Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion

S. Tsujitani, T. Okuyama, H. Orita, Y. Kakeji, Yoshihiko Maehara, K. Sugimachi, N. Kaibara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: We retrospectively examined the rate of infiltration of proximal margins of resection in patients resected for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Material and Methods: In the 175 proximal margins examined, the incidence was related to the gross appearance, histologic type, size, depth of invasion, shape of the oral edge, length of grossly tumor-free edge and Length of histologic esophageal invasion. Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that undifferentiated adenocarcinoma and length of histologic esophageal invasion are significant risk factors for positive margin. Infiltration occurred in 13.7% (24 cases) of the oral margins of transection. Eight patients were potentially curative other than positive margin and 5 were caused by underestimation of the distance of oral margin. With reference to the length of margin of resection, no involvement was found when the cranial distance between the Lesion and the line of transection exceeded 2 cm in patients with orally well-defined type esophageal invasion. In patients with the orally ill-defined type, transection with a distance greater than 4 cm commonly guarantee safety of the proximal margin, except for cases with lymphatic invasion. Conclusions: These data provide the surgeon with a rational basis for assessing the extent of resection when performing esophagectomy combined with gastrectomy for cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-877
Number of pages5
JournalHepato-Gastroenterology
Volume42
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 1995

Fingerprint

Esophageal Neoplasms
Stomach Neoplasms
Esophagectomy
Gastrectomy
Neoplasms
Adenocarcinoma
Multivariate Analysis
Safety
Margins of Excision
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Tsujitani, S., Okuyama, T., Orita, H., Kakeji, Y., Maehara, Y., Sugimachi, K., & Kaibara, N. (1995). Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 42(6), 873-877.

Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. / Tsujitani, S.; Okuyama, T.; Orita, H.; Kakeji, Y.; Maehara, Yoshihiko; Sugimachi, K.; Kaibara, N.

In: Hepato-Gastroenterology, Vol. 42, No. 6, 01.12.1995, p. 873-877.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsujitani, S, Okuyama, T, Orita, H, Kakeji, Y, Maehara, Y, Sugimachi, K & Kaibara, N 1995, 'Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion', Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 873-877.
Tsujitani S, Okuyama T, Orita H, Kakeji Y, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K et al. Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1995 Dec 1;42(6):873-877.
Tsujitani, S. ; Okuyama, T. ; Orita, H. ; Kakeji, Y. ; Maehara, Yoshihiko ; Sugimachi, K. ; Kaibara, N. / Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. In: Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1995 ; Vol. 42, No. 6. pp. 873-877.
@article{398c499af3014a47a34d9f0be40b0d76,
title = "Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion",
abstract = "Background/Aims: We retrospectively examined the rate of infiltration of proximal margins of resection in patients resected for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Material and Methods: In the 175 proximal margins examined, the incidence was related to the gross appearance, histologic type, size, depth of invasion, shape of the oral edge, length of grossly tumor-free edge and Length of histologic esophageal invasion. Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that undifferentiated adenocarcinoma and length of histologic esophageal invasion are significant risk factors for positive margin. Infiltration occurred in 13.7{\%} (24 cases) of the oral margins of transection. Eight patients were potentially curative other than positive margin and 5 were caused by underestimation of the distance of oral margin. With reference to the length of margin of resection, no involvement was found when the cranial distance between the Lesion and the line of transection exceeded 2 cm in patients with orally well-defined type esophageal invasion. In patients with the orally ill-defined type, transection with a distance greater than 4 cm commonly guarantee safety of the proximal margin, except for cases with lymphatic invasion. Conclusions: These data provide the surgeon with a rational basis for assessing the extent of resection when performing esophagectomy combined with gastrectomy for cancer.",
author = "S. Tsujitani and T. Okuyama and H. Orita and Y. Kakeji and Yoshihiko Maehara and K. Sugimachi and N. Kaibara",
year = "1995",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "873--877",
journal = "Acta hepato-splenologica",
issn = "0172-6390",
publisher = "H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Margins of resection of the esophagus for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion

AU - Tsujitani, S.

AU - Okuyama, T.

AU - Orita, H.

AU - Kakeji, Y.

AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko

AU - Sugimachi, K.

AU - Kaibara, N.

PY - 1995/12/1

Y1 - 1995/12/1

N2 - Background/Aims: We retrospectively examined the rate of infiltration of proximal margins of resection in patients resected for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Material and Methods: In the 175 proximal margins examined, the incidence was related to the gross appearance, histologic type, size, depth of invasion, shape of the oral edge, length of grossly tumor-free edge and Length of histologic esophageal invasion. Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that undifferentiated adenocarcinoma and length of histologic esophageal invasion are significant risk factors for positive margin. Infiltration occurred in 13.7% (24 cases) of the oral margins of transection. Eight patients were potentially curative other than positive margin and 5 were caused by underestimation of the distance of oral margin. With reference to the length of margin of resection, no involvement was found when the cranial distance between the Lesion and the line of transection exceeded 2 cm in patients with orally well-defined type esophageal invasion. In patients with the orally ill-defined type, transection with a distance greater than 4 cm commonly guarantee safety of the proximal margin, except for cases with lymphatic invasion. Conclusions: These data provide the surgeon with a rational basis for assessing the extent of resection when performing esophagectomy combined with gastrectomy for cancer.

AB - Background/Aims: We retrospectively examined the rate of infiltration of proximal margins of resection in patients resected for gastric cancer with esophageal invasion. Material and Methods: In the 175 proximal margins examined, the incidence was related to the gross appearance, histologic type, size, depth of invasion, shape of the oral edge, length of grossly tumor-free edge and Length of histologic esophageal invasion. Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that undifferentiated adenocarcinoma and length of histologic esophageal invasion are significant risk factors for positive margin. Infiltration occurred in 13.7% (24 cases) of the oral margins of transection. Eight patients were potentially curative other than positive margin and 5 were caused by underestimation of the distance of oral margin. With reference to the length of margin of resection, no involvement was found when the cranial distance between the Lesion and the line of transection exceeded 2 cm in patients with orally well-defined type esophageal invasion. In patients with the orally ill-defined type, transection with a distance greater than 4 cm commonly guarantee safety of the proximal margin, except for cases with lymphatic invasion. Conclusions: These data provide the surgeon with a rational basis for assessing the extent of resection when performing esophagectomy combined with gastrectomy for cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029560906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029560906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 873

EP - 877

JO - Acta hepato-splenologica

JF - Acta hepato-splenologica

SN - 0172-6390

IS - 6

ER -