Model evaluation and intercomparison of surface-level ozone and relevant species in East Asia in the context of MICS-Asia Phase III - Part 1: Overview

Jie Li, Tatsuya Nagashima, Lei Kong, Baozhu Ge, Kazuyo Yamaji, Joshua S. Fu, Xuemei Wang, Qi Fan, Syuichi Itahashi, Hyo Jung Lee, Cheol Hee Kim, Chuan Yao Lin, Meigen Zhang, Zhining Tao, Mizuo Kajino, Hong Liao, Meng Li, Jung Hun Woo, Jun Ichi Kurokawa, Zhe WangQizhong Wu, Hajime Akimoto, Gregory R. Carmichael, Zifa Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatiotemporal variations of ozone (<span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span>) and nitrogen oxide (<span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">NOx</span>) mixing ratios from 14 state-of-the-art chemical transport models (CTMs) are intercompared and evaluated with <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> observations in East Asia, within the framework of the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia Phase III (MICS-Asia III). This study was designed to evaluate the capabilities and uncertainties of current CTMs simulations for Asia and to provide multi-model estimates of pollutant distributions. These models were run by 14 independent groups working in China, Japan, South Korea, the United States and other countries/regions. Compared with the previous phase of MICS-Asia (MICS-Asia II), the evaluation with observations was extended from 4 months to 1 full year across China and the western Pacific Rim. In general, model performance levels for <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> varied widely by region and season. Most models captured the key patterns of monthly and diurnal variation of surface <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> and its precursors in the North China Plain and western Pacific Rim but failed to do so for the Pearl River Delta. A significant overestimation of surface <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> was evident from May to September/October and from January to May over the North China Plain, the western Pacific Rim and the Pearl River Delta. Comparisons drawn from observations show that the considerable diversity in <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> photochemical production partly contributed to this overestimation and to high levels of inter-model variability in <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> for North China. In terms of <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> soundings, the ensemble average of models reproduced the vertical structure for the western Pacific, but overestimated <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> levels to below 800&thinsp;hPa in the summer. In the industrialized Pearl River Delta, the ensemble average presented an overestimation for the lower troposphere and an underestimation for the middle troposphere. The ensemble average of 13 models for <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> did not always exhibit superior performance compared with certain individual models in contrast with its superior value for Europe. This finding suggests that the spread of ensemble-model values does not represent all of the uncertainties of <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> or that most MICS-Asia III models missed key processes. This study improved the performance of modeling <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> in March at Japanese sites compared with MICS-Asia II. However, it overpredicted surface <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> concentrations for western Japan in July, which was not found by MICS-Asia II. Major challenges still remain with regard to identifying the sources of bias in surface <span classCombining double low line"inline-formula">O3</span> over East Asia in CTMs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12993-13015
Number of pages23
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume19
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 21 2019

Fingerprint

ozone
Asia
evaluation
troposphere
river
nitrogen oxides
mixing ratio
diurnal variation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Model evaluation and intercomparison of surface-level ozone and relevant species in East Asia in the context of MICS-Asia Phase III - Part 1 : Overview. / Li, Jie; Nagashima, Tatsuya; Kong, Lei; Ge, Baozhu; Yamaji, Kazuyo; Fu, Joshua S.; Wang, Xuemei; Fan, Qi; Itahashi, Syuichi; Lee, Hyo Jung; Kim, Cheol Hee; Lin, Chuan Yao; Zhang, Meigen; Tao, Zhining; Kajino, Mizuo; Liao, Hong; Li, Meng; Woo, Jung Hun; Kurokawa, Jun Ichi; Wang, Zhe; Wu, Qizhong; Akimoto, Hajime; Carmichael, Gregory R.; Wang, Zifa.

