Medical Radiation Exposure among Atomic Bomb Survivors: Understanding its Impact on Risk Estimates of Atomic Bomb Radiation

Atsuko Sadakane, Reid D. Landes, Ritsu Sakata, Jun Nagano, Roy E. Shore, Kotaro Ozasa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There have been some concerns about the influence of medical X rays in dose-response analysis of atomic bomb radiation on health outcomes. Among atomic bomb survivors in the Life Span Study, the association between atomic bomb radiation dose and exposures to medical X rays was investigated using questionnaire data collected by a mail survey conducted between 2007-2011, soliciting information on the history of computed tomography (CT) scans, gastrointestinal fluoroscopy, angiography and radiotherapy. Among 12,670 participants, 76% received at least one CT scan; 77%, a fluoroscopic examination; 23%, an angiographic examination; and 8%, radiotherapy. Descriptive and multivariable-adjusted analyses showed that medical X rays were administered in greater frequencies among those who were exposed to an atomic bomb radiation dose of 1.0 Gy or higher, compared to those exposed to lower doses. This is possibly explained by a greater frequency in major chronic diseases such as cancer in the ≥1.0 Gy group. The frequency of medical X rays in the groups exposed to 0.005-0.1 Gy or 0.1-1.0 Gy did not differ significantly from those exposed to <0.005 Gy. An analysis of finer dose groups under 1 Gy likewise showed no differences in frequencies of medical X rays. Thus, no evidence of material confounding of atomic bomb effects was found. Among those exposed to atomic bomb doses <1 Gy, doses were not associated with medical radiation exposures. The significant association of doses ≥1 Gy with medical radiation exposures likely produces no substantive bias in radiation effect estimates because diagnostic medical X-ray doses are much lower than the atomic bomb doses. Further information on actual medical X-ray doses and on the validity of self-reports of X-ray procedures would strengthen this conclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-517
Number of pages11
JournalRadiation Research
Volume191
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

fission weapons
Nuclear Weapons
radiation dosage
Survivors
X-Rays
Radiation
dosage
radiation
estimates
x rays
Radiotherapy
Tomography
Fluoroscopy
Radiation Effects
Postal Service
radiation therapy
Radiation Exposure
tomography
examination
Radiography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Radiation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Medical Radiation Exposure among Atomic Bomb Survivors : Understanding its Impact on Risk Estimates of Atomic Bomb Radiation. / Sadakane, Atsuko; Landes, Reid D.; Sakata, Ritsu; Nagano, Jun; Shore, Roy E.; Ozasa, Kotaro.

In: Radiation Research, Vol. 191, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 507-517.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sadakane, Atsuko ; Landes, Reid D. ; Sakata, Ritsu ; Nagano, Jun ; Shore, Roy E. ; Ozasa, Kotaro. / Medical Radiation Exposure among Atomic Bomb Survivors : Understanding its Impact on Risk Estimates of Atomic Bomb Radiation. In: Radiation Research. 2019 ; Vol. 191, No. 6. pp. 507-517.
@article{1098f207a51c43679b50b9132765fcdd,
title = "Medical Radiation Exposure among Atomic Bomb Survivors: Understanding its Impact on Risk Estimates of Atomic Bomb Radiation",
abstract = "There have been some concerns about the influence of medical X rays in dose-response analysis of atomic bomb radiation on health outcomes. Among atomic bomb survivors in the Life Span Study, the association between atomic bomb radiation dose and exposures to medical X rays was investigated using questionnaire data collected by a mail survey conducted between 2007-2011, soliciting information on the history of computed tomography (CT) scans, gastrointestinal fluoroscopy, angiography and radiotherapy. Among 12,670 participants, 76{\%} received at least one CT scan; 77{\%}, a fluoroscopic examination; 23{\%}, an angiographic examination; and 8{\%}, radiotherapy. Descriptive and multivariable-adjusted analyses showed that medical X rays were administered in greater frequencies among those who were exposed to an atomic bomb radiation dose of 1.0 Gy or higher, compared to those exposed to lower doses. This is possibly explained by a greater frequency in major chronic diseases such as cancer in the ≥1.0 Gy group. The frequency of medical X rays in the groups exposed to 0.005-0.1 Gy or 0.1-1.0 Gy did not differ significantly from those exposed to <0.005 Gy. An analysis of finer dose groups under 1 Gy likewise showed no differences in frequencies of medical X rays. Thus, no evidence of material confounding of atomic bomb effects was found. Among those exposed to atomic bomb doses <1 Gy, doses were not associated with medical radiation exposures. The significant association of doses ≥1 Gy with medical radiation exposures likely produces no substantive bias in radiation effect estimates because diagnostic medical X-ray doses are much lower than the atomic bomb doses. Further information on actual medical X-ray doses and on the validity of self-reports of X-ray procedures would strengthen this conclusion.",
author = "Atsuko Sadakane and Landes, {Reid D.} and Ritsu Sakata and Jun Nagano and Shore, {Roy E.} and Kotaro Ozasa",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1667/RR15054.1",
language = "English",
volume = "191",
pages = "507--517",
journal = "Radiation Research",
issn = "0033-7587",
publisher = "Radiation Research Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical Radiation Exposure among Atomic Bomb Survivors

