Pattern of Lymphatic Spread of Esophageal Cancer at the Cervicothoracic Junction Based on the Tumor Location: Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervicothoracic Junction

Makoto Yamasaki, Hiroshi Miyata, Yasuhiro Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Shuji Takiguchi, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus about the extent of lymphadenectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at the cervicothoracic junction (CT-ESCC). The purpose of this study was to examine the pattern of lymph node spread in patients with CT-ESCC and the extent of lymphadenectomy that is necessary. Methods: We included 64 consecutive patients with CT-ESCC who underwent surgery. All patients were divided into two groups based on the location of the epicenter or anal edge of the primary tumor. Using the height of the epicenter, 27 and 37 patients were classified as having cervical-centered and thoracic-centered tumors, respectively; while, using the height of the anal edge, 38 and 26 patients had tumors that were cervical-localized and thoracic-invading, respectively. Results: In the patients with cervical-centered tumors, the incidences of metastasis and/or recurrences in the cervical paraesophageal, supraclavicular, and upper mediastinal nodes were 21.4–28.5 %. No patient had metastasis or recurrence in the middle and lower mediastinal and perigastric nodes. In patients with thoracic-centered tumors, the lymph node metastasis and/or recurrence spread to the cervical paraesophageal (41.7 %), supraclavicular (25 %), and upper mediastinal (55.6 %) nodes, as well as the middle (22.2 %) and lower mediastinal (8.3 %) and perigastric (19.4 %) nodes. There was no difference in the distribution and incidence of lymphatic spread between patients with the cervical-localized and thoracic-invading classifications. Conclusions: Our results indicate a cervical and upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy is better indicated for patients with cervical-centered CT-ESCC, whereas patients with thoracic-centered CT-ESCC should be treated with a three-field lymphadenectomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)750-757
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esophageal Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Lymph Node Excision
Thorax
Therapeutics
Neoplasm Metastasis
Recurrence
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Lymph Nodes
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Pattern of Lymphatic Spread of Esophageal Cancer at the Cervicothoracic Junction Based on the Tumor Location : Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervicothoracic Junction. / Yamasaki, Makoto; Miyata, Hiroshi; Miyazaki, Yasuhiro; Takahashi, Tsuyoshi; Kurokawa, Yukinori; Nakajima, Kiyokazu; Takiguchi, Shuji; Mori, Masaki; Doki, Yuichiro.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 22, 01.12.2015, p. 750-757.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yamasaki, Makoto ; Miyata, Hiroshi ; Miyazaki, Yasuhiro ; Takahashi, Tsuyoshi ; Kurokawa, Yukinori ; Nakajima, Kiyokazu ; Takiguchi, Shuji ; Mori, Masaki ; Doki, Yuichiro. / Pattern of Lymphatic Spread of Esophageal Cancer at the Cervicothoracic Junction Based on the Tumor Location : Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervicothoracic Junction. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2015 ; Vol. 22. pp. 750-757.
@article{464c7ef5b6114755ae45a66ec6ff2601,
title = "Pattern of Lymphatic Spread of Esophageal Cancer at the Cervicothoracic Junction Based on the Tumor Location: Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervicothoracic Junction",
abstract = "Background: There is no consensus about the extent of lymphadenectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at the cervicothoracic junction (CT-ESCC). The purpose of this study was to examine the pattern of lymph node spread in patients with CT-ESCC and the extent of lymphadenectomy that is necessary. Methods: We included 64 consecutive patients with CT-ESCC who underwent surgery. All patients were divided into two groups based on the location of the epicenter or anal edge of the primary tumor. Using the height of the epicenter, 27 and 37 patients were classified as having cervical-centered and thoracic-centered tumors, respectively; while, using the height of the anal edge, 38 and 26 patients had tumors that were cervical-localized and thoracic-invading, respectively. Results: In the patients with cervical-centered tumors, the incidences of metastasis and/or recurrences in the cervical paraesophageal, supraclavicular, and upper mediastinal nodes were 21.4–28.5 {\%}. No patient had metastasis or recurrence in the middle and lower mediastinal and perigastric nodes. In patients with thoracic-centered tumors, the lymph node metastasis and/or recurrence spread to the cervical paraesophageal (41.7 {\%}), supraclavicular (25 {\%}), and upper mediastinal (55.6 {\%}) nodes, as well as the middle (22.2 {\%}) and lower mediastinal (8.3 {\%}) and perigastric (19.4 {\%}) nodes. There was no difference in the distribution and incidence of lymphatic spread between patients with the cervical-localized and thoracic-invading classifications. Conclusions: Our results indicate a cervical and upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy is better indicated for patients with cervical-centered CT-ESCC, whereas patients with thoracic-centered CT-ESCC should be treated with a three-field lymphadenectomy.",
author = "Makoto Yamasaki and Hiroshi Miyata and Yasuhiro Miyazaki and Tsuyoshi Takahashi and Yukinori Kurokawa and Kiyokazu Nakajima and Shuji Takiguchi and Masaki Mori and Yuichiro Doki",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-015-4855-y",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "750--757",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pattern of Lymphatic Spread of Esophageal Cancer at the Cervicothoracic Junction Based on the Tumor Location

