TY - JOUR
T1 - Megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome
T2 - In utero sonographic appearance and the contribution of vesicocentesis in antenatal diagnosis
AU - Hidaka, Nobuhiro
AU - Kawamata, Kazuya
AU - Chiba, Yoshihide
PY - 2006/6
Y1 - 2006/6
N2 - Objective. The purpose of this report is to describe the in utero sonographic appearance of megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome (MMIHS) and examine the role of vesicocentesis. Methods. Two cases of the sonographic appearance of MMIHS were reviewed. We performed vesicocentesis in 2 fetuses with MMIHS and performed vesicoamniotic shunting in 1 of them. The sonographic findings after these procedures were compared with those before puncture. Results. In both cases, ultrasound examination showed a massively enlarged fetal bladder and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis with a normal amount of amniotic fluid. Fetal urinary sodium and chloride concentrations were within normal limits in both cases; this suggested normal fetal renal function. Generally, it is difficult to detect the dilated fetal bowel in MMIHS, probably because of the disturbance caused by a large bladder. In our cases, however, the ultrasound examination clearly showed fetal bowel dilatation after these procedures; this made the antenatal diagnosis of MMIHS more definite. Conclusions. The sonographic features after vesicocentesis may be helpful in confirming the antenatal diagnosis of MMIHS.
AB - Objective. The purpose of this report is to describe the in utero sonographic appearance of megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome (MMIHS) and examine the role of vesicocentesis. Methods. Two cases of the sonographic appearance of MMIHS were reviewed. We performed vesicocentesis in 2 fetuses with MMIHS and performed vesicoamniotic shunting in 1 of them. The sonographic findings after these procedures were compared with those before puncture. Results. In both cases, ultrasound examination showed a massively enlarged fetal bladder and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis with a normal amount of amniotic fluid. Fetal urinary sodium and chloride concentrations were within normal limits in both cases; this suggested normal fetal renal function. Generally, it is difficult to detect the dilated fetal bowel in MMIHS, probably because of the disturbance caused by a large bladder. In our cases, however, the ultrasound examination clearly showed fetal bowel dilatation after these procedures; this made the antenatal diagnosis of MMIHS more definite. Conclusions. The sonographic features after vesicocentesis may be helpful in confirming the antenatal diagnosis of MMIHS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744819472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744819472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.765
DO - 10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.765
M3 - Article
C2 - 16731893
AN - SCOPUS:33744819472
SN - 0278-4297
VL - 25
SP - 765
EP - 769
JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
IS - 6
ER -