TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of the Japanese GFR equation in potential kidney donors
AU - Horio, Masaru
AU - Yasuda, Yoshinari
AU - Kaimori, Jyunya
AU - Ichimaru, Naotsugu
AU - Isaka, Yoshitaka
AU - Takahara, Shiro
AU - Nishi, Shinichi
AU - Uchida, Kazuharu
AU - Takeda, Asami
AU - Hattori, Ryohei
AU - Kitada, Hidehisa
AU - Tsuruya, Kazuhiko
AU - Imai, Enyu
AU - Takahashi, Kota
AU - Watanabe, Tsuyoshi
AU - Matsuo, Seiichi
N1 - Funding Information:
The following investigators participated in the present study: Kazunari Tanabe (Tokyo Women’s Medical University), Hideki Ishida (Tokyo Women’s Medical University), Hattori Motoshi (Tokyo Women’s Medical University), Chikamoto Hiroko (Tokyo Women’s Medical University), Keiko Uchida (Tokyo Women’s Medical University), Atsushi Aikawa (Toho University), Ken Sakai (Toho University), Kazuhide Saito (Niigata University), Kunio Morozumi (Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital), Norihiko Goto (Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital), Schoichi Maruyama (Nagoya University), Yasuhiro Okabe (Kyushu University), Yoshifumi Miura (Kyushu University), Kei Kurihara (Kyushu University), Soushi Terasaka (Kyushu University), Sayako Kawanami (Kyushu University), Kohsuke Masutani (Kyushu University), Toshiaki Nakano (Kyushu University), Akihiro Tsuchimoto (Kyushu University) and Akiko Fujisaki (Kyushu University). This study was supported in part by a grant from the Japanese Society of Nephrology and a Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare on Renal Research, Japan.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Background Japanese GFR equation was developed from mainly chronic kidney disease (CKD) subjects. Only a small number of healthy subjects were included in the development and validation of the GFR equation. We assessed the performance of the equation in potential kidney donors. Methods A total of 113 potential kidney donors was included. The data of CKD subjects that were previously reported were also included for comparison. GFR (mGFR) was measured by inulin clearance. The estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated by the Japanese GFR equation. Bias of the equation (eGFR-mGFR) and urinary creatinine excretion were evaluated. Results There was no significant difference between eGFR and mGFR in 340 CKD subjects (54.2 ± 31.6 and 55.7 ± 33.2 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively). Contrarily, the eGFR was significantly lower than mGFR in 113 potential kidney donors (78.9 ± 16.2 and 93.6 ± 19.2 ml/min/ 1.73 m2, respectively). The biases in potential kidney donors with eGFR 30-59 and 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 were significantly greater than those in CKD subjects (-19.2 ± 12.2 and-18.3 ± 16.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 in potential kidney donors and-3.8 ± 15.6 and-3.4 ± 17.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 in CKD subjects, respectively). Creatinine excretion per body weight of potential kidney donors was significantly higher than that of CKD subjects, suggesting higher creatinine generation in potential kidney donors. Conclusion The Japanese GFR equation underestimated GFR in potential kidney donors. Higher creatinine generation compared with CKD subjects may contribute to the underestimation of GFR by the Japanese GFR equation in potential kidney donors.
AB - Background Japanese GFR equation was developed from mainly chronic kidney disease (CKD) subjects. Only a small number of healthy subjects were included in the development and validation of the GFR equation. We assessed the performance of the equation in potential kidney donors. Methods A total of 113 potential kidney donors was included. The data of CKD subjects that were previously reported were also included for comparison. GFR (mGFR) was measured by inulin clearance. The estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated by the Japanese GFR equation. Bias of the equation (eGFR-mGFR) and urinary creatinine excretion were evaluated. Results There was no significant difference between eGFR and mGFR in 340 CKD subjects (54.2 ± 31.6 and 55.7 ± 33.2 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively). Contrarily, the eGFR was significantly lower than mGFR in 113 potential kidney donors (78.9 ± 16.2 and 93.6 ± 19.2 ml/min/ 1.73 m2, respectively). The biases in potential kidney donors with eGFR 30-59 and 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 were significantly greater than those in CKD subjects (-19.2 ± 12.2 and-18.3 ± 16.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 in potential kidney donors and-3.8 ± 15.6 and-3.4 ± 17.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 in CKD subjects, respectively). Creatinine excretion per body weight of potential kidney donors was significantly higher than that of CKD subjects, suggesting higher creatinine generation in potential kidney donors. Conclusion The Japanese GFR equation underestimated GFR in potential kidney donors. Higher creatinine generation compared with CKD subjects may contribute to the underestimation of GFR by the Japanese GFR equation in potential kidney donors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859635207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859635207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10157-012-0586-6
DO - 10.1007/s10157-012-0586-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 22270186
AN - SCOPUS:84859635207
VL - 16
SP - 415
EP - 420
JO - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
JF - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
SN - 1342-1751
IS - 3
ER -