Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system

Hiroki Uchida, Yukio Iwashita, Kazuhiro Tada, Kunihiro Saga, Hiroomi Takayama, Teijiro Hirashita, Yuichi Endo, Masayuki Ohta, Masafumi Inomata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic liver resection is widely used for liver tumors, but its utility in patients with cirrhosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with liver cirrhosis with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system. Methods: From January 2010 to March 2016, the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in 95 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes were analyzed to identify differences between the liver cirrhosis and non-liver cirrhosis groups; these groups were further stratified to high and low difficulty scores. The surgical outcomes of both groups were compared according to the difficulty scores. Results: Overall, 53/95 (55.8%) patients were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in surgical duration, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity between groups, although liver function was worse in the liver cirrhosis group than in the non-liver cirrhosis group. Multivariate analysis showed that the difficulty score was an independent predictor of increased blood loss. In particular, blood loss in cirrhotic patients was significantly greater with a high difficulty score than with a low difficulty score. Conclusions: The safety profile of laparoscopic liver resection was the same in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. However, patients with liver cirrhosis and a high difficulty score require extra attention, because of a higher risk for perioperative blood loss.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-377
Number of pages7
JournalLangenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Volume403
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Liver Cirrhosis
Liver
Fibrosis
Surgical Blood Loss
Length of Stay
Multivariate Analysis
Morbidity
Safety
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system. / Uchida, Hiroki; Iwashita, Yukio; Tada, Kazuhiro; Saga, Kunihiro; Takayama, Hiroomi; Hirashita, Teijiro; Endo, Yuichi; Ohta, Masayuki; Inomata, Masafumi.

In: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, Vol. 403, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 371-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uchida, H, Iwashita, Y, Tada, K, Saga, K, Takayama, H, Hirashita, T, Endo, Y, Ohta, M & Inomata, M 2018, 'Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system', Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, vol. 403, no. 3, pp. 371-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1671-4
Uchida, Hiroki ; Iwashita, Yukio ; Tada, Kazuhiro ; Saga, Kunihiro ; Takayama, Hiroomi ; Hirashita, Teijiro ; Endo, Yuichi ; Ohta, Masayuki ; Inomata, Masafumi. / Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system. In: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 403, No. 3. pp. 371-377.
@article{6f446d84c1674fd2b126c3b2ea164fde,
title = "Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system",
abstract = "Purpose: Laparoscopic liver resection is widely used for liver tumors, but its utility in patients with cirrhosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with liver cirrhosis with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system. Methods: From January 2010 to March 2016, the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in 95 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes were analyzed to identify differences between the liver cirrhosis and non-liver cirrhosis groups; these groups were further stratified to high and low difficulty scores. The surgical outcomes of both groups were compared according to the difficulty scores. Results: Overall, 53/95 (55.8{\%}) patients were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in surgical duration, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity between groups, although liver function was worse in the liver cirrhosis group than in the non-liver cirrhosis group. Multivariate analysis showed that the difficulty score was an independent predictor of increased blood loss. In particular, blood loss in cirrhotic patients was significantly greater with a high difficulty score than with a low difficulty score. Conclusions: The safety profile of laparoscopic liver resection was the same in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. However, patients with liver cirrhosis and a high difficulty score require extra attention, because of a higher risk for perioperative blood loss.",
author = "Hiroki Uchida and Yukio Iwashita and Kazuhiro Tada and Kunihiro Saga and Hiroomi Takayama and Teijiro Hirashita and Yuichi Endo and Masayuki Ohta and Masafumi Inomata",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00423-018-1671-4",
language = "English",
volume = "403",
pages = "371--377",
journal = "Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery",
issn = "1435-2443",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system

AU - Uchida, Hiroki

AU - Iwashita, Yukio

AU - Tada, Kazuhiro

AU - Saga, Kunihiro

AU - Takayama, Hiroomi

AU - Hirashita, Teijiro

AU - Endo, Yuichi

AU - Ohta, Masayuki

AU - Inomata, Masafumi

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Purpose: Laparoscopic liver resection is widely used for liver tumors, but its utility in patients with cirrhosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with liver cirrhosis with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system. Methods: From January 2010 to March 2016, the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in 95 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes were analyzed to identify differences between the liver cirrhosis and non-liver cirrhosis groups; these groups were further stratified to high and low difficulty scores. The surgical outcomes of both groups were compared according to the difficulty scores. Results: Overall, 53/95 (55.8%) patients were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in surgical duration, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity between groups, although liver function was worse in the liver cirrhosis group than in the non-liver cirrhosis group. Multivariate analysis showed that the difficulty score was an independent predictor of increased blood loss. In particular, blood loss in cirrhotic patients was significantly greater with a high difficulty score than with a low difficulty score. Conclusions: The safety profile of laparoscopic liver resection was the same in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. However, patients with liver cirrhosis and a high difficulty score require extra attention, because of a higher risk for perioperative blood loss.

AB - Purpose: Laparoscopic liver resection is widely used for liver tumors, but its utility in patients with cirrhosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with liver cirrhosis with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system. Methods: From January 2010 to March 2016, the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in 95 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes were analyzed to identify differences between the liver cirrhosis and non-liver cirrhosis groups; these groups were further stratified to high and low difficulty scores. The surgical outcomes of both groups were compared according to the difficulty scores. Results: Overall, 53/95 (55.8%) patients were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in surgical duration, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity between groups, although liver function was worse in the liver cirrhosis group than in the non-liver cirrhosis group. Multivariate analysis showed that the difficulty score was an independent predictor of increased blood loss. In particular, blood loss in cirrhotic patients was significantly greater with a high difficulty score than with a low difficulty score. Conclusions: The safety profile of laparoscopic liver resection was the same in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. However, patients with liver cirrhosis and a high difficulty score require extra attention, because of a higher risk for perioperative blood loss.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044950829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044950829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00423-018-1671-4

DO - 10.1007/s00423-018-1671-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 29619626

AN - SCOPUS:85044950829

VL - 403

SP - 371

EP - 377

JO - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

JF - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

SN - 1435-2443

IS - 3

ER -