T2 - Understanding its Impact on Risk Estimates of Atomic Bomb Radiation

AU - Sadakane, Atsuko

AU - Landes, Reid D.

AU - Sakata, Ritsu

AU - Nagano, Jun

AU - Shore, Roy E.

AU - Ozasa, Kotaro

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - There have been some concerns about the influence of medical X rays in dose-response analysis of atomic bomb radiation on health outcomes. Among atomic bomb survivors in the Life Span Study, the association between atomic bomb radiation dose and exposures to medical X rays was investigated using questionnaire data collected by a mail survey conducted between 2007-2011, soliciting information on the history of computed tomography (CT) scans, gastrointestinal fluoroscopy, angiography and radiotherapy. Among 12,670 participants, 76% received at least one CT scan; 77%, a fluoroscopic examination; 23%, an angiographic examination; and 8%, radiotherapy. Descriptive and multivariable-adjusted analyses showed that medical X rays were administered in greater frequencies among those who were exposed to an atomic bomb radiation dose of 1.0 Gy or higher, compared to those exposed to lower doses. This is possibly explained by a greater frequency in major chronic diseases such as cancer in the ≥1.0 Gy group. The frequency of medical X rays in the groups exposed to 0.005-0.1 Gy or 0.1-1.0 Gy did not differ significantly from those exposed to <0.005 Gy. An analysis of finer dose groups under 1 Gy likewise showed no differences in frequencies of medical X rays. Thus, no evidence of material confounding of atomic bomb effects was found. Among those exposed to atomic bomb doses <1 Gy, doses were not associated with medical radiation exposures. The significant association of doses ≥1 Gy with medical radiation exposures likely produces no substantive bias in radiation effect estimates because diagnostic medical X-ray doses are much lower than the atomic bomb doses. Further information on actual medical X-ray doses and on the validity of self-reports of X-ray procedures would strengthen this conclusion.

AB - There have been some concerns about the influence of medical X rays in dose-response analysis of atomic bomb radiation on health outcomes. Among atomic bomb survivors in the Life Span Study, the association between atomic bomb radiation dose and exposures to medical X rays was investigated using questionnaire data collected by a mail survey conducted between 2007-2011, soliciting information on the history of computed tomography (CT) scans, gastrointestinal fluoroscopy, angiography and radiotherapy. Among 12,670 participants, 76% received at least one CT scan; 77%, a fluoroscopic examination; 23%, an angiographic examination; and 8%, radiotherapy. Descriptive and multivariable-adjusted analyses showed that medical X rays were administered in greater frequencies among those who were exposed to an atomic bomb radiation dose of 1.0 Gy or higher, compared to those exposed to lower doses. This is possibly explained by a greater frequency in major chronic diseases such as cancer in the ≥1.0 Gy group. The frequency of medical X rays in the groups exposed to 0.005-0.1 Gy or 0.1-1.0 Gy did not differ significantly from those exposed to <0.005 Gy. An analysis of finer dose groups under 1 Gy likewise showed no differences in frequencies of medical X rays. Thus, no evidence of material confounding of atomic bomb effects was found. Among those exposed to atomic bomb doses <1 Gy, doses were not associated with medical radiation exposures. The significant association of doses ≥1 Gy with medical radiation exposures likely produces no substantive bias in radiation effect estimates because diagnostic medical X-ray doses are much lower than the atomic bomb doses. Further information on actual medical X-ray doses and on the validity of self-reports of X-ray procedures would strengthen this conclusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066814070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066814070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1667/RR15054.1

DO - 10.1667/RR15054.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 30925137

AN - SCOPUS:85066814070

VL - 191

SP - 507

EP - 517

JO - Radiation Research

JF - Radiation Research

SN - 0033-7587

IS - 6

ER -