Lymph-node metastases: Efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer

Tatsuro Fukuya, Hiroshi Honda, Takamoto Hayashi, Kuniyuki Kaneko, Yuko Tateshi, Tokugen Ro, Yoshihiko Maehara, Masao Tanaka, Masazumi Tsuneyoshi, Kouji Masuda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

171 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of helical computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymphadenopathy in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT (5-mm section thickness, 5-mm/sec table incrementation) was performed in 58 patients (39 men, 19 women; mean age, 63.8 years) with gastric cancer; 1,082 lymph nodes (138 positive, 944 negative for metastasis) were resected at surgery. Findings at CT and resection were compared. Sensitivity for detecting lymph nodes was evaluated according to nodal size and presence of metastasis. RESULTS: Seven (1.1%) of 649 lymph nodes 1-4 mm, 160 (45.1%) of 355 nodes 5-9 mm, and 56 (72%) of 78 nodes larger than 9 mm were detected at CT. For nodes of at least 5 mm, sensitivity for detecting metastasis-positive nodes (79 [75.2%] of 105 nodes) was higher than that for detecting metastasis-negative nodes (137 [41.8%] of 328; P < .01). Differences between positive and negative nodes in CT attenuation (110 HU ± 25 vs 66 HU ± 32) and short-to-long axis ratios (0.81 ± 0.15 vs 0.57 ± 0.15; P < .001) were significant. CONCLUSION: Helical CT is effective for detection of metastatic lymphadenopathy from gastric cancer. CT attenuation and lymph-node configuration aid in diagnosis of malignant adenopathy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)705-711
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume197
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Spiral Computed Tomography
Stomach Neoplasms
Lymph Nodes
Tomography
Neoplasm Metastasis
Lymphadenopathy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Fukuya, T., Honda, H., Hayashi, T., Kaneko, K., Tateshi, Y., Ro, T., ... Masuda, K. (1995). Lymph-node metastases: Efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. Radiology, 197(3), 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480743

Lymph-node metastases : Efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. / Fukuya, Tatsuro; Honda, Hiroshi; Hayashi, Takamoto; Kaneko, Kuniyuki; Tateshi, Yuko; Ro, Tokugen; Maehara, Yoshihiko; Tanaka, Masao; Tsuneyoshi, Masazumi; Masuda, Kouji.

In: Radiology, Vol. 197, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 705-711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fukuya, T, Honda, H, Hayashi, T, Kaneko, K, Tateshi, Y, Ro, T, Maehara, Y, Tanaka, M, Tsuneyoshi, M & Masuda, K 1995, 'Lymph-node metastases: Efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer', Radiology, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480743
Fukuya, Tatsuro ; Honda, Hiroshi ; Hayashi, Takamoto ; Kaneko, Kuniyuki ; Tateshi, Yuko ; Ro, Tokugen ; Maehara, Yoshihiko ; Tanaka, Masao ; Tsuneyoshi, Masazumi ; Masuda, Kouji. / Lymph-node metastases : Efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. In: Radiology. 1995 ; Vol. 197, No. 3. pp. 705-711.
@article{ae46f456b20c44ae808570a8ec49fe07,
title = "Lymph-node metastases: Efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of helical computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymphadenopathy in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT (5-mm section thickness, 5-mm/sec table incrementation) was performed in 58 patients (39 men, 19 women; mean age, 63.8 years) with gastric cancer; 1,082 lymph nodes (138 positive, 944 negative for metastasis) were resected at surgery. Findings at CT and resection were compared. Sensitivity for detecting lymph nodes was evaluated according to nodal size and presence of metastasis. RESULTS: Seven (1.1{\%}) of 649 lymph nodes 1-4 mm, 160 (45.1{\%}) of 355 nodes 5-9 mm, and 56 (72{\%}) of 78 nodes larger than 9 mm were detected at CT. For nodes of at least 5 mm, sensitivity for detecting metastasis-positive nodes (79 [75.2{\%}] of 105 nodes) was higher than that for detecting metastasis-negative nodes (137 [41.8{\%}] of 328; P < .01). Differences between positive and negative nodes in CT attenuation (110 HU ± 25 vs 66 HU ± 32) and short-to-long axis ratios (0.81 ± 0.15 vs 0.57 ± 0.15; P < .001) were significant. CONCLUSION: Helical CT is effective for detection of metastatic lymphadenopathy from gastric cancer. CT attenuation and lymph-node configuration aid in diagnosis of malignant adenopathy.",
author = "Tatsuro Fukuya and Hiroshi Honda and Takamoto Hayashi and Kuniyuki Kaneko and Yuko Tateshi and Tokugen Ro and Yoshihiko Maehara and Masao Tanaka and Masazumi Tsuneyoshi and Kouji Masuda",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480743",
language = "English",
volume = "197",
pages = "705--711",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lymph-node metastases

