Left lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults

Yuji Soejima, K. Shirabe, A. Taketomi, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, H. Uchiyama, Toru Ikegami, M. Ninomiya, Noboru Harada, H. Ijichi, Yoshihiko Maehara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Adult left lobe (LL) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not generally been recognized as a feasible procedure because of the problem of graft size. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility and short- and long-term results of adult LL LDLT in comparison with right lobe (RL) LDLT. Data on 200 consecutive LL LDLTs, including five retransplants, were retrospectively compared with those of 112 RL LDLTs, in terms of survival, complications and donor morbidity. The mean graft weight to standard volume ratio of LL grafts was 38.7% whereas that of RL grafts was 47.6% (p < 0.0001). The 1-, 5- and 10-year patient survival rates of LL LDLT were 85.6%, 77.9% and 69.5%, respectively, which were comparable to those of RL LDLT (89.8%, 71.3% and 70.7%, respectively). The incidence of small-for-size syndromewas higher in LL LDLT (19.5%) than in RL LDLT (7.1%) (p < 0.01). The overall donor morbidity rates were comparable between LL (36.0%) and RL (34.8%), whereas postoperative liver function tests and hospital stay were significantly better (p < 0.0001) in LL donors. In conclusion, adult LL LDLT has comparable outcomes to that of RL LDLT. LL LDLT is viable and is the first choice in adult LDLT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1877-1885
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume12
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

Living Donors
Liver Transplantation
Transplants
Tissue Donors
Morbidity
Liver Function Tests
Length of Stay
Survival Rate
Weights and Measures

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Transplantation
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Left lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults. / Soejima, Yuji; Shirabe, K.; Taketomi, A.; Yoshizumi, Tomoharu; Uchiyama, H.; Ikegami, Toru; Ninomiya, M.; Harada, Noboru; Ijichi, H.; Maehara, Yoshihiko.

In: American Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 12, No. 7, 01.07.2012, p. 1877-1885.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soejima, Yuji ; Shirabe, K. ; Taketomi, A. ; Yoshizumi, Tomoharu ; Uchiyama, H. ; Ikegami, Toru ; Ninomiya, M. ; Harada, Noboru ; Ijichi, H. ; Maehara, Yoshihiko. / Left lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults. In: American Journal of Transplantation. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 7. pp. 1877-1885.
@article{61ca263b2fff4fb6b59ad9bd92742dbc,
title = "Left lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults",
abstract = "Adult left lobe (LL) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not generally been recognized as a feasible procedure because of the problem of graft size. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility and short- and long-term results of adult LL LDLT in comparison with right lobe (RL) LDLT. Data on 200 consecutive LL LDLTs, including five retransplants, were retrospectively compared with those of 112 RL LDLTs, in terms of survival, complications and donor morbidity. The mean graft weight to standard volume ratio of LL grafts was 38.7{\%} whereas that of RL grafts was 47.6{\%} (p < 0.0001). The 1-, 5- and 10-year patient survival rates of LL LDLT were 85.6{\%}, 77.9{\%} and 69.5{\%}, respectively, which were comparable to those of RL LDLT (89.8{\%}, 71.3{\%} and 70.7{\%}, respectively). The incidence of small-for-size syndromewas higher in LL LDLT (19.5{\%}) than in RL LDLT (7.1{\%}) (p < 0.01). The overall donor morbidity rates were comparable between LL (36.0{\%}) and RL (34.8{\%}), whereas postoperative liver function tests and hospital stay were significantly better (p < 0.0001) in LL donors. In conclusion, adult LL LDLT has comparable outcomes to that of RL LDLT. LL LDLT is viable and is the first choice in adult LDLT.",
author = "Yuji Soejima and K. Shirabe and A. Taketomi and Tomoharu Yoshizumi and H. Uchiyama and Toru Ikegami and M. Ninomiya and Noboru Harada and H. Ijichi and Yoshihiko Maehara",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04022.x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1877--1885",
journal = "American Journal of Transplantation",
issn = "1600-6135",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Left lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults

AU - Soejima, Yuji

AU - Shirabe, K.

AU - Taketomi, A.

AU - Yoshizumi, Tomoharu

AU - Uchiyama, H.

AU - Ikegami, Toru

AU - Ninomiya, M.

AU - Harada, Noboru

AU - Ijichi, H.

AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Adult left lobe (LL) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not generally been recognized as a feasible procedure because of the problem of graft size. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility and short- and long-term results of adult LL LDLT in comparison with right lobe (RL) LDLT. Data on 200 consecutive LL LDLTs, including five retransplants, were retrospectively compared with those of 112 RL LDLTs, in terms of survival, complications and donor morbidity. The mean graft weight to standard volume ratio of LL grafts was 38.7% whereas that of RL grafts was 47.6% (p < 0.0001). The 1-, 5- and 10-year patient survival rates of LL LDLT were 85.6%, 77.9% and 69.5%, respectively, which were comparable to those of RL LDLT (89.8%, 71.3% and 70.7%, respectively). The incidence of small-for-size syndromewas higher in LL LDLT (19.5%) than in RL LDLT (7.1%) (p < 0.01). The overall donor morbidity rates were comparable between LL (36.0%) and RL (34.8%), whereas postoperative liver function tests and hospital stay were significantly better (p < 0.0001) in LL donors. In conclusion, adult LL LDLT has comparable outcomes to that of RL LDLT. LL LDLT is viable and is the first choice in adult LDLT.

AB - Adult left lobe (LL) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not generally been recognized as a feasible procedure because of the problem of graft size. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility and short- and long-term results of adult LL LDLT in comparison with right lobe (RL) LDLT. Data on 200 consecutive LL LDLTs, including five retransplants, were retrospectively compared with those of 112 RL LDLTs, in terms of survival, complications and donor morbidity. The mean graft weight to standard volume ratio of LL grafts was 38.7% whereas that of RL grafts was 47.6% (p < 0.0001). The 1-, 5- and 10-year patient survival rates of LL LDLT were 85.6%, 77.9% and 69.5%, respectively, which were comparable to those of RL LDLT (89.8%, 71.3% and 70.7%, respectively). The incidence of small-for-size syndromewas higher in LL LDLT (19.5%) than in RL LDLT (7.1%) (p < 0.01). The overall donor morbidity rates were comparable between LL (36.0%) and RL (34.8%), whereas postoperative liver function tests and hospital stay were significantly better (p < 0.0001) in LL donors. In conclusion, adult LL LDLT has comparable outcomes to that of RL LDLT. LL LDLT is viable and is the first choice in adult LDLT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863206790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863206790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04022.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04022.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22429497

AN - SCOPUS:84863206790

VL - 12

SP - 1877

EP - 1885

JO - American Journal of Transplantation

JF - American Journal of Transplantation

SN - 1600-6135

IS - 7

ER -