TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiological responses, rating of perceived exertion, and stride characteristics during walking on dry land and walking in water, both with and without a water current
AU - Masumoto, Kenji
AU - Hamada, Ayako
AU - Tomonaga, Hiro Omi
AU - Kodama, Kana
AU - Hotta, Noboru
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Context: Walking in water has been included in rehabilitation programs. However, there is a dearth of information regarding the influence of a water current on physiological responses, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and stride characteristics of subjects while they walk in water. Objective: To compare physiological responses, RPE, and stride characteristics of subjects walking in water (with and without a current) with those of subjects walking on dry land. Design: Repeated measures. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: 7 male adults (mean age = 21.6 y). Intervention: Subjects walked on a treadmill on dry land and on an underwater treadmill immersed to the level of the xiphoid process. The walking speeds in water were set to be half of that on dry land. Main Outcome Measures: Oxygen consumption (VO2), respiratory-exchange ratio (RER), heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (VE), RPE (for breathing and legs, RPE-Br and RPE-Legs, respectively), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, and stride frequency (SF) were measured. In addition, stride length (SL) was calculated. Results: There was no significant difference in the VO2, RER, HR, VE, RPE-Br, and RPE-Legs while walking in water with a current compared with walking on dry land (P >.05). Furthermore, VO2, RER, HR, VE, RPE-Br, RPE-Legs, SF, and SBP while walking in water were significantly higher with a water current than without (P <.05). Conclusions: These observations suggest that half the speed should be required to work at the similar metabolic costs and RPE while walking in water with a current, compared with walking on dry land. Furthermore, it was suggested that the physiological responses and RPE would be higher while walking in water with a current than without.
AB - Context: Walking in water has been included in rehabilitation programs. However, there is a dearth of information regarding the influence of a water current on physiological responses, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and stride characteristics of subjects while they walk in water. Objective: To compare physiological responses, RPE, and stride characteristics of subjects walking in water (with and without a current) with those of subjects walking on dry land. Design: Repeated measures. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: 7 male adults (mean age = 21.6 y). Intervention: Subjects walked on a treadmill on dry land and on an underwater treadmill immersed to the level of the xiphoid process. The walking speeds in water were set to be half of that on dry land. Main Outcome Measures: Oxygen consumption (VO2), respiratory-exchange ratio (RER), heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (VE), RPE (for breathing and legs, RPE-Br and RPE-Legs, respectively), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, and stride frequency (SF) were measured. In addition, stride length (SL) was calculated. Results: There was no significant difference in the VO2, RER, HR, VE, RPE-Br, and RPE-Legs while walking in water with a current compared with walking on dry land (P >.05). Furthermore, VO2, RER, HR, VE, RPE-Br, RPE-Legs, SF, and SBP while walking in water were significantly higher with a water current than without (P <.05). Conclusions: These observations suggest that half the speed should be required to work at the similar metabolic costs and RPE while walking in water with a current, compared with walking on dry land. Furthermore, it was suggested that the physiological responses and RPE would be higher while walking in water with a current than without.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865080017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865080017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jsr.21.2.175
DO - 10.1123/jsr.21.2.175
M3 - Article
C2 - 22104030
AN - SCOPUS:84865080017
VL - 21
SP - 175
EP - 181
JO - Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
SN - 1056-6716
IS - 2
ER -