One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair

Timothy S. Johnson, David C. Johnson, Michael K. Shindle, Answorth A. Allen, Andrew J. Weiland, John Cavanaugh, Dennis Noonan, Stephen Lyman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are several techniques that have been described for distal biceps tendon repair but there is still controversy regarding the optimal technique. Our hypothesis is that the single-incision technique will have a similar complication rate and functionally equivalent restoration of function compared with the two-incision approach. A retrospective review of consecutive biceps tendon repairs was performed at one institution over a 5-year period. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria and 26 were available for follow-up including subjective assessment, physical examination, and strength testing. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach utilized: 12 patients underwent single-incision repair and 14 had a two-incision repair. The average follow-up was 33 months (minimum 13; maximum 75). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to flexion strength or endurance, supination strength or endurance, or complication rates between the two techniques. In conclusion, both surgical techniques led to adequate restoration of strength with a low complication rate. Both techniques are safe to perform and should be guided by surgeon comfort with the approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-122
Number of pages6
JournalHSS Journal
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this