouds were also found but the fractions were less pronounced. The differences were partly attributed to the overestimation of cloud fraction in the VFM V3, although the degree of misidentification in V3 was reduced compared with that of V2.",
author = "Yuichiro Hagihara and Hajime Okamoto and Luo, {Zhengzhao Johnny}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1002/2013JD020919",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "4087--4106",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Joint analysis of cloud top heights from cloudsat and CALIPSO

T2 - New insights into cloud top microphysics

AU - Hagihara, Yuichiro

AU - Okamoto, Hajime

AU - Luo, Zhengzhao Johnny

PY - 2014/4/16

Y1 - 2014/4/16

N2 - We examined the differences in the cloud top heights (CTHs) detected by the CloudSat radar and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) lidar. Theoretical estimates have shown that CloudSat has higher sensitivity than CALIPSO does when large particles exist. In such case it might be possible that CloudSat-determined CTHs are larger than CALIPSO-determined CTHs. We compared the global distribution of CTHs detected by CloudSat and CALIPSO (version 3, V3) using our cloud mask schemes after carefully selecting data during September–November 2006. The global mean fraction of clouds where CloudSat-determined CTHs were larger than CALIPSO-determined CTHs turned out to be unexpectedly large. The fractions were 26% and 39% at low level and midlevel, and the corresponding CTH differences were 0.56 km and 0.86 km, respectively. On the western coasts of continents, these clouds occurred within temperature inversions. Accounting for the differences in sensitivity to particle size between CloudSat and CALIPSO, the existence of such clouds indicates that the cloud tops consist of large particles with small number concentration. The discovery of such clouds was revealed by our joint analysis of CloudSat and CALIPSO. When the standard vertical feature mask (VFM) V3 was used, these clouds were also found but the fractions were less pronounced. The differences were partly attributed to the overestimation of cloud fraction in the VFM V3, although the degree of misidentification in V3 was reduced compared with that of V2.

AB - We examined the differences in the cloud top heights (CTHs) detected by the CloudSat radar and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) lidar. Theoretical estimates have shown that CloudSat has higher sensitivity than CALIPSO does when large particles exist. In such case it might be possible that CloudSat-determined CTHs are larger than CALIPSO-determined CTHs. We compared the global distribution of CTHs detected by CloudSat and CALIPSO (version 3, V3) using our cloud mask schemes after carefully selecting data during September–November 2006. The global mean fraction of clouds where CloudSat-determined CTHs were larger than CALIPSO-determined CTHs turned out to be unexpectedly large. The fractions were 26% and 39% at low level and midlevel, and the corresponding CTH differences were 0.56 km and 0.86 km, respectively. On the western coasts of continents, these clouds occurred within temperature inversions. Accounting for the differences in sensitivity to particle size between CloudSat and CALIPSO, the existence of such clouds indicates that the cloud tops consist of large particles with small number concentration. The discovery of such clouds was revealed by our joint analysis of CloudSat and CALIPSO. When the standard vertical feature mask (VFM) V3 was used, these clouds were also found but the fractions were less pronounced. The differences were partly attributed to the overestimation of cloud fraction in the VFM V3, although the degree of misidentification in V3 was reduced compared with that of V2.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904746708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904746708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2013JD020919

DO - 10.1002/2013JD020919

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 4087

EP - 4106

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 7

ER -