Optimal choice between feedforward and feedback control in gene expression to cope with unpredictable danger

Emi Shudo, Patsy Haccou, Yoh Iwasa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All organisms face risks of unpredictable danger caused by harmful physical environments, pathogens, parasites or predators. Organisms may have several alternative ways of coping with such dangers. These differ in cost, effectiveness and activation time. We study the conditions under which it is optimal to use different alternatives for damage control. As an example we consider a microbe (such as E. coli), which may experience heat shocks that cause denaturation of proteins in the cell. To restore the denatured proteins the organism produces heat-shock proteins (HSP). There are two different pathways for production of HSP. Some HSP are produced immediately after a heat shock (feedforward control), but additional HSP may be produced thereafter, stimulated by the presence of denatured proteins (feedback control). Feedforward is based solely on heat-shock intensity without accurate information on the resulting amount of denatured proteins. We examine the optimal combination of the two pathways that minimizes the sum of the damage caused by the presence of untreated denatured proteins and the production cost of HSP. The optimal response depends on the time delay for feedback control, the effectiveness of HSP in processing denatured proteins, the production cost of HSP, the severity of damage by denatured proteins and the probability distribution of the abundance of denatured protein conditional on heat-shock intensity. We find that feedforward control should always be used. Additional HSP may be produced by feedback control when the abundance of denatured protein is large whilst no feedback control should be used when it is small. All the HSP are produced by feedforward control when the maximum is close to the mean of denatured protein abundance conditional on the heat-shock intensity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-160
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Theoretical Biology
Volume223
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 21 2003

Fingerprint

Feedforward Control
Heat Shock Protein
Feedforward control
Heat-Shock Proteins
heat shock proteins
Gene expression
Feedback Control
Feedback control
Gene Expression
Proteins
Protein
gene expression
heat stress
Shock
Hot Temperature
proteins
Heat
Damage
production costs
organisms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

Optimal choice between feedforward and feedback control in gene expression to cope with unpredictable danger. / Shudo, Emi; Haccou, Patsy; Iwasa, Yoh.

In: Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 223, No. 2, 21.07.2003, p. 149-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2aafe8131f14be488e23b5064ae2c85,
title = "Optimal choice between feedforward and feedback control in gene expression to cope with unpredictable danger",
abstract = "All organisms face risks of unpredictable danger caused by harmful physical environments, pathogens, parasites or predators. Organisms may have several alternative ways of coping with such dangers. These differ in cost, effectiveness and activation time. We study the conditions under which it is optimal to use different alternatives for damage control. As an example we consider a microbe (such as E. coli), which may experience heat shocks that cause denaturation of proteins in the cell. To restore the denatured proteins the organism produces heat-shock proteins (HSP). There are two different pathways for production of HSP. Some HSP are produced immediately after a heat shock (feedforward control), but additional HSP may be produced thereafter, stimulated by the presence of denatured proteins (feedback control). Feedforward is based solely on heat-shock intensity without accurate information on the resulting amount of denatured proteins. We examine the optimal combination of the two pathways that minimizes the sum of the damage caused by the presence of untreated denatured proteins and the production cost of HSP. The optimal response depends on the time delay for feedback control, the effectiveness of HSP in processing denatured proteins, the production cost of HSP, the severity of damage by denatured proteins and the probability distribution of the abundance of denatured protein conditional on heat-shock intensity. We find that feedforward control should always be used. Additional HSP may be produced by feedback control when the abundance of denatured protein is large whilst no feedback control should be used when it is small. All the HSP are produced by feedforward control when the maximum is close to the mean of denatured protein abundance conditional on the heat-shock intensity.",
author = "Emi Shudo and Patsy Haccou and Yoh Iwasa",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00081-X",
language = "English",
volume = "223",
pages = "149--160",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical Biology",
issn = "0022-5193",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal choice between feedforward and feedback control in gene expression to cope with unpredictable danger

AU - Shudo, Emi

AU - Haccou, Patsy

AU - Iwasa, Yoh

PY - 2003/7/21

Y1 - 2003/7/21

N2 - All organisms face risks of unpredictable danger caused by harmful physical environments, pathogens, parasites or predators. Organisms may have several alternative ways of coping with such dangers. These differ in cost, effectiveness and activation time. We study the conditions under which it is optimal to use different alternatives for damage control. As an example we consider a microbe (such as E. coli), which may experience heat shocks that cause denaturation of proteins in the cell. To restore the denatured proteins the organism produces heat-shock proteins (HSP). There are two different pathways for production of HSP. Some HSP are produced immediately after a heat shock (feedforward control), but additional HSP may be produced thereafter, stimulated by the presence of denatured proteins (feedback control). Feedforward is based solely on heat-shock intensity without accurate information on the resulting amount of denatured proteins. We examine the optimal combination of the two pathways that minimizes the sum of the damage caused by the presence of untreated denatured proteins and the production cost of HSP. The optimal response depends on the time delay for feedback control, the effectiveness of HSP in processing denatured proteins, the production cost of HSP, the severity of damage by denatured proteins and the probability distribution of the abundance of denatured protein conditional on heat-shock intensity. We find that feedforward control should always be used. Additional HSP may be produced by feedback control when the abundance of denatured protein is large whilst no feedback control should be used when it is small. All the HSP are produced by feedforward control when the maximum is close to the mean of denatured protein abundance conditional on the heat-shock intensity.

AB - All organisms face risks of unpredictable danger caused by harmful physical environments, pathogens, parasites or predators. Organisms may have several alternative ways of coping with such dangers. These differ in cost, effectiveness and activation time. We study the conditions under which it is optimal to use different alternatives for damage control. As an example we consider a microbe (such as E. coli), which may experience heat shocks that cause denaturation of proteins in the cell. To restore the denatured proteins the organism produces heat-shock proteins (HSP). There are two different pathways for production of HSP. Some HSP are produced immediately after a heat shock (feedforward control), but additional HSP may be produced thereafter, stimulated by the presence of denatured proteins (feedback control). Feedforward is based solely on heat-shock intensity without accurate information on the resulting amount of denatured proteins. We examine the optimal combination of the two pathways that minimizes the sum of the damage caused by the presence of untreated denatured proteins and the production cost of HSP. The optimal response depends on the time delay for feedback control, the effectiveness of HSP in processing denatured proteins, the production cost of HSP, the severity of damage by denatured proteins and the probability distribution of the abundance of denatured protein conditional on heat-shock intensity. We find that feedforward control should always be used. Additional HSP may be produced by feedback control when the abundance of denatured protein is large whilst no feedback control should be used when it is small. All the HSP are produced by feedforward control when the maximum is close to the mean of denatured protein abundance conditional on the heat-shock intensity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038581536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038581536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00081-X

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00081-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 12814598

AN - SCOPUS:0038581536

VL - 223

SP - 149

EP - 160

JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology

JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology

SN - 0022-5193

IS - 2

ER -