In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, No. 20, 21.10.2019, p. 12993-13015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, J, Nagashima, T, Kong, L, Ge, B, Yamaji, K, Fu, JS, Wang, X, Fan, Q, Itahashi, S, Lee, HJ, Kim, CH, Lin, CY, Zhang, M, Tao, Z, Kajino, M, Liao, H, Li, M, Woo, JH, Kurokawa, JI, Wang, Z, Wu, Q, Akimoto, H, Carmichael, GR & Wang, Z 2019, 'Model evaluation and intercomparison of surface-level ozone and relevant species in East Asia in the context of MICS-Asia Phase III - Part 1: Overview', Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 12993-13015. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12993-2019
Li, Jie ; Nagashima, Tatsuya ; Kong, Lei ; Ge, Baozhu ; Yamaji, Kazuyo ; Fu, Joshua S. ; Wang, Xuemei ; Fan, Qi ; Itahashi, Syuichi ; Lee, Hyo Jung ; Kim, Cheol Hee ; Lin, Chuan Yao ; Zhang, Meigen ; Tao, Zhining ; Kajino, Mizuo ; Liao, Hong ; Li, Meng ; Woo, Jung Hun ; Kurokawa, Jun Ichi ; Wang, Zhe ; Wu, Qizhong ; Akimoto, Hajime ; Carmichael, Gregory R. ; Wang, Zifa. / Model evaluation and intercomparison of surface-level ozone and relevant species in East Asia in the context of MICS-Asia Phase III - Part 1 : Overview. In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 20. pp. 12993-13015.
@article{231850ef5d714c31bd471883e7f4a303,
title = "Model evaluation and intercomparison of surface-level ozone and relevant species in East Asia in the context of MICS-Asia Phase III - Part 1: Overview",
abstract = "Spatiotemporal variations of ozone (O3) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) mixing ratios from 14 state-of-the-art chemical transport models (CTMs) are intercompared and evaluated with O3 observations in East Asia, within the framework of the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia Phase III (MICS-Asia III). This study was designed to evaluate the capabilities and uncertainties of current CTMs simulations for Asia and to provide multi-model estimates of pollutant distributions. These models were run by 14 independent groups working in China, Japan, South Korea, the United States and other countries/regions. Compared with the previous phase of MICS-Asia (MICS-Asia II), the evaluation with observations was extended from 4 months to 1 full year across China and the western Pacific Rim. In general, model performance levels for O3 varied widely by region and season. Most models captured the key patterns of monthly and diurnal variation of surface O3 and its precursors in the North China Plain and western Pacific Rim but failed to do so for the Pearl River Delta. A significant overestimation of surface O3 was evident from May to September/October and from January to May over the North China Plain, the western Pacific Rim and the Pearl River Delta. Comparisons drawn from observations show that the considerable diversity in O3 photochemical production partly contributed to this overestimation and to high levels of inter-model variability in O3 for North China. In terms of O3 soundings, the ensemble average of models reproduced the vertical structure for the western Pacific, but overestimated O3 levels to below 800&thinsp;hPa in the summer. In the industrialized Pearl River Delta, the ensemble average presented an overestimation for the lower troposphere and an underestimation for the middle troposphere. The ensemble average of 13 models for O3 did not always exhibit superior performance compared with certain individual models in contrast with its superior value for Europe. This finding suggests that the spread of ensemble-model values does not represent all of the uncertainties of O3 or that most MICS-Asia III models missed key processes. This study improved the performance of modeling O3 in March at Japanese sites compared with MICS-Asia II. However, it overpredicted surface O3 concentrations for western Japan in July, which was not found by MICS-Asia II. Major challenges still remain with regard to identifying the sources of bias in surface O3 over East Asia in CTMs.",
author = "Jie Li and Tatsuya Nagashima and Lei Kong and Baozhu Ge and Kazuyo Yamaji and Fu, {Joshua S.} and Xuemei Wang and Qi Fan and Syuichi Itahashi and Lee, {Hyo Jung} and Kim, {Cheol Hee} and Lin, {Chuan Yao} and Meigen Zhang and Zhining Tao and Mizuo Kajino and Hong Liao and Meng Li and Woo, {Jung Hun} and Kurokawa, {Jun Ichi} and Zhe Wang and Qizhong Wu and Hajime Akimoto and Carmichael, {Gregory R.} and Zifa Wang",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "21",
doi = "10.5194/acp-19-12993-2019",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "12993--13015",
journal = "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics",
issn = "1680-7316",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Model evaluation and intercomparison of surface-level ozone and relevant species in East Asia in the context of MICS-Asia Phase III - Part 1

T2 - Overview

AU - Li, Jie

AU - Nagashima, Tatsuya

AU - Kong, Lei

AU - Ge, Baozhu

AU - Yamaji, Kazuyo

AU - Fu, Joshua S.

AU - Wang, Xuemei

AU - Fan, Qi

AU - Itahashi, Syuichi

AU - Lee, Hyo Jung

AU - Kim, Cheol Hee

AU - Lin, Chuan Yao

AU - Zhang, Meigen

AU - Tao, Zhining

AU - Kajino, Mizuo

AU - Liao, Hong

AU - Li, Meng

AU - Woo, Jung Hun

AU - Kurokawa, Jun Ichi

AU - Wang, Zhe

AU - Wu, Qizhong

AU - Akimoto, Hajime

AU - Carmichael, Gregory R.

