Abstract
Background & aims: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) are long-term vascular access devices inserted through a peripheral vein of the arm and serve as an alternative to traditional central venous catheters. Currently different types of PICCs are available. No data, however, are available in regard to materials and tip designs. We designed a prospective, randomized trial comparing two major PICCs with different material and tip design: a silicone catheter with distal side slits (Groshong Catheter) and a polyurethane catheter with open-end tip (PI Catheter). Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent PICCs placement between August 2010 and December 2010 were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of PICC indication. Secondary endpoints were complications rate. Result: The completion rate of PICC indication was not different significantly (81.8% and 92.9%, p=0.5648) and the total complication rate were also not different significantly (9.1% and 14.3%, P=1.0000) between two catheters. In detail, PI Catheter were associated with a significantly higher incidence of catheter occlusion, and Groshong Catheter were associated with a significantly hemorrhages after removal. Conclusion: There was no difference in the durability and the complication between Groshong Catheter and PI Catheter. (UMIN Clinical Trial Registry UMIN000005451).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 48-52 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Clinical Nutrition |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 1 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Cite this
Performance comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in gastrointestinal surgery : A randomized controlled trial. / Miyagaki, Hiromichi; Nakajima, Kiyokazu; Hara, Joji; Yamasaki, Makoto; Kurokawa, Yukinori; Miyata, Hiroshi; Takiguchi, Shuji; Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki; Mori, Masaki; Doki, Yuichiro.
In: Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.02.2012, p. 48-52.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in gastrointestinal surgery
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Miyagaki, Hiromichi
AU - Nakajima, Kiyokazu
AU - Hara, Joji
AU - Yamasaki, Makoto
AU - Kurokawa, Yukinori
AU - Miyata, Hiroshi
AU - Takiguchi, Shuji
AU - Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
AU - Mori, Masaki
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
PY - 2012/2/1
Y1 - 2012/2/1
N2 - Background & aims: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) are long-term vascular access devices inserted through a peripheral vein of the arm and serve as an alternative to traditional central venous catheters. Currently different types of PICCs are available. No data, however, are available in regard to materials and tip designs. We designed a prospective, randomized trial comparing two major PICCs with different material and tip design: a silicone catheter with distal side slits (Groshong Catheter) and a polyurethane catheter with open-end tip (PI Catheter). Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent PICCs placement between August 2010 and December 2010 were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of PICC indication. Secondary endpoints were complications rate. Result: The completion rate of PICC indication was not different significantly (81.8% and 92.9%, p=0.5648) and the total complication rate were also not different significantly (9.1% and 14.3%, P=1.0000) between two catheters. In detail, PI Catheter were associated with a significantly higher incidence of catheter occlusion, and Groshong Catheter were associated with a significantly hemorrhages after removal. Conclusion: There was no difference in the durability and the complication between Groshong Catheter and PI Catheter. (UMIN Clinical Trial Registry UMIN000005451).
AB - Background & aims: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) are long-term vascular access devices inserted through a peripheral vein of the arm and serve as an alternative to traditional central venous catheters. Currently different types of PICCs are available. No data, however, are available in regard to materials and tip designs. We designed a prospective, randomized trial comparing two major PICCs with different material and tip design: a silicone catheter with distal side slits (Groshong Catheter) and a polyurethane catheter with open-end tip (PI Catheter). Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent PICCs placement between August 2010 and December 2010 were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of PICC indication. Secondary endpoints were complications rate. Result: The completion rate of PICC indication was not different significantly (81.8% and 92.9%, p=0.5648) and the total complication rate were also not different significantly (9.1% and 14.3%, P=1.0000) between two catheters. In detail, PI Catheter were associated with a significantly higher incidence of catheter occlusion, and Groshong Catheter were associated with a significantly hemorrhages after removal. Conclusion: There was no difference in the durability and the complication between Groshong Catheter and PI Catheter. (UMIN Clinical Trial Registry UMIN000005451).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856228304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856228304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.09.002
DO - 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.09.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 21945145
AN - SCOPUS:84856228304
VL - 31
SP - 48
EP - 52
JO - Clinical Nutrition
JF - Clinical Nutrition
SN - 0261-5614
IS - 1
ER -