Non-separability and substitutability among water pollutants: Evidence from India

Surender Kumar, Shunsuke Managi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The design and implementation of environmental policy often involve more than one pollutant, and must consider pollution as a byproduct of the production of marketable output. In this paper, we test the implicit assumption in the empirical literature that (1) production of marketable output, pollution and abatement are separable, and (2) different pollutants can be abated separately. Using unique plant-level data in India, we reject the null hypotheses of separability between marketable output and pollutants, and between different pollutants. Firms must incur abatement costs for reducing pollution levels. In addition, complement and substitute relationships between water pollutants are demonstrated with statistical significance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)709-733
Number of pages25
JournalEnvironment and Development Economics
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

pollutant
India
water
pollution
evidence
abatement cost
environmental policy
statistical significance
water pollutant
Nonseparability
Water
Substitutability
Pollution
firm
costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Non-separability and substitutability among water pollutants : Evidence from India. / Kumar, Surender; Managi, Shunsuke.

In: Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 16, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 709-733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f83db3c87a74768b849a300b9bb04ad,
title = "Non-separability and substitutability among water pollutants: Evidence from India",
abstract = "The design and implementation of environmental policy often involve more than one pollutant, and must consider pollution as a byproduct of the production of marketable output. In this paper, we test the implicit assumption in the empirical literature that (1) production of marketable output, pollution and abatement are separable, and (2) different pollutants can be abated separately. Using unique plant-level data in India, we reject the null hypotheses of separability between marketable output and pollutants, and between different pollutants. Firms must incur abatement costs for reducing pollution levels. In addition, complement and substitute relationships between water pollutants are demonstrated with statistical significance.",
author = "Surender Kumar and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1355770X11000283",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "709--733",
journal = "Environment and Development Economics",
issn = "1355-770X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-separability and substitutability among water pollutants

T2 - Evidence from India

AU - Kumar, Surender

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - The design and implementation of environmental policy often involve more than one pollutant, and must consider pollution as a byproduct of the production of marketable output. In this paper, we test the implicit assumption in the empirical literature that (1) production of marketable output, pollution and abatement are separable, and (2) different pollutants can be abated separately. Using unique plant-level data in India, we reject the null hypotheses of separability between marketable output and pollutants, and between different pollutants. Firms must incur abatement costs for reducing pollution levels. In addition, complement and substitute relationships between water pollutants are demonstrated with statistical significance.

AB - The design and implementation of environmental policy often involve more than one pollutant, and must consider pollution as a byproduct of the production of marketable output. In this paper, we test the implicit assumption in the empirical literature that (1) production of marketable output, pollution and abatement are separable, and (2) different pollutants can be abated separately. Using unique plant-level data in India, we reject the null hypotheses of separability between marketable output and pollutants, and between different pollutants. Firms must incur abatement costs for reducing pollution levels. In addition, complement and substitute relationships between water pollutants are demonstrated with statistical significance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155172784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84155172784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1355770X11000283

DO - 10.1017/S1355770X11000283

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84155172784

VL - 16

SP - 709

EP - 733

JO - Environment and Development Economics

JF - Environment and Development Economics

SN - 1355-770X

IS - 6

ER -