Monitoring of thermal activity at the Hatchobaru-Otake geothermal area in Japan using multi-source satellite images-with comparisons of methods, and solar and seasonal effects

Md Bodruddoza Mia, Yasuhiro Fujimitsu, Jun Nishijima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Hatchobaru-Otake (HO) geothermal field is proximal to the Kuju volcano on Kyushu, Japan. There are currently three geothermal power plants operating within this geothermal field. Herein, we explore the thermal status of the HO geothermal area using ASTER thermal infrared data to monitor heat losses from 2009 to 2017. We assessed the solar effects and seasonal variation on heat losses based on day- and night-time Landsat thermal infrared images, and compared three conventional methods of land surface temperature (LST) measurements. The normalized difference vegetation index threshold method of emissivity, the split window algorithm for LST, and the Stefan-Boltzmann equation for radiative heat flux (RHF) were used to determine the heat loss within the study area. The radiative heat loss (RHL) was 0.36 MW, 38.61 MW, and 29.14 MW in 2009, 2013, and 2017, respectively, from the HO geothermal field. The highest anomaly in RHF was recorded in 2013, while the lowest was in 2009. The RHLs were higher from Otake than from the Hatchobaru thermal area in the year of 2013 (~31%) and 2017 (~78%). The seasonal variation in the RHLs based on all three LST estimation methods had a similar pattern, with the highest RHL (about 383-451 MW) in spring and the lowest (about 10-222 MW) in autumn for the daytime images from the HO geothermal field. In the nighttime images, the highest RHL was about 35-67 MW in autumn and the lowest was about 1-3 MW in spring, based on the three LST methods for RHFs. The highest RHL was about 35-42 MW in spring (day) and 3-7 MW in autumn (night) from the Hatchobaru thermal area, analyzed separately. Similarly, the highest RHL was about 22-25 MW in spring (day) and 4-5 MW in winter (night) from the Otake thermal area. The seasonal variation was greatly influenced by the regional ambient temperature. We also observed that clouds had a huge effect, with the highest values for both LST and RHF recorded below clouds on an autumn day. Overall, we obtained higher LSTs at nighttime and lower LSTs during the day from the improved mono-window algorithm than the split window algorithms for all of the seasons. The heat losses were also higher for the improved mono-window algorithm than the split window algorithms, based on the LST nighttime thermal infrared data. Considering the error level of the LST methods and Landsat 8 band 11, this study recommends the IWM method for LST using the Landsat 8 band 10 data. This study also suggests that both the nighttime ASTER and Landsat 8 thermal infrared data could be effective for monitoring the thermal status of the HO geothermal area, given that data is available for the entire period.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1430
JournalRemote Sensing
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

land surface
surface temperature
monitoring
split window
Landsat
autumn
heat flux
seasonal variation
ASTER
effect
loss
comparison
satellite image
method
geothermal power
estimation method
emissivity
NDVI
power plant
volcano

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{f4552c139c2b45d29e438f81b7346df5,
title = "Monitoring of thermal activity at the Hatchobaru-Otake geothermal area in Japan using multi-source satellite images-with comparisons of methods, and solar and seasonal effects",
abstract = "The Hatchobaru-Otake (HO) geothermal field is proximal to the Kuju volcano on Kyushu, Japan. There are currently three geothermal power plants operating within this geothermal field. Herein, we explore the thermal status of the HO geothermal area using ASTER thermal infrared data to monitor heat losses from 2009 to 2017. We assessed the solar effects and seasonal variation on heat losses based on day- and night-time Landsat thermal infrared images, and compared three conventional methods of land surface temperature (LST) measurements. The normalized difference vegetation index threshold method of emissivity, the split window algorithm for LST, and the Stefan-Boltzmann equation for radiative heat flux (RHF) were used to determine the heat loss within the study area. The radiative heat loss (RHL) was 0.36 MW, 38.61 MW, and 29.14 MW in 2009, 2013, and 2017, respectively, from the HO geothermal field. The highest anomaly in RHF was recorded in 2013, while the lowest was in 2009. The RHLs were higher from Otake than from the Hatchobaru thermal area in the year of 2013 (~31{\%}) and 2017 (~78{\%}). The seasonal variation in the RHLs based on all three LST estimation methods had a similar pattern, with the highest RHL (about 383-451 MW) in spring and the lowest (about 10-222 MW) in autumn for the daytime images from the HO geothermal field. In the nighttime images, the highest RHL was about 35-67 MW in autumn and the lowest was about 1-3 MW in spring, based on the three LST methods for RHFs. The highest RHL was about 35-42 MW in spring (day) and 3-7 MW in autumn (night) from the Hatchobaru thermal area, analyzed separately. Similarly, the highest RHL was about 22-25 MW in spring (day) and 4-5 MW in winter (night) from the Otake thermal area. The seasonal variation was greatly influenced by the regional ambient temperature. We also observed that clouds had a huge effect, with the highest values for both LST and RHF recorded below clouds on an autumn day. Overall, we obtained higher LSTs at nighttime and lower LSTs during the day from the improved mono-window algorithm than the split window algorithms for all of the seasons. The heat losses were also higher for the improved mono-window algorithm than the split window algorithms, based on the LST nighttime thermal infrared data. Considering the error level of the LST methods and Landsat 8 band 11, this study recommends the IWM method for LST using the Landsat 8 band 10 data. This study also suggests that both the nighttime ASTER and Landsat 8 thermal infrared data could be effective for monitoring the thermal status of the HO geothermal area, given that data is available for the entire period.",
author = "Mia, {Md Bodruddoza} and Yasuhiro Fujimitsu and Jun Nishijima",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/rs10091430",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Remote Sensing",
issn = "2072-4292",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring of thermal activity at the Hatchobaru-Otake geothermal area in Japan using multi-source satellite images-with comparisons of methods, and solar and seasonal effects

