TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetic resonance differentiation between T2 and T1 gallbladder carcinoma
T2 - Significance of subserosal enhancement on the delayed phase dynamic study
AU - Yoshimitsu, Kengo
AU - Nishihara, Yunosuke
AU - Okamoto, Daisuke
AU - Ushijima, Yasuhiro
AU - Nishie, Akihiro
AU - Yamaguchi, Koji
AU - Taketomi, Akinobu
AU - Honda, Hiroshi
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate whether subserosal enhancement on the delayed-phase dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) study (SED) can differentiate T2 from T1 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Methods: The institutional research board approved this retrospective study. Between 1997 and 2006, there were surgically proven 11 T1 and 21 T2 GBC in 30 patients, all of whom had undergone preoperative contrast enhanced dynamic MR study, either with a 2D sequence (n=17) or 3D sequences (n=15). All images were reviewed by two radiologists for the presence of SED, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated by consensus. Results: The areas under the ROC curves of the two readers were 0.91 and 0.86, and the kappa value was 0.78. Of the 21 T2 GBC, 18 and 3 showed positive and negative SED, respectively. Of the 11 T1 GBC, 1 and 10 showed positive and negative SED, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of SED for diagnosing T2 lesions were 86%, 88%, 91% and 77%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, SED may be a useful sign to differentiate T2 from T1 GBC, which would affect the preoperative surgical planning of the patients.
AB - Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate whether subserosal enhancement on the delayed-phase dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) study (SED) can differentiate T2 from T1 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Methods: The institutional research board approved this retrospective study. Between 1997 and 2006, there were surgically proven 11 T1 and 21 T2 GBC in 30 patients, all of whom had undergone preoperative contrast enhanced dynamic MR study, either with a 2D sequence (n=17) or 3D sequences (n=15). All images were reviewed by two radiologists for the presence of SED, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated by consensus. Results: The areas under the ROC curves of the two readers were 0.91 and 0.86, and the kappa value was 0.78. Of the 21 T2 GBC, 18 and 3 showed positive and negative SED, respectively. Of the 11 T1 GBC, 1 and 10 showed positive and negative SED, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of SED for diagnosing T2 lesions were 86%, 88%, 91% and 77%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, SED may be a useful sign to differentiate T2 from T1 GBC, which would affect the preoperative surgical planning of the patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861702787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861702787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.016
DO - 10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 22495238
AN - SCOPUS:84861702787
SN - 0730-725X
VL - 30
SP - 854
EP - 859
JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 6
ER -