One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair

Timothy S. Johnson, David C. Johnson, Michael K. Shindle, Answorth A. Allen, Andrew J. Weiland, John Cavanaugh, Dennis Noonan, Stephen Lyman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are several techniques that have been described for distal biceps tendon repair but there is still controversy regarding the optimal technique. Our hypothesis is that the single-incision technique will have a similar complication rate and functionally equivalent restoration of function compared with the two-incision approach. A retrospective review of consecutive biceps tendon repairs was performed at one institution over a 5-year period. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria and 26 were available for follow-up including subjective assessment, physical examination, and strength testing. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach utilized: 12 patients underwent single-incision repair and 14 had a two-incision repair. The average follow-up was 33 months (minimum 13; maximum 75). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to flexion strength or endurance, supination strength or endurance, or complication rates between the two techniques. In conclusion, both surgical techniques led to adequate restoration of strength with a low complication rate. Both techniques are safe to perform and should be guided by surgeon comfort with the approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-122
Number of pages6
JournalHSS Journal
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2008

Fingerprint

Tendons
Supination
Physical Examination
Surgeons

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Johnson, T. S., Johnson, D. C., Shindle, M. K., Allen, A. A., Weiland, A. J., Cavanaugh, J., ... Lyman, S. (2008). One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair. HSS Journal, 4(2), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-008-9085-4

One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair. / Johnson, Timothy S.; Johnson, David C.; Shindle, Michael K.; Allen, Answorth A.; Weiland, Andrew J.; Cavanaugh, John; Noonan, Dennis; Lyman, Stephen.

In: HSS Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.09.2008, p. 117-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, TS, Johnson, DC, Shindle, MK, Allen, AA, Weiland, AJ, Cavanaugh, J, Noonan, D & Lyman, S 2008, 'One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair', HSS Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-008-9085-4
Johnson TS, Johnson DC, Shindle MK, Allen AA, Weiland AJ, Cavanaugh J et al. One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair. HSS Journal. 2008 Sep 1;4(2):117-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-008-9085-4
Johnson, Timothy S. ; Johnson, David C. ; Shindle, Michael K. ; Allen, Answorth A. ; Weiland, Andrew J. ; Cavanaugh, John ; Noonan, Dennis ; Lyman, Stephen. / One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair. In: HSS Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 117-122.
@article{9c97a8f9746749449e9ad51c0ed5ad20,
title = "One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair",
abstract = "There are several techniques that have been described for distal biceps tendon repair but there is still controversy regarding the optimal technique. Our hypothesis is that the single-incision technique will have a similar complication rate and functionally equivalent restoration of function compared with the two-incision approach. A retrospective review of consecutive biceps tendon repairs was performed at one institution over a 5-year period. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria and 26 were available for follow-up including subjective assessment, physical examination, and strength testing. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach utilized: 12 patients underwent single-incision repair and 14 had a two-incision repair. The average follow-up was 33 months (minimum 13; maximum 75). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to flexion strength or endurance, supination strength or endurance, or complication rates between the two techniques. In conclusion, both surgical techniques led to adequate restoration of strength with a low complication rate. Both techniques are safe to perform and should be guided by surgeon comfort with the approach.",
author = "Johnson, {Timothy S.} and Johnson, {David C.} and Shindle, {Michael K.} and Allen, {Answorth A.} and Weiland, {Andrew J.} and John Cavanaugh and Dennis Noonan and Stephen Lyman",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11420-008-9085-4",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "117--122",
journal = "HSS Journal",
issn = "1556-3316",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One- versus two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair

AU - Johnson, Timothy S.

AU - Johnson, David C.

AU - Shindle, Michael K.

AU - Allen, Answorth A.

AU - Weiland, Andrew J.

AU - Cavanaugh, John

AU - Noonan, Dennis

AU - Lyman, Stephen

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - There are several techniques that have been described for distal biceps tendon repair but there is still controversy regarding the optimal technique. Our hypothesis is that the single-incision technique will have a similar complication rate and functionally equivalent restoration of function compared with the two-incision approach. A retrospective review of consecutive biceps tendon repairs was performed at one institution over a 5-year period. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria and 26 were available for follow-up including subjective assessment, physical examination, and strength testing. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach utilized: 12 patients underwent single-incision repair and 14 had a two-incision repair. The average follow-up was 33 months (minimum 13; maximum 75). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to flexion strength or endurance, supination strength or endurance, or complication rates between the two techniques. In conclusion, both surgical techniques led to adequate restoration of strength with a low complication rate. Both techniques are safe to perform and should be guided by surgeon comfort with the approach.

AB - There are several techniques that have been described for distal biceps tendon repair but there is still controversy regarding the optimal technique. Our hypothesis is that the single-incision technique will have a similar complication rate and functionally equivalent restoration of function compared with the two-incision approach. A retrospective review of consecutive biceps tendon repairs was performed at one institution over a 5-year period. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria and 26 were available for follow-up including subjective assessment, physical examination, and strength testing. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach utilized: 12 patients underwent single-incision repair and 14 had a two-incision repair. The average follow-up was 33 months (minimum 13; maximum 75). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to flexion strength or endurance, supination strength or endurance, or complication rates between the two techniques. In conclusion, both surgical techniques led to adequate restoration of strength with a low complication rate. Both techniques are safe to perform and should be guided by surgeon comfort with the approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52949140152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52949140152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11420-008-9085-4

DO - 10.1007/s11420-008-9085-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 18815854

AN - SCOPUS:52949140152

VL - 4

SP - 117

EP - 122

JO - HSS Journal

JF - HSS Journal

SN - 1556-3316

IS - 2

ER -