Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in 321 recipients

Hideaki Uchiyama, Ken Shirabe, Koichi Kimura, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Toru Ikegami, Norifumi Harimoto, Yoshihiko Maehara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective investigation in order to clarify whether selecting the type of liver graft had an impact on outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT). Data from the medical records of the donors and the recipients of 321 consecutive cases of AALDLT performed between April 2004 and March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Our general criteria for selecting the type of liver graft was that a left graft was preferentially selected when the estimated volume of the left graft was ≥35% of the standard liver volume of the recipient, and that a right graft was selected only when the estimated remnant liver volume of the donor was ≥35% of the total liver volume. In this series, 177 left grafts, 136 right grafts, and 8 posterior grafts were used. The left grafts tended to have 2 or more arteries, whereas the right grafts tended to have 2 or more bile duct orifices. The graft survival curves and the incidences of severe complications were comparable between the AALDLT using right grafts and the AALDLT using left grafts. The preoperative estimation of graft size hardly enabled us to predict severe posttransplant complication. Moreover, small-for-size graft syndrome occurred regardless of the estimated graft volumes. Instead, donor age was a significant risk factor for small-for-size graft syndrome. In conclusion, left grafts should be more aggressively used for the sake of donors' safety. The use of hepatic grafts from older donors should be avoided if possible in order to circumvent troublesome posttransplant complications. Liver Transpl 22:305-315, 2016.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-315
Number of pages11
JournalLiver Transplantation
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Living Donors
Liver Transplantation
Transplants
Liver
Tissue Donors
Graft Survival

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Hepatology
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in 321 recipients. / Uchiyama, Hideaki; Shirabe, Ken; Kimura, Koichi; Yoshizumi, Tomoharu; Ikegami, Toru; Harimoto, Norifumi; Maehara, Yoshihiko.

In: Liver Transplantation, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 305-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uchiyama, Hideaki ; Shirabe, Ken ; Kimura, Koichi ; Yoshizumi, Tomoharu ; Ikegami, Toru ; Harimoto, Norifumi ; Maehara, Yoshihiko. / Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in 321 recipients. In: Liver Transplantation. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 305-315.
@article{cd3bc0de384642bb9e0a785f939a4cef,
title = "Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in 321 recipients",
abstract = "We conducted a retrospective investigation in order to clarify whether selecting the type of liver graft had an impact on outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT). Data from the medical records of the donors and the recipients of 321 consecutive cases of AALDLT performed between April 2004 and March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Our general criteria for selecting the type of liver graft was that a left graft was preferentially selected when the estimated volume of the left graft was ≥35{\%} of the standard liver volume of the recipient, and that a right graft was selected only when the estimated remnant liver volume of the donor was ≥35{\%} of the total liver volume. In this series, 177 left grafts, 136 right grafts, and 8 posterior grafts were used. The left grafts tended to have 2 or more arteries, whereas the right grafts tended to have 2 or more bile duct orifices. The graft survival curves and the incidences of severe complications were comparable between the AALDLT using right grafts and the AALDLT using left grafts. The preoperative estimation of graft size hardly enabled us to predict severe posttransplant complication. Moreover, small-for-size graft syndrome occurred regardless of the estimated graft volumes. Instead, donor age was a significant risk factor for small-for-size graft syndrome. In conclusion, left grafts should be more aggressively used for the sake of donors' safety. The use of hepatic grafts from older donors should be avoided if possible in order to circumvent troublesome posttransplant complications. Liver Transpl 22:305-315, 2016.",
author = "Hideaki Uchiyama and Ken Shirabe and Koichi Kimura and Tomoharu Yoshizumi and Toru Ikegami and Norifumi Harimoto and Yoshihiko Maehara",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lt.24378",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "305--315",
journal = "Liver Transplantation",
issn = "1527-6465",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in 321 recipients

AU - Uchiyama, Hideaki

AU - Shirabe, Ken

AU - Kimura, Koichi

AU - Yoshizumi, Tomoharu

AU - Ikegami, Toru

AU - Harimoto, Norifumi

AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - We conducted a retrospective investigation in order to clarify whether selecting the type of liver graft had an impact on outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT). Data from the medical records of the donors and the recipients of 321 consecutive cases of AALDLT performed between April 2004 and March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Our general criteria for selecting the type of liver graft was that a left graft was preferentially selected when the estimated volume of the left graft was ≥35% of the standard liver volume of the recipient, and that a right graft was selected only when the estimated remnant liver volume of the donor was ≥35% of the total liver volume. In this series, 177 left grafts, 136 right grafts, and 8 posterior grafts were used. The left grafts tended to have 2 or more arteries, whereas the right grafts tended to have 2 or more bile duct orifices. The graft survival curves and the incidences of severe complications were comparable between the AALDLT using right grafts and the AALDLT using left grafts. The preoperative estimation of graft size hardly enabled us to predict severe posttransplant complication. Moreover, small-for-size graft syndrome occurred regardless of the estimated graft volumes. Instead, donor age was a significant risk factor for small-for-size graft syndrome. In conclusion, left grafts should be more aggressively used for the sake of donors' safety. The use of hepatic grafts from older donors should be avoided if possible in order to circumvent troublesome posttransplant complications. Liver Transpl 22:305-315, 2016.

AB - We conducted a retrospective investigation in order to clarify whether selecting the type of liver graft had an impact on outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT). Data from the medical records of the donors and the recipients of 321 consecutive cases of AALDLT performed between April 2004 and March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Our general criteria for selecting the type of liver graft was that a left graft was preferentially selected when the estimated volume of the left graft was ≥35% of the standard liver volume of the recipient, and that a right graft was selected only when the estimated remnant liver volume of the donor was ≥35% of the total liver volume. In this series, 177 left grafts, 136 right grafts, and 8 posterior grafts were used. The left grafts tended to have 2 or more arteries, whereas the right grafts tended to have 2 or more bile duct orifices. The graft survival curves and the incidences of severe complications were comparable between the AALDLT using right grafts and the AALDLT using left grafts. The preoperative estimation of graft size hardly enabled us to predict severe posttransplant complication. Moreover, small-for-size graft syndrome occurred regardless of the estimated graft volumes. Instead, donor age was a significant risk factor for small-for-size graft syndrome. In conclusion, left grafts should be more aggressively used for the sake of donors' safety. The use of hepatic grafts from older donors should be avoided if possible in order to circumvent troublesome posttransplant complications. Liver Transpl 22:305-315, 2016.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959352965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959352965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lt.24378

DO - 10.1002/lt.24378

M3 - Article

C2 - 26610068

AN - SCOPUS:84959352965

VL - 22

SP - 305

EP - 315

JO - Liver Transplantation

JF - Liver Transplantation

SN - 1527-6465

IS - 3

ER -