On Trace Movement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper concerns the accessibility of trace to the operation Attract/Move proposed in Chomsky (1995). Arguing against Chomsky's (1995) suggestion that traces of A′ -movement can undergo further attraction unlike those of A-movement, the present study claims that the operation Attract/Move makes no distinction between traces left by A- and A′ -movement. Using data which resist the trace movement analysis, an alternative analysis of Case checking without trace movement is argued for. The present study also shows that some reconstruction phenomena require trace movement, and finally presents a new proposal for the correct generalization, incorporating a structurally defined feature distinction (major/non-major), in which the trace distinction plays no role.∗.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-202
Number of pages21
JournalEnglish Linguistics
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reconstruction
Noam Chomsky
Accessibility
Attraction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

On Trace Movement. / Nishioka, Nobuaki.

In: English Linguistics, Vol. 14, 01.01.1997, p. 182-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nishioka, Nobuaki. / On Trace Movement. In: English Linguistics. 1997 ; Vol. 14. pp. 182-202.
@article{d0bc7d58450642bdafc081c4c50053b9,
title = "On Trace Movement",
abstract = "This paper concerns the accessibility of trace to the operation Attract/Move proposed in Chomsky (1995). Arguing against Chomsky's (1995) suggestion that traces of A′ -movement can undergo further attraction unlike those of A-movement, the present study claims that the operation Attract/Move makes no distinction between traces left by A- and A′ -movement. Using data which resist the trace movement analysis, an alternative analysis of Case checking without trace movement is argued for. The present study also shows that some reconstruction phenomena require trace movement, and finally presents a new proposal for the correct generalization, incorporating a structurally defined feature distinction (major/non-major), in which the trace distinction plays no role.∗.",
author = "Nobuaki Nishioka",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.9793/elsj1984.14.182",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "182--202",
journal = "English Linguistics / Journal of the English Linguistic Society of Japan",
issn = "0918-3701",
publisher = "The English Linguistic Society of Japan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On Trace Movement

AU - Nishioka, Nobuaki

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - This paper concerns the accessibility of trace to the operation Attract/Move proposed in Chomsky (1995). Arguing against Chomsky's (1995) suggestion that traces of A′ -movement can undergo further attraction unlike those of A-movement, the present study claims that the operation Attract/Move makes no distinction between traces left by A- and A′ -movement. Using data which resist the trace movement analysis, an alternative analysis of Case checking without trace movement is argued for. The present study also shows that some reconstruction phenomena require trace movement, and finally presents a new proposal for the correct generalization, incorporating a structurally defined feature distinction (major/non-major), in which the trace distinction plays no role.∗.

AB - This paper concerns the accessibility of trace to the operation Attract/Move proposed in Chomsky (1995). Arguing against Chomsky's (1995) suggestion that traces of A′ -movement can undergo further attraction unlike those of A-movement, the present study claims that the operation Attract/Move makes no distinction between traces left by A- and A′ -movement. Using data which resist the trace movement analysis, an alternative analysis of Case checking without trace movement is argued for. The present study also shows that some reconstruction phenomena require trace movement, and finally presents a new proposal for the correct generalization, incorporating a structurally defined feature distinction (major/non-major), in which the trace distinction plays no role.∗.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916972668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916972668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.9793/elsj1984.14.182

DO - 10.9793/elsj1984.14.182

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84916972668

VL - 14

SP - 182

EP - 202

JO - English Linguistics / Journal of the English Linguistic Society of Japan

JF - English Linguistics / Journal of the English Linguistic Society of Japan

SN - 0918-3701

ER -