Phonemic restoration of interrupted locally time-reversed speech: Effects of segment duration and noise levels

Kazuo Ueda, Valter Ciocca

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Intelligibility of temporally degraded speech was investigated with locally time-reversed speech (LTR) and its interrupted version (ILTR). Control stimuli comprising interrupted speech (I) were also included. Speech stimuli consisted of 200 Japanese meaningful sentences. In interrupted stimuli, speech segments were alternated with either silent gaps or pink noise bursts. The noise bursts had a level of − 10, 0 or + 10 dB relative to the speech level. Segment duration varied from 20 to 160 ms for ILTR sentences, but was fixed at 160 ms for I sentences. At segment durations between 40 and 80 ms, severe reductions in intelligibility were observed for ILTR sentences, compared with LTR sentences. A substantial improvement in intelligibility (30–33%) was observed when 40-ms silent gaps in ILTR were replaced with 0- and + 10-dB noise. Noise with a level of − 10 dB had no effect on the intelligibility. These findings show that the combined effects of interruptions and temporal reversal of speech segments on intelligibility are greater than the sum of each individual effect. The results also support the idea that illusory continuity induced by high-level noise bursts improves the intelligibility of ILTR and I sentences.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1928-1934
    Number of pages7
    JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
    Volume83
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 19 2021

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Linguistics and Language
    • Sensory Systems
    • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Phonemic restoration of interrupted locally time-reversed speech: Effects of segment duration and noise levels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this