AU - Wang, Zifa

PY - 2019/10/21

Y1 - 2019/10/21

N2 - Spatiotemporal variations of ozone (O3) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) mixing ratios from 14 state-of-the-art chemical transport models (CTMs) are intercompared and evaluated with O3 observations in East Asia, within the framework of the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia Phase III (MICS-Asia III). This study was designed to evaluate the capabilities and uncertainties of current CTMs simulations for Asia and to provide multi-model estimates of pollutant distributions. These models were run by 14 independent groups working in China, Japan, South Korea, the United States and other countries/regions. Compared with the previous phase of MICS-Asia (MICS-Asia II), the evaluation with observations was extended from 4 months to 1 full year across China and the western Pacific Rim. In general, model performance levels for O3 varied widely by region and season. Most models captured the key patterns of monthly and diurnal variation of surface O3 and its precursors in the North China Plain and western Pacific Rim but failed to do so for the Pearl River Delta. A significant overestimation of surface O3 was evident from May to September/October and from January to May over the North China Plain, the western Pacific Rim and the Pearl River Delta. Comparisons drawn from observations show that the considerable diversity in O3 photochemical production partly contributed to this overestimation and to high levels of inter-model variability in O3 for North China. In terms of O3 soundings, the ensemble average of models reproduced the vertical structure for the western Pacific, but overestimated O3 levels to below 800&thinsp;hPa in the summer. In the industrialized Pearl River Delta, the ensemble average presented an overestimation for the lower troposphere and an underestimation for the middle troposphere. The ensemble average of 13 models for O3 did not always exhibit superior performance compared with certain individual models in contrast with its superior value for Europe. This finding suggests that the spread of ensemble-model values does not represent all of the uncertainties of O3 or that most MICS-Asia III models missed key processes. This study improved the performance of modeling O3 in March at Japanese sites compared with MICS-Asia II. However, it overpredicted surface O3 concentrations for western Japan in July, which was not found by MICS-Asia II. Major challenges still remain with regard to identifying the sources of bias in surface O3 over East Asia in CTMs.

AB - Spatiotemporal variations of ozone (O3) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) mixing ratios from 14 state-of-the-art chemical transport models (CTMs) are intercompared and evaluated with O3 observations in East Asia, within the framework of the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia Phase III (MICS-Asia III). This study was designed to evaluate the capabilities and uncertainties of current CTMs simulations for Asia and to provide multi-model estimates of pollutant distributions. These models were run by 14 independent groups working in China, Japan, South Korea, the United States and other countries/regions. Compared with the previous phase of MICS-Asia (MICS-Asia II), the evaluation with observations was extended from 4 months to 1 full year across China and the western Pacific Rim. In general, model performance levels for O3 varied widely by region and season. Most models captured the key patterns of monthly and diurnal variation of surface O3 and its precursors in the North China Plain and western Pacific Rim but failed to do so for the Pearl River Delta. A significant overestimation of surface O3 was evident from May to September/October and from January to May over the North China Plain, the western Pacific Rim and the Pearl River Delta. Comparisons drawn from observations show that the considerable diversity in O3 photochemical production partly contributed to this overestimation and to high levels of inter-model variability in O3 for North China. In terms of O3 soundings, the ensemble average of models reproduced the vertical structure for the western Pacific, but overestimated O3 levels to below 800&thinsp;hPa in the summer. In the industrialized Pearl River Delta, the ensemble average presented an overestimation for the lower troposphere and an underestimation for the middle troposphere. The ensemble average of 13 models for O3 did not always exhibit superior performance compared with certain individual models in contrast with its superior value for Europe. This finding suggests that the spread of ensemble-model values does not represent all of the uncertainties of O3 or that most MICS-Asia III models missed key processes. This study improved the performance of modeling O3 in March at Japanese sites compared with MICS-Asia II. However, it overpredicted surface O3 concentrations for western Japan in July, which was not found by MICS-Asia II. Major challenges still remain with regard to identifying the sources of bias in surface O3 over East Asia in CTMs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072026540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072026540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/acp-19-12993-2019

DO - 10.5194/acp-19-12993-2019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072026540

VL - 19

SP - 12993

EP - 13015

JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

SN - 1680-7316

IS - 20

ER -