Models of venus atmosphere

Sebastien Lebonnois, Christopher Lee, Masaru Yamamoto, Jonathan Dawson, Stephen R. Lewis, Joao Mendonca, Peter Read, Helen F. Parish, Gerald Schubert, Lennart Bengtsson, David Grinspoon, Sanjay S. Limaye, Hauke Schmidt, Håkan Svedhem, Dimitri V. Titov

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of an International Space Science Institute (ISSI) working group, we have conducted a project to compare the most recent General Circulation Models (GCMs) of the Venus atmospheric circulation. A common configuration has been decided, with simple physical parametrization for the solar forcing and the boundary layer scheme. Six models have been used in this intercomparison project. The nominal simulation was run for more than 200 Venus days, and additional sensitivity runs have been done by several models to test the trends visible in these models when parameters are varied: topography, upper and lower boundary conditions, horizontal and vertical resolution, initial conditions. The results show that even in very similar modeling conditions, the wind speeds obtained with the different GCMs are widely different. Super-rotation is obtained, but the shape (with or without marked high-latitude jets) and amplitude of the maximum zonal wind jet is different from one model to the other, from 15 to 50m/s. Minor sensitivity is seen in several models to the upper boundary conditions, the topography or the vertical grid. Horizontal resolution and lower boundary conditions induce variations that are significant, affecting the amplitude and shape of the region of maximum zonal wind. Two models were started from an atmosphere already in super-rotation. The simulations did not converge back to the nominal simulations, maintaining maximum zonal winds over 70m/s (and even 100 m/s) without marked high-latitude jets. This study shows how sensitive GCMs are to the weak forcing of Venus atmosphere, and how difficult it is to draw precise conclusions on the circulation obtained with a single model, as well as on its sensitivity to some parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTowards Understanding the Climate of Venus
Subtitle of host publicationApplications of Terrestrial Models to Our Sister Planet
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages129-156
Number of pages28
Volume11
ISBN (Electronic)9781461450641
ISBN (Print)9781461450634
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Venus atmosphere
superrotation
Venus (planet)
boundary conditions
polar regions
sensitivity
topography
atmospheric circulation
simulation
aerospace sciences
boundary layers
grids

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Lebonnois, S., Lee, C., Yamamoto, M., Dawson, J., Lewis, S. R., Mendonca, J., ... Titov, D. V. (2013). Models of venus atmosphere. In Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus: Applications of Terrestrial Models to Our Sister Planet (Vol. 11, pp. 129-156). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5064-1_8

Models of venus atmosphere. / Lebonnois, Sebastien; Lee, Christopher; Yamamoto, Masaru; Dawson, Jonathan; Lewis, Stephen R.; Mendonca, Joao; Read, Peter; Parish, Helen F.; Schubert, Gerald; Bengtsson, Lennart; Grinspoon, David; Limaye, Sanjay S.; Schmidt, Hauke; Svedhem, Håkan; Titov, Dimitri V.

Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus: Applications of Terrestrial Models to Our Sister Planet. Vol. 11 Springer New York, 2013. p. 129-156.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lebonnois, S, Lee, C, Yamamoto, M, Dawson, J, Lewis, SR, Mendonca, J, Read, P, Parish, HF, Schubert, G, Bengtsson, L, Grinspoon, D, Limaye, SS, Schmidt, H, Svedhem, H & Titov, DV 2013, Models of venus atmosphere. in Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus: Applications of Terrestrial Models to Our Sister Planet. vol. 11, Springer New York, pp. 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5064-1_8
Lebonnois S, Lee C, Yamamoto M, Dawson J, Lewis SR, Mendonca J et al. Models of venus atmosphere. In Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus: Applications of Terrestrial Models to Our Sister Planet. Vol. 11. Springer New York. 2013. p. 129-156 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5064-1_8
Lebonnois, Sebastien ; Lee, Christopher ; Yamamoto, Masaru ; Dawson, Jonathan ; Lewis, Stephen R. ; Mendonca, Joao ; Read, Peter ; Parish, Helen F. ; Schubert, Gerald ; Bengtsson, Lennart ; Grinspoon, David ; Limaye, Sanjay S. ; Schmidt, Hauke ; Svedhem, Håkan ; Titov, Dimitri V. / Models of venus atmosphere. Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus: Applications of Terrestrial Models to Our Sister Planet. Vol. 11 Springer New York, 2013. pp. 129-156
@inbook{1eef2deb714a4f64803a7646ee09e00f,
title = "Models of venus atmosphere",
abstract = "In the context of an International Space Science Institute (ISSI) working group, we have conducted a project to compare the most recent General Circulation Models (GCMs) of the Venus atmospheric circulation. A common configuration has been decided, with simple physical parametrization for the solar forcing and the boundary layer scheme. Six models have been used in this intercomparison project. The nominal simulation was run for more than 200 Venus days, and additional sensitivity runs have been done by several models to test the trends visible in these models when parameters are varied: topography, upper and lower boundary conditions, horizontal and vertical resolution, initial conditions. The results show that even in very similar modeling conditions, the wind speeds obtained with the different GCMs are widely different. Super-rotation is obtained, but the shape (with or without marked high-latitude jets) and amplitude of the maximum zonal wind jet is different from one model to the other, from 15 to 50m/s. Minor sensitivity is seen in several models to the upper boundary conditions, the topography or the vertical grid. Horizontal resolution and lower boundary conditions induce variations that are significant, affecting the amplitude and shape of the region of maximum zonal wind. Two models were started from an atmosphere already in super-rotation. The simulations did not converge back to the nominal simulations, maintaining maximum zonal winds over 70m/s (and even 100 m/s) without marked high-latitude jets. This study shows how sensitive GCMs are to the weak forcing of Venus atmosphere, and how difficult it is to draw precise conclusions on the circulation obtained with a single model, as well as on its sensitivity to some parameters.",
author = "Sebastien Lebonnois and Christopher Lee and Masaru Yamamoto and Jonathan Dawson and Lewis, {Stephen R.} and Joao Mendonca and Peter Read and Parish, {Helen F.} and Gerald Schubert and Lennart Bengtsson and David Grinspoon and Limaye, {Sanjay S.} and Hauke Schmidt and H{\aa}kan Svedhem and Titov, {Dimitri V.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4614-5064-1_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781461450634",
volume = "11",
pages = "129--156",
booktitle = "Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus",
publisher = "Springer New York",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Models of venus atmosphere

