Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty

A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation

John M. Wright, Heber C. Crockett, Sam Delgado, Leonard Lyman Stephen, Mike Madsen, Thomas P. Sculco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

144 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A group of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through an abridged surgical incision (group 1) was prospectively compared to a cohort of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through a standard surgical incision (group 2). The length of the incision was 8.8 ± 1.5 cm for group 1 and 23.0 ± 2.1 cm for group 2. The groups were not significantly different with respect to age, height, preoperative Harris Hip scores (HHS), estimated blood loss, or length of hospital stay (P>.05). Group 1 patients had a lower body mass index than group 2 patients (P<.01). Length of surgery was slightly less for group I (P = .02). A 0% incidence was found of infection, nerve palsy, component malposition, and aseptic loosening in both groups. No dislocations occurred in group 1, and one dislocation occurred in group 2. Patients in group 1 have expressed considerable enthusiasm regarding the cosmetic appearance of the surgical incisions, and their postoperative HHS are slightly higher than those of group 2 (P = .042). Total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely and effectively through an abridged surgical incision, but this investigation confirms no dramatic clinical benefit other than cosmetic appeal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)538-545
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Hip
Cosmetics
Length of Stay
Paralysis
Body Mass Index
Surgical Wound
Incidence
Infection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty : A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. / Wright, John M.; Crockett, Heber C.; Delgado, Sam; Lyman Stephen, Leonard; Madsen, Mike; Sculco, Thomas P.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 19, No. 5, 01.08.2004, p. 538-545.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wright, John M. ; Crockett, Heber C. ; Delgado, Sam ; Lyman Stephen, Leonard ; Madsen, Mike ; Sculco, Thomas P. / Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty : A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 538-545.
@article{fb34607cfb31496eb98ddb8405e5048f,
title = "Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation",
abstract = "A group of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through an abridged surgical incision (group 1) was prospectively compared to a cohort of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through a standard surgical incision (group 2). The length of the incision was 8.8 ± 1.5 cm for group 1 and 23.0 ± 2.1 cm for group 2. The groups were not significantly different with respect to age, height, preoperative Harris Hip scores (HHS), estimated blood loss, or length of hospital stay (P>.05). Group 1 patients had a lower body mass index than group 2 patients (P<.01). Length of surgery was slightly less for group I (P = .02). A 0{\%} incidence was found of infection, nerve palsy, component malposition, and aseptic loosening in both groups. No dislocations occurred in group 1, and one dislocation occurred in group 2. Patients in group 1 have expressed considerable enthusiasm regarding the cosmetic appearance of the surgical incisions, and their postoperative HHS are slightly higher than those of group 2 (P = .042). Total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely and effectively through an abridged surgical incision, but this investigation confirms no dramatic clinical benefit other than cosmetic appeal.",
author = "Wright, {John M.} and Crockett, {Heber C.} and Sam Delgado and {Lyman Stephen}, Leonard and Mike Madsen and Sculco, {Thomas P.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.070",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "538--545",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty

T2 - A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation

AU - Wright, John M.

AU - Crockett, Heber C.

AU - Delgado, Sam

AU - Lyman Stephen, Leonard

AU - Madsen, Mike

AU - Sculco, Thomas P.

PY - 2004/8/1

Y1 - 2004/8/1

N2 - A group of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through an abridged surgical incision (group 1) was prospectively compared to a cohort of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through a standard surgical incision (group 2). The length of the incision was 8.8 ± 1.5 cm for group 1 and 23.0 ± 2.1 cm for group 2. The groups were not significantly different with respect to age, height, preoperative Harris Hip scores (HHS), estimated blood loss, or length of hospital stay (P>.05). Group 1 patients had a lower body mass index than group 2 patients (P<.01). Length of surgery was slightly less for group I (P = .02). A 0% incidence was found of infection, nerve palsy, component malposition, and aseptic loosening in both groups. No dislocations occurred in group 1, and one dislocation occurred in group 2. Patients in group 1 have expressed considerable enthusiasm regarding the cosmetic appearance of the surgical incisions, and their postoperative HHS are slightly higher than those of group 2 (P = .042). Total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely and effectively through an abridged surgical incision, but this investigation confirms no dramatic clinical benefit other than cosmetic appeal.

AB - A group of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through an abridged surgical incision (group 1) was prospectively compared to a cohort of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through a standard surgical incision (group 2). The length of the incision was 8.8 ± 1.5 cm for group 1 and 23.0 ± 2.1 cm for group 2. The groups were not significantly different with respect to age, height, preoperative Harris Hip scores (HHS), estimated blood loss, or length of hospital stay (P>.05). Group 1 patients had a lower body mass index than group 2 patients (P<.01). Length of surgery was slightly less for group I (P = .02). A 0% incidence was found of infection, nerve palsy, component malposition, and aseptic loosening in both groups. No dislocations occurred in group 1, and one dislocation occurred in group 2. Patients in group 1 have expressed considerable enthusiasm regarding the cosmetic appearance of the surgical incisions, and their postoperative HHS are slightly higher than those of group 2 (P = .042). Total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely and effectively through an abridged surgical incision, but this investigation confirms no dramatic clinical benefit other than cosmetic appeal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3342974412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3342974412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.070

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.070

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 538

EP - 545

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 5

ER -