Negative potential auditory brainstem response with 3-msec latency in profoundly deaf patients: characteristics and relationship to vestibular evoked response

K. Shiraishi, Y. Eura, T. Kato, K. Shibata, T. Sakata, T. Soda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A large negative deflection with a latency of 3 msec was observed in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms of 48 patients (6.5%), [59 ears (5.8%)] in 740 patients with profound peripheral deafness (1,009 ears) between 1978 and 1990 at our department. This negative deflection was termed the "N3 potential." We reviewed some of these patients and discuss some common characteristics found in abnormal ABR waveforms. We also inquired into the conditions and origins of these potentials. Although virtually all patients were less than 10 years of age, the N3 potential was also observed in the ABR waveform of adult patients. There were no sex differences. In the majority of patients audiograms showed no response to the maximum output of an andiometer in the high frequency range and a residual response in the low frequency range. The most common cause of deafness was "unknown" in children, and "sudden deafness" in adults. The N3 potentials were noted at intensities of 80 dBnHL or greater. A high repetition rate (83.3/sec) of the click stimulus influenced the latency and amplitude of the N3 potential. As the stimulus intensity increased, the amplitude of the potential increased, and the latency decreased. The potential was replicated on retesting within less than a month. The N3 potential had a consistent latency and amplitude over the scalp. We conclude that the N3 potential was a physiological "neural" response evoked by a loud sound rather than by an electrical artifact. The N3 potential was most likely not an auditory evoked response or a response from a semicircular canal, because of the 3-msec latency and sharpness of the waveform, with lack of vertigo. The results suggest that the N3 potential may be a saccular acoustic response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1382-1393
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Otolaryngology of Japan
Volume100
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Deafness
Ear
Sudden Hearing Loss
Semicircular Canals
Auditory Evoked Potentials
Vertigo
Scalp
Acoustics
Sex Characteristics
Artifacts

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Negative potential auditory brainstem response with 3-msec latency in profoundly deaf patients : characteristics and relationship to vestibular evoked response. / Shiraishi, K.; Eura, Y.; Kato, T.; Shibata, K.; Sakata, T.; Soda, T.

In: Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan, Vol. 100, No. 11, 11.1997, p. 1382-1393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{acf4640aa2c64ec2b2d5fd7966715bc8,
title = "Negative potential auditory brainstem response with 3-msec latency in profoundly deaf patients: characteristics and relationship to vestibular evoked response",
abstract = "A large negative deflection with a latency of 3 msec was observed in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms of 48 patients (6.5{\%}), [59 ears (5.8{\%})] in 740 patients with profound peripheral deafness (1,009 ears) between 1978 and 1990 at our department. This negative deflection was termed the {"}N3 potential.{"} We reviewed some of these patients and discuss some common characteristics found in abnormal ABR waveforms. We also inquired into the conditions and origins of these potentials. Although virtually all patients were less than 10 years of age, the N3 potential was also observed in the ABR waveform of adult patients. There were no sex differences. In the majority of patients audiograms showed no response to the maximum output of an andiometer in the high frequency range and a residual response in the low frequency range. The most common cause of deafness was {"}unknown{"} in children, and {"}sudden deafness{"} in adults. The N3 potentials were noted at intensities of 80 dBnHL or greater. A high repetition rate (83.3/sec) of the click stimulus influenced the latency and amplitude of the N3 potential. As the stimulus intensity increased, the amplitude of the potential increased, and the latency decreased. The potential was replicated on retesting within less than a month. The N3 potential had a consistent latency and amplitude over the scalp. We conclude that the N3 potential was a physiological {"}neural{"} response evoked by a loud sound rather than by an electrical artifact. The N3 potential was most likely not an auditory evoked response or a response from a semicircular canal, because of the 3-msec latency and sharpness of the waveform, with lack of vertigo. The results suggest that the N3 potential may be a saccular acoustic response.",
author = "K. Shiraishi and Y. Eura and T. Kato and K. Shibata and T. Sakata and T. Soda",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "1382--1393",
journal = "Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan",
issn = "0030-6622",
publisher = "Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative potential auditory brainstem response with 3-msec latency in profoundly deaf patients

T2 - characteristics and relationship to vestibular evoked response

AU - Shiraishi, K.

AU - Eura, Y.

AU - Kato, T.

AU - Shibata, K.

AU - Sakata, T.

AU - Soda, T.

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - A large negative deflection with a latency of 3 msec was observed in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms of 48 patients (6.5%), [59 ears (5.8%)] in 740 patients with profound peripheral deafness (1,009 ears) between 1978 and 1990 at our department. This negative deflection was termed the "N3 potential." We reviewed some of these patients and discuss some common characteristics found in abnormal ABR waveforms. We also inquired into the conditions and origins of these potentials. Although virtually all patients were less than 10 years of age, the N3 potential was also observed in the ABR waveform of adult patients. There were no sex differences. In the majority of patients audiograms showed no response to the maximum output of an andiometer in the high frequency range and a residual response in the low frequency range. The most common cause of deafness was "unknown" in children, and "sudden deafness" in adults. The N3 potentials were noted at intensities of 80 dBnHL or greater. A high repetition rate (83.3/sec) of the click stimulus influenced the latency and amplitude of the N3 potential. As the stimulus intensity increased, the amplitude of the potential increased, and the latency decreased. The potential was replicated on retesting within less than a month. The N3 potential had a consistent latency and amplitude over the scalp. We conclude that the N3 potential was a physiological "neural" response evoked by a loud sound rather than by an electrical artifact. The N3 potential was most likely not an auditory evoked response or a response from a semicircular canal, because of the 3-msec latency and sharpness of the waveform, with lack of vertigo. The results suggest that the N3 potential may be a saccular acoustic response.

AB - A large negative deflection with a latency of 3 msec was observed in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms of 48 patients (6.5%), [59 ears (5.8%)] in 740 patients with profound peripheral deafness (1,009 ears) between 1978 and 1990 at our department. This negative deflection was termed the "N3 potential." We reviewed some of these patients and discuss some common characteristics found in abnormal ABR waveforms. We also inquired into the conditions and origins of these potentials. Although virtually all patients were less than 10 years of age, the N3 potential was also observed in the ABR waveform of adult patients. There were no sex differences. In the majority of patients audiograms showed no response to the maximum output of an andiometer in the high frequency range and a residual response in the low frequency range. The most common cause of deafness was "unknown" in children, and "sudden deafness" in adults. The N3 potentials were noted at intensities of 80 dBnHL or greater. A high repetition rate (83.3/sec) of the click stimulus influenced the latency and amplitude of the N3 potential. As the stimulus intensity increased, the amplitude of the potential increased, and the latency decreased. The potential was replicated on retesting within less than a month. The N3 potential had a consistent latency and amplitude over the scalp. We conclude that the N3 potential was a physiological "neural" response evoked by a loud sound rather than by an electrical artifact. The N3 potential was most likely not an auditory evoked response or a response from a semicircular canal, because of the 3-msec latency and sharpness of the waveform, with lack of vertigo. The results suggest that the N3 potential may be a saccular acoustic response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031263719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031263719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9423322

VL - 100

SP - 1382

EP - 1393

JO - Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan

JF - Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan

SN - 0030-6622

IS - 11

ER -