Lumbar lordosis does not correlate with pelvic incidence in the cases with the lordosis apex located at L3 or above

Osamu Tono, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Masashi Okamoto, Shun Hatsushikano, Haruka Shimoda, Kei Watanabe, Katsumi Harimaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the relationship between PI and L1–S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) is always positive, even in cases with different lumbar sagittal profiles. Methods: Standing whole-spine sagittal alignment was measured with EOS system in 100 healthy adults (46 men, 54 women, mean age 40.9 years). The apex of lumbar lordosis was defined as the most anterior lumbar vertebra or intervertebral disk from the gravity line determined by a force plate measurement. Subjects were stratified into three groups: the upper group with an apex between L1 and L3 (UppA, n = 19), the middle group with an apex from L3/4 to L4/5 (MidA, n = 67), and the lower group with an apex at L5 or below (LowA, n = 14). PI, PT, SS, thoracic kyphosis (TK), LL, SVA, T1 pelvic angle, and knee flexion angle were compared between the groups. The correlation between LL and PI in each group was also compared. Results: PI and SS differed significantly between the three groups, and LL was significantly different between LowA and MidA and UppA. TK and KF did not differ significantly between groups. LL and PI were significantly positively correlated in the MidA and LowA groups, but not in the UppA group. Conclusion: Contrary to the hypothesis, the correlation coefficient between PI and LL was not significant in the cases with apex above L3, suggesting that the relationship between PI and LL is not always constant, and whole sagittal alignment should be taken into account. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1948-1954
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Lordosis
Incidence
Kyphosis
Thorax
Lumbar Vertebrae
Intervertebral Disc
Gravitation
Knee
Spine

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Lumbar lordosis does not correlate with pelvic incidence in the cases with the lordosis apex located at L3 or above. / Tono, Osamu; Hasegawa, Kazuhiro; Okamoto, Masashi; Hatsushikano, Shun; Shimoda, Haruka; Watanabe, Kei; Harimaya, Katsumi.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 28, No. 9, 01.09.2019, p. 1948-1954.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tono, Osamu ; Hasegawa, Kazuhiro ; Okamoto, Masashi ; Hatsushikano, Shun ; Shimoda, Haruka ; Watanabe, Kei ; Harimaya, Katsumi. / Lumbar lordosis does not correlate with pelvic incidence in the cases with the lordosis apex located at L3 or above. In: European Spine Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 9. pp. 1948-1954.
@article{c6298bd819754a93bf80bdf7b34d6bad,
title = "Lumbar lordosis does not correlate with pelvic incidence in the cases with the lordosis apex located at L3 or above",
abstract = "Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the relationship between PI and L1–S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) is always positive, even in cases with different lumbar sagittal profiles. Methods: Standing whole-spine sagittal alignment was measured with EOS system in 100 healthy adults (46 men, 54 women, mean age 40.9 years). The apex of lumbar lordosis was defined as the most anterior lumbar vertebra or intervertebral disk from the gravity line determined by a force plate measurement. Subjects were stratified into three groups: the upper group with an apex between L1 and L3 (UppA, n = 19), the middle group with an apex from L3/4 to L4/5 (MidA, n = 67), and the lower group with an apex at L5 or below (LowA, n = 14). PI, PT, SS, thoracic kyphosis (TK), LL, SVA, T1 pelvic angle, and knee flexion angle were compared between the groups. The correlation between LL and PI in each group was also compared. Results: PI and SS differed significantly between the three groups, and LL was significantly different between LowA and MidA and UppA. TK and KF did not differ significantly between groups. LL and PI were significantly positively correlated in the MidA and LowA groups, but not in the UppA group. Conclusion: Contrary to the hypothesis, the correlation coefficient between PI and LL was not significant in the cases with apex above L3, suggesting that the relationship between PI and LL is not always constant, and whole sagittal alignment should be taken into account. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].",
author = "Osamu Tono and Kazuhiro Hasegawa and Masashi Okamoto and Shun Hatsushikano and Haruka Shimoda and Kei Watanabe and Katsumi Harimaya",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-018-5695-9",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1948--1954",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lumbar lordosis does not correlate with pelvic incidence in the cases with the lordosis apex located at L3 or above

AU - Tono, Osamu

AU - Hasegawa, Kazuhiro

AU - Okamoto, Masashi

AU - Hatsushikano, Shun

AU - Shimoda, Haruka

AU - Watanabe, Kei

AU - Harimaya, Katsumi

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the relationship between PI and L1–S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) is always positive, even in cases with different lumbar sagittal profiles. Methods: Standing whole-spine sagittal alignment was measured with EOS system in 100 healthy adults (46 men, 54 women, mean age 40.9 years). The apex of lumbar lordosis was defined as the most anterior lumbar vertebra or intervertebral disk from the gravity line determined by a force plate measurement. Subjects were stratified into three groups: the upper group with an apex between L1 and L3 (UppA, n = 19), the middle group with an apex from L3/4 to L4/5 (MidA, n = 67), and the lower group with an apex at L5 or below (LowA, n = 14). PI, PT, SS, thoracic kyphosis (TK), LL, SVA, T1 pelvic angle, and knee flexion angle were compared between the groups. The correlation between LL and PI in each group was also compared. Results: PI and SS differed significantly between the three groups, and LL was significantly different between LowA and MidA and UppA. TK and KF did not differ significantly between groups. LL and PI were significantly positively correlated in the MidA and LowA groups, but not in the UppA group. Conclusion: Contrary to the hypothesis, the correlation coefficient between PI and LL was not significant in the cases with apex above L3, suggesting that the relationship between PI and LL is not always constant, and whole sagittal alignment should be taken into account. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

AB - Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the relationship between PI and L1–S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) is always positive, even in cases with different lumbar sagittal profiles. Methods: Standing whole-spine sagittal alignment was measured with EOS system in 100 healthy adults (46 men, 54 women, mean age 40.9 years). The apex of lumbar lordosis was defined as the most anterior lumbar vertebra or intervertebral disk from the gravity line determined by a force plate measurement. Subjects were stratified into three groups: the upper group with an apex between L1 and L3 (UppA, n = 19), the middle group with an apex from L3/4 to L4/5 (MidA, n = 67), and the lower group with an apex at L5 or below (LowA, n = 14). PI, PT, SS, thoracic kyphosis (TK), LL, SVA, T1 pelvic angle, and knee flexion angle were compared between the groups. The correlation between LL and PI in each group was also compared. Results: PI and SS differed significantly between the three groups, and LL was significantly different between LowA and MidA and UppA. TK and KF did not differ significantly between groups. LL and PI were significantly positively correlated in the MidA and LowA groups, but not in the UppA group. Conclusion: Contrary to the hypothesis, the correlation coefficient between PI and LL was not significant in the cases with apex above L3, suggesting that the relationship between PI and LL is not always constant, and whole sagittal alignment should be taken into account. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049672576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049672576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-018-5695-9

DO - 10.1007/s00586-018-5695-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049672576

VL - 28

SP - 1948

EP - 1954

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 9

ER -