AU - Lebonnois, Sebastien

AU - Lee, Christopher

AU - Yamamoto, Masaru

AU - Dawson, Jonathan

AU - Lewis, Stephen R.

AU - Mendonca, Joao

AU - Read, Peter

AU - Parish, Helen F.

AU - Schubert, Gerald

AU - Bengtsson, Lennart

AU - Grinspoon, David

AU - Limaye, Sanjay S.

AU - Schmidt, Hauke

AU - Svedhem, Håkan

AU - Titov, Dimitri V.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - In the context of an International Space Science Institute (ISSI) working group, we have conducted a project to compare the most recent General Circulation Models (GCMs) of the Venus atmospheric circulation. A common configuration has been decided, with simple physical parametrization for the solar forcing and the boundary layer scheme. Six models have been used in this intercomparison project. The nominal simulation was run for more than 200 Venus days, and additional sensitivity runs have been done by several models to test the trends visible in these models when parameters are varied: topography, upper and lower boundary conditions, horizontal and vertical resolution, initial conditions. The results show that even in very similar modeling conditions, the wind speeds obtained with the different GCMs are widely different. Super-rotation is obtained, but the shape (with or without marked high-latitude jets) and amplitude of the maximum zonal wind jet is different from one model to the other, from 15 to 50m/s. Minor sensitivity is seen in several models to the upper boundary conditions, the topography or the vertical grid. Horizontal resolution and lower boundary conditions induce variations that are significant, affecting the amplitude and shape of the region of maximum zonal wind. Two models were started from an atmosphere already in super-rotation. The simulations did not converge back to the nominal simulations, maintaining maximum zonal winds over 70m/s (and even 100 m/s) without marked high-latitude jets. This study shows how sensitive GCMs are to the weak forcing of Venus atmosphere, and how difficult it is to draw precise conclusions on the circulation obtained with a single model, as well as on its sensitivity to some parameters.

AB - In the context of an International Space Science Institute (ISSI) working group, we have conducted a project to compare the most recent General Circulation Models (GCMs) of the Venus atmospheric circulation. A common configuration has been decided, with simple physical parametrization for the solar forcing and the boundary layer scheme. Six models have been used in this intercomparison project. The nominal simulation was run for more than 200 Venus days, and additional sensitivity runs have been done by several models to test the trends visible in these models when parameters are varied: topography, upper and lower boundary conditions, horizontal and vertical resolution, initial conditions. The results show that even in very similar modeling conditions, the wind speeds obtained with the different GCMs are widely different. Super-rotation is obtained, but the shape (with or without marked high-latitude jets) and amplitude of the maximum zonal wind jet is different from one model to the other, from 15 to 50m/s. Minor sensitivity is seen in several models to the upper boundary conditions, the topography or the vertical grid. Horizontal resolution and lower boundary conditions induce variations that are significant, affecting the amplitude and shape of the region of maximum zonal wind. Two models were started from an atmosphere already in super-rotation. The simulations did not converge back to the nominal simulations, maintaining maximum zonal winds over 70m/s (and even 100 m/s) without marked high-latitude jets. This study shows how sensitive GCMs are to the weak forcing of Venus atmosphere, and how difficult it is to draw precise conclusions on the circulation obtained with a single model, as well as on its sensitivity to some parameters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987911081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987911081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-5064-1_8

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-5064-1_8

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84987911081

SN - 9781461450634

VL - 11

SP - 129

EP - 156

BT - Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus

PB - Springer New York

ER -