Post-restructuring performance in Japan

Kotaro Inoue, Konari Uchida, Marc Bremer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peek and Rosengren (2005) showed that after the end of the bubble economy era in Japan, regulatory forbearance and perverse incentives allowed Japanese banks to engage extensively in "evergreening". Inoue et al. (2008) also showed that, compared to out-of-court settlements in the United States, agreements on out-of-court restructuring are attained more easily in Japan. However, widespread forbearance by banks and affiliated companies in addressing the needs of distressed firms indicated a serious weakness of banks and affiliated companies in instituting discipline. This is the first empirical study to examine the performance of Japanese firms that experienced out-of-court restructuring in Japan from January 1990, when the bubble economy burst, to March 2005, when the Koizumi Cabinet declared the bad debt problems of major firms to be resolved. Our results show that important biases permitted deeply unprofitable firms to survive in Japan. This finding is similar to research by Hotchkiss (1995), who analyzed post-restructuring performance in the United States. We also find that out-of-court restructurings of troubled firms in Japan were less effective in improving profitability than restructurings under Chapter 11 in the United States. However, we find that restructurings associated with new capital injections and new outside management are more likely to lead to genuine improvement in financial performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)494-508
Number of pages15
JournalPacific Basin Finance Journal
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2010

Fingerprint

Japan
Bubble
Forbearance
Japanese firms
Profitability
Empirical study
Chapter 11
Financial performance
Japanese banks
Injection
Incentives
Debt

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Post-restructuring performance in Japan. / Inoue, Kotaro; Uchida, Konari; Bremer, Marc.

In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 18, No. 5, 01.11.2010, p. 494-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Inoue, Kotaro ; Uchida, Konari ; Bremer, Marc. / Post-restructuring performance in Japan. In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal. 2010 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 494-508.
@article{ec081d8916664ed3b6bb693d95d62cb0,
title = "Post-restructuring performance in Japan",
abstract = "Peek and Rosengren (2005) showed that after the end of the bubble economy era in Japan, regulatory forbearance and perverse incentives allowed Japanese banks to engage extensively in {"}evergreening{"}. Inoue et al. (2008) also showed that, compared to out-of-court settlements in the United States, agreements on out-of-court restructuring are attained more easily in Japan. However, widespread forbearance by banks and affiliated companies in addressing the needs of distressed firms indicated a serious weakness of banks and affiliated companies in instituting discipline. This is the first empirical study to examine the performance of Japanese firms that experienced out-of-court restructuring in Japan from January 1990, when the bubble economy burst, to March 2005, when the Koizumi Cabinet declared the bad debt problems of major firms to be resolved. Our results show that important biases permitted deeply unprofitable firms to survive in Japan. This finding is similar to research by Hotchkiss (1995), who analyzed post-restructuring performance in the United States. We also find that out-of-court restructurings of troubled firms in Japan were less effective in improving profitability than restructurings under Chapter 11 in the United States. However, we find that restructurings associated with new capital injections and new outside management are more likely to lead to genuine improvement in financial performance.",
author = "Kotaro Inoue and Konari Uchida and Marc Bremer",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pacfin.2010.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "494--508",
journal = "Pacific Basin Finance Journal",
issn = "0927-538X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post-restructuring performance in Japan

AU - Inoue, Kotaro

AU - Uchida, Konari

AU - Bremer, Marc

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Peek and Rosengren (2005) showed that after the end of the bubble economy era in Japan, regulatory forbearance and perverse incentives allowed Japanese banks to engage extensively in "evergreening". Inoue et al. (2008) also showed that, compared to out-of-court settlements in the United States, agreements on out-of-court restructuring are attained more easily in Japan. However, widespread forbearance by banks and affiliated companies in addressing the needs of distressed firms indicated a serious weakness of banks and affiliated companies in instituting discipline. This is the first empirical study to examine the performance of Japanese firms that experienced out-of-court restructuring in Japan from January 1990, when the bubble economy burst, to March 2005, when the Koizumi Cabinet declared the bad debt problems of major firms to be resolved. Our results show that important biases permitted deeply unprofitable firms to survive in Japan. This finding is similar to research by Hotchkiss (1995), who analyzed post-restructuring performance in the United States. We also find that out-of-court restructurings of troubled firms in Japan were less effective in improving profitability than restructurings under Chapter 11 in the United States. However, we find that restructurings associated with new capital injections and new outside management are more likely to lead to genuine improvement in financial performance.

AB - Peek and Rosengren (2005) showed that after the end of the bubble economy era in Japan, regulatory forbearance and perverse incentives allowed Japanese banks to engage extensively in "evergreening". Inoue et al. (2008) also showed that, compared to out-of-court settlements in the United States, agreements on out-of-court restructuring are attained more easily in Japan. However, widespread forbearance by banks and affiliated companies in addressing the needs of distressed firms indicated a serious weakness of banks and affiliated companies in instituting discipline. This is the first empirical study to examine the performance of Japanese firms that experienced out-of-court restructuring in Japan from January 1990, when the bubble economy burst, to March 2005, when the Koizumi Cabinet declared the bad debt problems of major firms to be resolved. Our results show that important biases permitted deeply unprofitable firms to survive in Japan. This finding is similar to research by Hotchkiss (1995), who analyzed post-restructuring performance in the United States. We also find that out-of-court restructurings of troubled firms in Japan were less effective in improving profitability than restructurings under Chapter 11 in the United States. However, we find that restructurings associated with new capital injections and new outside management are more likely to lead to genuine improvement in financial performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956339205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956339205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pacfin.2010.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.pacfin.2010.07.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956339205

VL - 18

SP - 494

EP - 508

JO - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

JF - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

SN - 0927-538X

IS - 5

ER -