Parametrizations of triaxial deformation and E2 transitions of the wobbling band

Yoshifumi Shimizu, Takuya Shoji, Masayuki Matsuzaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are various different definitions for the triaxial deformation parameter "γ". It is pointed out that the parameter conventionally used in the Nilsson (or Woods-Saxon) potential, γ(pot:Nils) [or γ(pot:WS)], is not appropriate for representing the triaxiality γ defined in terms of the intrinsic quadrupole moments. The difference between the two can be as large as a factor two in the case of the triaxial superdeformed bands recently observed in Hf and Lu nuclei, i.e., γ(pot:Nils) ≈ 20° corresponds to γ ≈ 10°. In our previous work, we studied the wobbling excitations in Lu nuclei using the microscopic framework of the cranked Nilsson mean-field and the random phase approximation. The most serious problem was that the calculated B(E2) value is about factor two too small. It is shown that the origin of this underestimate can mainly be attributed to the small triaxial deformation parameter γ ≈ 10° that corresponds to γ(pot:Nils) ≈ 20°. If the same triaxial deformation parameter is used as in the analysis of the particle-rotor model, γ ≈ 20°, the calculated B(E2) gives correct magnitude of the experimental data.

Original languageEnglish
Article number024319
JournalPhysical Review C - Nuclear Physics
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 10 2008

Fingerprint

triaxial stresses
nuclei
rotors
quadrupoles
moments
approximation
excitation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Cite this

Parametrizations of triaxial deformation and E2 transitions of the wobbling band. / Shimizu, Yoshifumi; Shoji, Takuya; Matsuzaki, Masayuki.

In: Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, Vol. 77, No. 2, 024319, 10.03.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shimizu, Yoshifumi ; Shoji, Takuya ; Matsuzaki, Masayuki. / Parametrizations of triaxial deformation and E2 transitions of the wobbling band. In: Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics. 2008 ; Vol. 77, No. 2.
@article{20263ec28cca48e994afca5cccc61e3a,
title = "Parametrizations of triaxial deformation and E2 transitions of the wobbling band",
abstract = "There are various different definitions for the triaxial deformation parameter {"}γ{"}. It is pointed out that the parameter conventionally used in the Nilsson (or Woods-Saxon) potential, γ(pot:Nils) [or γ(pot:WS)], is not appropriate for representing the triaxiality γ defined in terms of the intrinsic quadrupole moments. The difference between the two can be as large as a factor two in the case of the triaxial superdeformed bands recently observed in Hf and Lu nuclei, i.e., γ(pot:Nils) ≈ 20° corresponds to γ ≈ 10°. In our previous work, we studied the wobbling excitations in Lu nuclei using the microscopic framework of the cranked Nilsson mean-field and the random phase approximation. The most serious problem was that the calculated B(E2) value is about factor two too small. It is shown that the origin of this underestimate can mainly be attributed to the small triaxial deformation parameter γ ≈ 10° that corresponds to γ(pot:Nils) ≈ 20°. If the same triaxial deformation parameter is used as in the analysis of the particle-rotor model, γ ≈ 20°, the calculated B(E2) gives correct magnitude of the experimental data.",
author = "Yoshifumi Shimizu and Takuya Shoji and Masayuki Matsuzaki",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024319",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
journal = "Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics",
issn = "0556-2813",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parametrizations of triaxial deformation and E2 transitions of the wobbling band

AU - Shimizu, Yoshifumi

AU - Shoji, Takuya

AU - Matsuzaki, Masayuki

PY - 2008/3/10

Y1 - 2008/3/10

N2 - There are various different definitions for the triaxial deformation parameter "γ". It is pointed out that the parameter conventionally used in the Nilsson (or Woods-Saxon) potential, γ(pot:Nils) [or γ(pot:WS)], is not appropriate for representing the triaxiality γ defined in terms of the intrinsic quadrupole moments. The difference between the two can be as large as a factor two in the case of the triaxial superdeformed bands recently observed in Hf and Lu nuclei, i.e., γ(pot:Nils) ≈ 20° corresponds to γ ≈ 10°. In our previous work, we studied the wobbling excitations in Lu nuclei using the microscopic framework of the cranked Nilsson mean-field and the random phase approximation. The most serious problem was that the calculated B(E2) value is about factor two too small. It is shown that the origin of this underestimate can mainly be attributed to the small triaxial deformation parameter γ ≈ 10° that corresponds to γ(pot:Nils) ≈ 20°. If the same triaxial deformation parameter is used as in the analysis of the particle-rotor model, γ ≈ 20°, the calculated B(E2) gives correct magnitude of the experimental data.

AB - There are various different definitions for the triaxial deformation parameter "γ". It is pointed out that the parameter conventionally used in the Nilsson (or Woods-Saxon) potential, γ(pot:Nils) [or γ(pot:WS)], is not appropriate for representing the triaxiality γ defined in terms of the intrinsic quadrupole moments. The difference between the two can be as large as a factor two in the case of the triaxial superdeformed bands recently observed in Hf and Lu nuclei, i.e., γ(pot:Nils) ≈ 20° corresponds to γ ≈ 10°. In our previous work, we studied the wobbling excitations in Lu nuclei using the microscopic framework of the cranked Nilsson mean-field and the random phase approximation. The most serious problem was that the calculated B(E2) value is about factor two too small. It is shown that the origin of this underestimate can mainly be attributed to the small triaxial deformation parameter γ ≈ 10° that corresponds to γ(pot:Nils) ≈ 20°. If the same triaxial deformation parameter is used as in the analysis of the particle-rotor model, γ ≈ 20°, the calculated B(E2) gives correct magnitude of the experimental data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41049095124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41049095124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024319

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024319

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:41049095124

VL - 77

JO - Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

JF - Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

SN - 0556-2813

IS - 2

M1 - 024319

ER -