Narrow-margin excision for invasive acral melanoma: Is it acceptable?

Takamichi Ito, Yumiko Kaku-Ito, Maiko Wada-Ohno, Masutaka Furue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


In this retrospective review of 100 patients with primary invasive acral melanoma, we examined whether narrow-margin excision is warranted for acral melanoma. Patients treated with surgical margins recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (R-group) were compared to those treated with narrow margins (N-group). A total of 65 patients underwent narrow-margin excision. Positive margin status or local recurrence rarely occurred regardless of the excision margins, whereas fatal events frequently occurred, particularly among the patients with T4 melanoma. The mortality rates of N-and R-group with T1–3 melanomas were similar (1.36 and 1.28 per 100 person-years, respectively). However, patients with T4 melanoma treated with narrow-margin excision had a higher mortality rate (11.44 vs. 5.03 per 100 person-years). Kaplan–Meier analyses showed a worse prognosis in the N-group (p = 0.045) but this group had thicker Breslow thickness (4.21 mm vs. 2.03 mm, p = 0.0013). A multivariate analysis showed that Breslow thickness was an independent risk factor, but surgical margin was not a risk factor for melanoma-specific survival or disease-free survival. In conclusion, although we could not find a difference between the narrow-margin excision and recommended-margin excision in this study, we suggest following current recommendations of guidelines. Our study warrants the prospective collection of data on acral melanoma to better define the prognosis of this infrequent type of melanoma.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2266
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Narrow-margin excision for invasive acral melanoma: Is it acceptable?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this