Portraying “minorities” in Chinese history textbooks of the 1990s and 2000s: the advance and retreat of ethnocultural inclusivity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

School history textbooks have typically served to reinforce a sense of national identity and national belonging, often through constructing or reinforcing a distinction between the national “self” and foreign “others”. What have often been overlooked in history textbook researches is how ethnic minorities have been portrayed to incorporate them into a multi-ethnic vision of nationality. This paper investigates this issue through comparing the portrayal of minority ethnic groups in two successive editions of China’s most widely used secondary-level history textbooks, published in the 1990s and 2000s. We analyse these changes in the context of broader political and ideological shifts, while also considering the agency of the key editors involved in producing these texts. We find that, rather than exhibiting a steady progression towards greater inclusivity and a more “multi-ethnic” vision of Chineseness, these editions evince a movement away from the latter and back towards a more Han-centric narrative of the national past. We argue that, while shifts in the editorial personnel involved may have contributed to this, a more fundamental factor is the shifting emphasis in ideological or “thought” education in the post-1989 period away from orthodox socialism and towards an increasingly strident and ethnocentric form of patriotism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-208
Number of pages19
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Education
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 3 2019

Fingerprint

textbook
minority
edition
history
patriotism
socialism
nationality
national identity
national minority
ethnic group
personnel
editor
narrative
China
school
education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{174d9bf774484e72ac3ebd4023658c36,
title = "Portraying “minorities” in Chinese history textbooks of the 1990s and 2000s: the advance and retreat of ethnocultural inclusivity",
abstract = "School history textbooks have typically served to reinforce a sense of national identity and national belonging, often through constructing or reinforcing a distinction between the national “self” and foreign “others”. What have often been overlooked in history textbook researches is how ethnic minorities have been portrayed to incorporate them into a multi-ethnic vision of nationality. This paper investigates this issue through comparing the portrayal of minority ethnic groups in two successive editions of China’s most widely used secondary-level history textbooks, published in the 1990s and 2000s. We analyse these changes in the context of broader political and ideological shifts, while also considering the agency of the key editors involved in producing these texts. We find that, rather than exhibiting a steady progression towards greater inclusivity and a more “multi-ethnic” vision of Chineseness, these editions evince a movement away from the latter and back towards a more Han-centric narrative of the national past. We argue that, while shifts in the editorial personnel involved may have contributed to this, a more fundamental factor is the shifting emphasis in ideological or “thought” education in the post-1989 period away from orthodox socialism and towards an increasingly strident and ethnocentric form of patriotism.",
author = "Fei Yan and Edward Vickers",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/02188791.2019.1621800",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "190--208",
journal = "Asia Pacific Journal of Education",
issn = "0218-8791",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Portraying “minorities” in Chinese history textbooks of the 1990s and 2000s

T2 - the advance and retreat of ethnocultural inclusivity

AU - Yan, Fei

AU - Vickers, Edward

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - School history textbooks have typically served to reinforce a sense of national identity and national belonging, often through constructing or reinforcing a distinction between the national “self” and foreign “others”. What have often been overlooked in history textbook researches is how ethnic minorities have been portrayed to incorporate them into a multi-ethnic vision of nationality. This paper investigates this issue through comparing the portrayal of minority ethnic groups in two successive editions of China’s most widely used secondary-level history textbooks, published in the 1990s and 2000s. We analyse these changes in the context of broader political and ideological shifts, while also considering the agency of the key editors involved in producing these texts. We find that, rather than exhibiting a steady progression towards greater inclusivity and a more “multi-ethnic” vision of Chineseness, these editions evince a movement away from the latter and back towards a more Han-centric narrative of the national past. We argue that, while shifts in the editorial personnel involved may have contributed to this, a more fundamental factor is the shifting emphasis in ideological or “thought” education in the post-1989 period away from orthodox socialism and towards an increasingly strident and ethnocentric form of patriotism.

AB - School history textbooks have typically served to reinforce a sense of national identity and national belonging, often through constructing or reinforcing a distinction between the national “self” and foreign “others”. What have often been overlooked in history textbook researches is how ethnic minorities have been portrayed to incorporate them into a multi-ethnic vision of nationality. This paper investigates this issue through comparing the portrayal of minority ethnic groups in two successive editions of China’s most widely used secondary-level history textbooks, published in the 1990s and 2000s. We analyse these changes in the context of broader political and ideological shifts, while also considering the agency of the key editors involved in producing these texts. We find that, rather than exhibiting a steady progression towards greater inclusivity and a more “multi-ethnic” vision of Chineseness, these editions evince a movement away from the latter and back towards a more Han-centric narrative of the national past. We argue that, while shifts in the editorial personnel involved may have contributed to this, a more fundamental factor is the shifting emphasis in ideological or “thought” education in the post-1989 period away from orthodox socialism and towards an increasingly strident and ethnocentric form of patriotism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068779030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068779030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02188791.2019.1621800

DO - 10.1080/02188791.2019.1621800

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068779030

VL - 39

SP - 190

EP - 208

JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Education

JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Education

SN - 0218-8791

IS - 2

ER -