AU - Mia, Md Bodruddoza

AU - Fujimitsu, Yasuhiro

AU - Nishijima, Jun

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - The Hatchobaru-Otake (HO) geothermal field is proximal to the Kuju volcano on Kyushu, Japan. There are currently three geothermal power plants operating within this geothermal field. Herein, we explore the thermal status of the HO geothermal area using ASTER thermal infrared data to monitor heat losses from 2009 to 2017. We assessed the solar effects and seasonal variation on heat losses based on day- and night-time Landsat thermal infrared images, and compared three conventional methods of land surface temperature (LST) measurements. The normalized difference vegetation index threshold method of emissivity, the split window algorithm for LST, and the Stefan-Boltzmann equation for radiative heat flux (RHF) were used to determine the heat loss within the study area. The radiative heat loss (RHL) was 0.36 MW, 38.61 MW, and 29.14 MW in 2009, 2013, and 2017, respectively, from the HO geothermal field. The highest anomaly in RHF was recorded in 2013, while the lowest was in 2009. The RHLs were higher from Otake than from the Hatchobaru thermal area in the year of 2013 (~31%) and 2017 (~78%). The seasonal variation in the RHLs based on all three LST estimation methods had a similar pattern, with the highest RHL (about 383-451 MW) in spring and the lowest (about 10-222 MW) in autumn for the daytime images from the HO geothermal field. In the nighttime images, the highest RHL was about 35-67 MW in autumn and the lowest was about 1-3 MW in spring, based on the three LST methods for RHFs. The highest RHL was about 35-42 MW in spring (day) and 3-7 MW in autumn (night) from the Hatchobaru thermal area, analyzed separately. Similarly, the highest RHL was about 22-25 MW in spring (day) and 4-5 MW in winter (night) from the Otake thermal area. The seasonal variation was greatly influenced by the regional ambient temperature. We also observed that clouds had a huge effect, with the highest values for both LST and RHF recorded below clouds on an autumn day. Overall, we obtained higher LSTs at nighttime and lower LSTs during the day from the improved mono-window algorithm than the split window algorithms for all of the seasons. The heat losses were also higher for the improved mono-window algorithm than the split window algorithms, based on the LST nighttime thermal infrared data. Considering the error level of the LST methods and Landsat 8 band 11, this study recommends the IWM method for LST using the Landsat 8 band 10 data. This study also suggests that both the nighttime ASTER and Landsat 8 thermal infrared data could be effective for monitoring the thermal status of the HO geothermal area, given that data is available for the entire period.

AB - The Hatchobaru-Otake (HO) geothermal field is proximal to the Kuju volcano on Kyushu, Japan. There are currently three geothermal power plants operating within this geothermal field. Herein, we explore the thermal status of the HO geothermal area using ASTER thermal infrared data to monitor heat losses from 2009 to 2017. We assessed the solar effects and seasonal variation on heat losses based on day- and night-time Landsat thermal infrared images, and compared three conventional methods of land surface temperature (LST) measurements. The normalized difference vegetation index threshold method of emissivity, the split window algorithm for LST, and the Stefan-Boltzmann equation for radiative heat flux (RHF) were used to determine the heat loss within the study area. The radiative heat loss (RHL) was 0.36 MW, 38.61 MW, and 29.14 MW in 2009, 2013, and 2017, respectively, from the HO geothermal field. The highest anomaly in RHF was recorded in 2013, while the lowest was in 2009. The RHLs were higher from Otake than from the Hatchobaru thermal area in the year of 2013 (~31%) and 2017 (~78%). The seasonal variation in the RHLs based on all three LST estimation methods had a similar pattern, with the highest RHL (about 383-451 MW) in spring and the lowest (about 10-222 MW) in autumn for the daytime images from the HO geothermal field. In the nighttime images, the highest RHL was about 35-67 MW in autumn and the lowest was about 1-3 MW in spring, based on the three LST methods for RHFs. The highest RHL was about 35-42 MW in spring (day) and 3-7 MW in autumn (night) from the Hatchobaru thermal area, analyzed separately. Similarly, the highest RHL was about 22-25 MW in spring (day) and 4-5 MW in winter (night) from the Otake thermal area. The seasonal variation was greatly influenced by the regional ambient temperature. We also observed that clouds had a huge effect, with the highest values for both LST and RHF recorded below clouds on an autumn day. Overall, we obtained higher LSTs at nighttime and lower LSTs during the day from the improved mono-window algorithm than the split window algorithms for all of the seasons. The heat losses were also higher for the improved mono-window algorithm than the split window algorithms, based on the LST nighttime thermal infrared data. Considering the error level of the LST methods and Landsat 8 band 11, this study recommends the IWM method for LST using the Landsat 8 band 10 data. This study also suggests that both the nighttime ASTER and Landsat 8 thermal infrared data could be effective for monitoring the thermal status of the HO geothermal area, given that data is available for the entire period.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053631553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053631553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/rs10091430

DO - 10.3390/rs10091430

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053631553

VL - 10

JO - Remote Sensing

JF - Remote Sensing

SN - 2072-4292

IS - 9

M1 - 1430

ER -