T2 - Efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer

AU - Fukuya, Tatsuro

AU - Honda, Hiroshi

AU - Hayashi, Takamoto

AU - Kaneko, Kuniyuki

AU - Tateshi, Yuko

AU - Ro, Tokugen

AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko

AU - Tanaka, Masao

AU - Tsuneyoshi, Masazumi

AU - Masuda, Kouji

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of helical computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymphadenopathy in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT (5-mm section thickness, 5-mm/sec table incrementation) was performed in 58 patients (39 men, 19 women; mean age, 63.8 years) with gastric cancer; 1,082 lymph nodes (138 positive, 944 negative for metastasis) were resected at surgery. Findings at CT and resection were compared. Sensitivity for detecting lymph nodes was evaluated according to nodal size and presence of metastasis. RESULTS: Seven (1.1%) of 649 lymph nodes 1-4 mm, 160 (45.1%) of 355 nodes 5-9 mm, and 56 (72%) of 78 nodes larger than 9 mm were detected at CT. For nodes of at least 5 mm, sensitivity for detecting metastasis-positive nodes (79 [75.2%] of 105 nodes) was higher than that for detecting metastasis-negative nodes (137 [41.8%] of 328; P < .01). Differences between positive and negative nodes in CT attenuation (110 HU ± 25 vs 66 HU ± 32) and short-to-long axis ratios (0.81 ± 0.15 vs 0.57 ± 0.15; P < .001) were significant. CONCLUSION: Helical CT is effective for detection of metastatic lymphadenopathy from gastric cancer. CT attenuation and lymph-node configuration aid in diagnosis of malignant adenopathy.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of helical computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymphadenopathy in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT (5-mm section thickness, 5-mm/sec table incrementation) was performed in 58 patients (39 men, 19 women; mean age, 63.8 years) with gastric cancer; 1,082 lymph nodes (138 positive, 944 negative for metastasis) were resected at surgery. Findings at CT and resection were compared. Sensitivity for detecting lymph nodes was evaluated according to nodal size and presence of metastasis. RESULTS: Seven (1.1%) of 649 lymph nodes 1-4 mm, 160 (45.1%) of 355 nodes 5-9 mm, and 56 (72%) of 78 nodes larger than 9 mm were detected at CT. For nodes of at least 5 mm, sensitivity for detecting metastasis-positive nodes (79 [75.2%] of 105 nodes) was higher than that for detecting metastasis-negative nodes (137 [41.8%] of 328; P < .01). Differences between positive and negative nodes in CT attenuation (110 HU ± 25 vs 66 HU ± 32) and short-to-long axis ratios (0.81 ± 0.15 vs 0.57 ± 0.15; P < .001) were significant. CONCLUSION: Helical CT is effective for detection of metastatic lymphadenopathy from gastric cancer. CT attenuation and lymph-node configuration aid in diagnosis of malignant adenopathy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028827326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028827326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480743

DO - 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480743

M3 - Article

C2 - 7480743

AN - SCOPUS:0028827326

VL - 197

SP - 705

EP - 711

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -