Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma versus low-grade myxofibrosarcoma in the extremities and trunk. A comparison of clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features

Y. Oda, T. Takahira, K. Kawaguchi, H. Yamamoto, S. Tamiya, S. Matsuda, K. Tanaka, Y. Iwamoto, M. Tsuneyoshi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a distinctive variant of fibrosarcoma and has been reported to have metastatic potential despite its low-grade histological findings. Low-grade myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is an important differential diagnosis of LGMFS, because it shows different biological behaviour. Of 75 MFSs in the extremities and trunk, we defined 22 grade 1 tumours as low-grade MFS according to the French Federation of Cancer Centres grading system and compared the clinicopathological factors and immunohistochemical expression of cell cycle regulators with those of 11 LGFMSs. Methods and results: The two entities could be distinguished on histological grounds. Low-grade MFS was characterized by the presence of prominent elongated, curvilinear capillaries and pseudolipoblasts, accompanied by an abundant myxoid matrix. It had no extensive solid areas. LGFMS was composed of bland spindle cells arranged in a whorled pattern with alternating myxoid and fibrous stroma. Curvilinear capillaries were not prominent and cytological atypia was absent. No tumour necrosis was observed in any of the 11 LGFMSs, whereas only one case showed tumour necrosis in less than 50% of the tumour in 22 low-grade MFSs. The patients with low-grade MFS were significantly older than those with LGFMS (low-grade MFS average, 60.1 years; LGFMS average, 31.5 years; P < 0.0001) and low-grade MFS occurred more frequently in a superficial location (low-grade MFS 14/20; LGFMS 2/11; P = 0.0077). As for cell cycle regulator expression, the MIB-1 labelling index (LI) (14.76 on average) and cyclin E LI (11.55 on average) in low-grade MFS were significantly higher than those (MIB-I LI, 4.68 on average; cyclin E LI, 3.38 on average) of LGFMS, while p21 LI (25.53 on average) and p27 LI (42.68 on average) in low-grade MFS were significantly lower than those (p21 LI, 42.74 on average; p27 LI, 57.28 on average) of LGFMS. Conclusions: We conclude that low-grade MFS and LGFMS are distinctly different clinicopathological entities and the assessment of the immunohistochemical expression of MEB-1, cyclin E, p21 and p27 as well as conventional clinicopathological features may be helpful to distinguish low-grade MFS from LGFMS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-38
Number of pages10
JournalHistopathology
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2004

Fingerprint

Sarcoma
Extremities
Cyclin E
Neoplasms
Cell Cycle
Necrosis
Fibrosarcoma
Differential Diagnosis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Cite this

Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma versus low-grade myxofibrosarcoma in the extremities and trunk. A comparison of clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features. / Oda, Y.; Takahira, T.; Kawaguchi, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Tamiya, S.; Matsuda, S.; Tanaka, K.; Iwamoto, Y.; Tsuneyoshi, M.

In: Histopathology, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.07.2004, p. 29-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d47394c4461847458c3bf616906bfd82,
title = "Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma versus low-grade myxofibrosarcoma in the extremities and trunk. A comparison of clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features",
abstract = "Aims: Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a distinctive variant of fibrosarcoma and has been reported to have metastatic potential despite its low-grade histological findings. Low-grade myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is an important differential diagnosis of LGMFS, because it shows different biological behaviour. Of 75 MFSs in the extremities and trunk, we defined 22 grade 1 tumours as low-grade MFS according to the French Federation of Cancer Centres grading system and compared the clinicopathological factors and immunohistochemical expression of cell cycle regulators with those of 11 LGFMSs. Methods and results: The two entities could be distinguished on histological grounds. Low-grade MFS was characterized by the presence of prominent elongated, curvilinear capillaries and pseudolipoblasts, accompanied by an abundant myxoid matrix. It had no extensive solid areas. LGFMS was composed of bland spindle cells arranged in a whorled pattern with alternating myxoid and fibrous stroma. Curvilinear capillaries were not prominent and cytological atypia was absent. No tumour necrosis was observed in any of the 11 LGFMSs, whereas only one case showed tumour necrosis in less than 50{\%} of the tumour in 22 low-grade MFSs. The patients with low-grade MFS were significantly older than those with LGFMS (low-grade MFS average, 60.1 years; LGFMS average, 31.5 years; P < 0.0001) and low-grade MFS occurred more frequently in a superficial location (low-grade MFS 14/20; LGFMS 2/11; P = 0.0077). As for cell cycle regulator expression, the MIB-1 labelling index (LI) (14.76 on average) and cyclin E LI (11.55 on average) in low-grade MFS were significantly higher than those (MIB-I LI, 4.68 on average; cyclin E LI, 3.38 on average) of LGFMS, while p21 LI (25.53 on average) and p27 LI (42.68 on average) in low-grade MFS were significantly lower than those (p21 LI, 42.74 on average; p27 LI, 57.28 on average) of LGFMS. Conclusions: We conclude that low-grade MFS and LGFMS are distinctly different clinicopathological entities and the assessment of the immunohistochemical expression of MEB-1, cyclin E, p21 and p27 as well as conventional clinicopathological features may be helpful to distinguish low-grade MFS from LGFMS.",
author = "Y. Oda and T. Takahira and K. Kawaguchi and H. Yamamoto and S. Tamiya and S. Matsuda and K. Tanaka and Y. Iwamoto and M. Tsuneyoshi",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01886.x",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "29--38",
journal = "Histopathology",
issn = "0309-0167",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma versus low-grade myxofibrosarcoma in the extremities and trunk. A comparison of clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features

AU - Oda, Y.

AU - Takahira, T.

AU - Kawaguchi, K.

AU - Yamamoto, H.

AU - Tamiya, S.

AU - Matsuda, S.

AU - Tanaka, K.

AU - Iwamoto, Y.

AU - Tsuneyoshi, M.

PY - 2004/7/1

Y1 - 2004/7/1

N2 - Aims: Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a distinctive variant of fibrosarcoma and has been reported to have metastatic potential despite its low-grade histological findings. Low-grade myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is an important differential diagnosis of LGMFS, because it shows different biological behaviour. Of 75 MFSs in the extremities and trunk, we defined 22 grade 1 tumours as low-grade MFS according to the French Federation of Cancer Centres grading system and compared the clinicopathological factors and immunohistochemical expression of cell cycle regulators with those of 11 LGFMSs. Methods and results: The two entities could be distinguished on histological grounds. Low-grade MFS was characterized by the presence of prominent elongated, curvilinear capillaries and pseudolipoblasts, accompanied by an abundant myxoid matrix. It had no extensive solid areas. LGFMS was composed of bland spindle cells arranged in a whorled pattern with alternating myxoid and fibrous stroma. Curvilinear capillaries were not prominent and cytological atypia was absent. No tumour necrosis was observed in any of the 11 LGFMSs, whereas only one case showed tumour necrosis in less than 50% of the tumour in 22 low-grade MFSs. The patients with low-grade MFS were significantly older than those with LGFMS (low-grade MFS average, 60.1 years; LGFMS average, 31.5 years; P < 0.0001) and low-grade MFS occurred more frequently in a superficial location (low-grade MFS 14/20; LGFMS 2/11; P = 0.0077). As for cell cycle regulator expression, the MIB-1 labelling index (LI) (14.76 on average) and cyclin E LI (11.55 on average) in low-grade MFS were significantly higher than those (MIB-I LI, 4.68 on average; cyclin E LI, 3.38 on average) of LGFMS, while p21 LI (25.53 on average) and p27 LI (42.68 on average) in low-grade MFS were significantly lower than those (p21 LI, 42.74 on average; p27 LI, 57.28 on average) of LGFMS. Conclusions: We conclude that low-grade MFS and LGFMS are distinctly different clinicopathological entities and the assessment of the immunohistochemical expression of MEB-1, cyclin E, p21 and p27 as well as conventional clinicopathological features may be helpful to distinguish low-grade MFS from LGFMS.

AB - Aims: Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a distinctive variant of fibrosarcoma and has been reported to have metastatic potential despite its low-grade histological findings. Low-grade myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is an important differential diagnosis of LGMFS, because it shows different biological behaviour. Of 75 MFSs in the extremities and trunk, we defined 22 grade 1 tumours as low-grade MFS according to the French Federation of Cancer Centres grading system and compared the clinicopathological factors and immunohistochemical expression of cell cycle regulators with those of 11 LGFMSs. Methods and results: The two entities could be distinguished on histological grounds. Low-grade MFS was characterized by the presence of prominent elongated, curvilinear capillaries and pseudolipoblasts, accompanied by an abundant myxoid matrix. It had no extensive solid areas. LGFMS was composed of bland spindle cells arranged in a whorled pattern with alternating myxoid and fibrous stroma. Curvilinear capillaries were not prominent and cytological atypia was absent. No tumour necrosis was observed in any of the 11 LGFMSs, whereas only one case showed tumour necrosis in less than 50% of the tumour in 22 low-grade MFSs. The patients with low-grade MFS were significantly older than those with LGFMS (low-grade MFS average, 60.1 years; LGFMS average, 31.5 years; P < 0.0001) and low-grade MFS occurred more frequently in a superficial location (low-grade MFS 14/20; LGFMS 2/11; P = 0.0077). As for cell cycle regulator expression, the MIB-1 labelling index (LI) (14.76 on average) and cyclin E LI (11.55 on average) in low-grade MFS were significantly higher than those (MIB-I LI, 4.68 on average; cyclin E LI, 3.38 on average) of LGFMS, while p21 LI (25.53 on average) and p27 LI (42.68 on average) in low-grade MFS were significantly lower than those (p21 LI, 42.74 on average; p27 LI, 57.28 on average) of LGFMS. Conclusions: We conclude that low-grade MFS and LGFMS are distinctly different clinicopathological entities and the assessment of the immunohistochemical expression of MEB-1, cyclin E, p21 and p27 as well as conventional clinicopathological features may be helpful to distinguish low-grade MFS from LGFMS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242790798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242790798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01886.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01886.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15228441

AN - SCOPUS:3242790798

VL - 45

SP - 29

EP - 38

JO - Histopathology

JF - Histopathology

SN - 0309-0167

IS - 1

ER -