Minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Hirokazu Noshiro, Eishi Nagai, Shuji Shimizu, Akihiko Uchiyama, Masayuki Kojima, Masao Tanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy is considered one of the best treatments for thoracic esophageal carcinoma because the disease is aggressive and lymph node metastasis is common. However, the efficacy of the procedure remains unclear, and it is associated with high postoperative mortality and morbidity. Methods. Seventy patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. We retrospectively reviewed our procedure and the short-term surgical outcome of both thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Results. In 70 patients, duration of the thoracoscopic and total procedure was 229 ± 50 min and 581 ± 82 min, respectively. For all procedures, estimated blood loss was 447 ± 227 g. Overall mortality was 1%. Postoperative major complications occurred in 18 patients (26%), and respiratory complications occurred in 11 patients (16%). Conclusion. Radical esophagectomy via thoracoscopy and laparoscopy is technically safe and feasible. We consider that the superior visualization and magnified view provided by thoracoscopy and the smaller surgical wounds in thorax and abdomen will prove advantageous to the postoperative clinical course and surgical outcome in spite of the longer operation time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-65
Number of pages7
JournalEsophagus
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

Esophagectomy
Esophageal Neoplasms
Thoracoscopy
Lymph Node Excision
Thorax
Carcinoma
Mortality
Abdomen
Laparoscopy
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Morbidity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Noshiro, H., Nagai, E., Shimizu, S., Uchiyama, A., Kojima, M., & Tanaka, M. (2007). Minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Esophagus, 4(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-007-0109-9

Minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. / Noshiro, Hirokazu; Nagai, Eishi; Shimizu, Shuji; Uchiyama, Akihiko; Kojima, Masayuki; Tanaka, Masao.

In: Esophagus, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.06.2007, p. 59-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Noshiro, H, Nagai, E, Shimizu, S, Uchiyama, A, Kojima, M & Tanaka, M 2007, 'Minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer', Esophagus, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-007-0109-9
Noshiro, Hirokazu ; Nagai, Eishi ; Shimizu, Shuji ; Uchiyama, Akihiko ; Kojima, Masayuki ; Tanaka, Masao. / Minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. In: Esophagus. 2007 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 59-65.
@article{5fe0dc97b2d44ed98a491a0fcb3fcee0,
title = "Minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer",
abstract = "Background. Thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy is considered one of the best treatments for thoracic esophageal carcinoma because the disease is aggressive and lymph node metastasis is common. However, the efficacy of the procedure remains unclear, and it is associated with high postoperative mortality and morbidity. Methods. Seventy patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. We retrospectively reviewed our procedure and the short-term surgical outcome of both thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Results. In 70 patients, duration of the thoracoscopic and total procedure was 229 ± 50 min and 581 ± 82 min, respectively. For all procedures, estimated blood loss was 447 ± 227 g. Overall mortality was 1{\%}. Postoperative major complications occurred in 18 patients (26{\%}), and respiratory complications occurred in 11 patients (16{\%}). Conclusion. Radical esophagectomy via thoracoscopy and laparoscopy is technically safe and feasible. We consider that the superior visualization and magnified view provided by thoracoscopy and the smaller surgical wounds in thorax and abdomen will prove advantageous to the postoperative clinical course and surgical outcome in spite of the longer operation time.",
author = "Hirokazu Noshiro and Eishi Nagai and Shuji Shimizu and Akihiko Uchiyama and Masayuki Kojima and Masao Tanaka",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10388-007-0109-9",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "59--65",
journal = "Esophagus",
issn = "1612-9059",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

AU - Noshiro, Hirokazu

AU - Nagai, Eishi

AU - Shimizu, Shuji

AU - Uchiyama, Akihiko

AU - Kojima, Masayuki

AU - Tanaka, Masao

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Background. Thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy is considered one of the best treatments for thoracic esophageal carcinoma because the disease is aggressive and lymph node metastasis is common. However, the efficacy of the procedure remains unclear, and it is associated with high postoperative mortality and morbidity. Methods. Seventy patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. We retrospectively reviewed our procedure and the short-term surgical outcome of both thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Results. In 70 patients, duration of the thoracoscopic and total procedure was 229 ± 50 min and 581 ± 82 min, respectively. For all procedures, estimated blood loss was 447 ± 227 g. Overall mortality was 1%. Postoperative major complications occurred in 18 patients (26%), and respiratory complications occurred in 11 patients (16%). Conclusion. Radical esophagectomy via thoracoscopy and laparoscopy is technically safe and feasible. We consider that the superior visualization and magnified view provided by thoracoscopy and the smaller surgical wounds in thorax and abdomen will prove advantageous to the postoperative clinical course and surgical outcome in spite of the longer operation time.

AB - Background. Thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy is considered one of the best treatments for thoracic esophageal carcinoma because the disease is aggressive and lymph node metastasis is common. However, the efficacy of the procedure remains unclear, and it is associated with high postoperative mortality and morbidity. Methods. Seventy patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. We retrospectively reviewed our procedure and the short-term surgical outcome of both thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Results. In 70 patients, duration of the thoracoscopic and total procedure was 229 ± 50 min and 581 ± 82 min, respectively. For all procedures, estimated blood loss was 447 ± 227 g. Overall mortality was 1%. Postoperative major complications occurred in 18 patients (26%), and respiratory complications occurred in 11 patients (16%). Conclusion. Radical esophagectomy via thoracoscopy and laparoscopy is technically safe and feasible. We consider that the superior visualization and magnified view provided by thoracoscopy and the smaller surgical wounds in thorax and abdomen will prove advantageous to the postoperative clinical course and surgical outcome in spite of the longer operation time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250881513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250881513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10388-007-0109-9

DO - 10.1007/s10388-007-0109-9

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 59

EP - 65

JO - Esophagus

JF - Esophagus

SN - 1612-9059

IS - 2

ER -