T2 - Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervicothoracic Junction

AU - Yamasaki, Makoto

AU - Miyata, Hiroshi

AU - Miyazaki, Yasuhiro

AU - Takahashi, Tsuyoshi

AU - Kurokawa, Yukinori

AU - Nakajima, Kiyokazu

AU - Takiguchi, Shuji

AU - Mori, Masaki

AU - Doki, Yuichiro

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Background: There is no consensus about the extent of lymphadenectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at the cervicothoracic junction (CT-ESCC). The purpose of this study was to examine the pattern of lymph node spread in patients with CT-ESCC and the extent of lymphadenectomy that is necessary. Methods: We included 64 consecutive patients with CT-ESCC who underwent surgery. All patients were divided into two groups based on the location of the epicenter or anal edge of the primary tumor. Using the height of the epicenter, 27 and 37 patients were classified as having cervical-centered and thoracic-centered tumors, respectively; while, using the height of the anal edge, 38 and 26 patients had tumors that were cervical-localized and thoracic-invading, respectively. Results: In the patients with cervical-centered tumors, the incidences of metastasis and/or recurrences in the cervical paraesophageal, supraclavicular, and upper mediastinal nodes were 21.4–28.5 %. No patient had metastasis or recurrence in the middle and lower mediastinal and perigastric nodes. In patients with thoracic-centered tumors, the lymph node metastasis and/or recurrence spread to the cervical paraesophageal (41.7 %), supraclavicular (25 %), and upper mediastinal (55.6 %) nodes, as well as the middle (22.2 %) and lower mediastinal (8.3 %) and perigastric (19.4 %) nodes. There was no difference in the distribution and incidence of lymphatic spread between patients with the cervical-localized and thoracic-invading classifications. Conclusions: Our results indicate a cervical and upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy is better indicated for patients with cervical-centered CT-ESCC, whereas patients with thoracic-centered CT-ESCC should be treated with a three-field lymphadenectomy.

AB - Background: There is no consensus about the extent of lymphadenectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at the cervicothoracic junction (CT-ESCC). The purpose of this study was to examine the pattern of lymph node spread in patients with CT-ESCC and the extent of lymphadenectomy that is necessary. Methods: We included 64 consecutive patients with CT-ESCC who underwent surgery. All patients were divided into two groups based on the location of the epicenter or anal edge of the primary tumor. Using the height of the epicenter, 27 and 37 patients were classified as having cervical-centered and thoracic-centered tumors, respectively; while, using the height of the anal edge, 38 and 26 patients had tumors that were cervical-localized and thoracic-invading, respectively. Results: In the patients with cervical-centered tumors, the incidences of metastasis and/or recurrences in the cervical paraesophageal, supraclavicular, and upper mediastinal nodes were 21.4–28.5 %. No patient had metastasis or recurrence in the middle and lower mediastinal and perigastric nodes. In patients with thoracic-centered tumors, the lymph node metastasis and/or recurrence spread to the cervical paraesophageal (41.7 %), supraclavicular (25 %), and upper mediastinal (55.6 %) nodes, as well as the middle (22.2 %) and lower mediastinal (8.3 %) and perigastric (19.4 %) nodes. There was no difference in the distribution and incidence of lymphatic spread between patients with the cervical-localized and thoracic-invading classifications. Conclusions: Our results indicate a cervical and upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy is better indicated for patients with cervical-centered CT-ESCC, whereas patients with thoracic-centered CT-ESCC should be treated with a three-field lymphadenectomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952876903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952876903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-015-4855-y

DO - 10.1245/s10434-015-4855-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 26350372

AN - SCOPUS:84952876903

VL - 22

SP - 750

EP - 757

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

ER -