Postoperative quality of life: Development and validation of the "Dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal surgery" scoring system

Misuzu Nakamura, Yoshinori Hosoya, Koji Umeshita, Masahiko Yano, Yuichiro Doki, Isao Miyashiro, Hideo Dannoue, Masaki Mori, Kentaro Kishi, Alan T. Lefor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although postoperative quality of life is an important outcomes measure, few tools exist to evaluate patients specifically after upper gastrointestinal surgery. The previously developed Dysfunction After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery (DAUGS)32 scoring system has been further refined to include just 20 items. This study was undertaken to validate the refined evaluation tool. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed as a survey, administered to patients after upper gastrointestinal resection at 3 separate institutions. RESULTS: The DAUGS20 score after gastrectomy (n=662) was 27.8 and that after esophagectomy (n= 221) was 36.1, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). The score after distal gastrectomy (n = 282) was 25.4 and that after total gastrectomy (n = 149) was 32.0, showing a significant (p < 0.05) difference. The = coefficient of all items on the DAUGS20 system was 0.904 and Cronbach's = coefficients of the subscales were 0.612 to 0.856, demonstrating high reliability of this evaluation tool. In addition, 7 factors were extracted from the 20 items using definitive factor analysis, to verify validity. CONCLUSIONS: Patient quality of life should be evaluated as an outcomes measure after surgical resection for cancer, just as overall survival is analyzed. The DAUGS20 score is reliable, has validity in the evaluation of postoperative patients, and is a valuable tool to assess patient quality of life after upper gastrointestinal surgery for cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)508-514
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume213
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Gastrectomy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Esophagectomy
Statistical Factor Analysis
Survival
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Postoperative quality of life : Development and validation of the "Dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal surgery" scoring system. / Nakamura, Misuzu; Hosoya, Yoshinori; Umeshita, Koji; Yano, Masahiko; Doki, Yuichiro; Miyashiro, Isao; Dannoue, Hideo; Mori, Masaki; Kishi, Kentaro; Lefor, Alan T.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 213, No. 4, 10.2011, p. 508-514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nakamura, Misuzu ; Hosoya, Yoshinori ; Umeshita, Koji ; Yano, Masahiko ; Doki, Yuichiro ; Miyashiro, Isao ; Dannoue, Hideo ; Mori, Masaki ; Kishi, Kentaro ; Lefor, Alan T. / Postoperative quality of life : Development and validation of the "Dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal surgery" scoring system. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011 ; Vol. 213, No. 4. pp. 508-514.
@article{2b9771505d6a439e98a19a8921a2b44f,
title = "Postoperative quality of life: Development and validation of the {"}Dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal surgery{"} scoring system",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Although postoperative quality of life is an important outcomes measure, few tools exist to evaluate patients specifically after upper gastrointestinal surgery. The previously developed Dysfunction After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery (DAUGS)32 scoring system has been further refined to include just 20 items. This study was undertaken to validate the refined evaluation tool. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed as a survey, administered to patients after upper gastrointestinal resection at 3 separate institutions. RESULTS: The DAUGS20 score after gastrectomy (n=662) was 27.8 and that after esophagectomy (n= 221) was 36.1, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). The score after distal gastrectomy (n = 282) was 25.4 and that after total gastrectomy (n = 149) was 32.0, showing a significant (p < 0.05) difference. The = coefficient of all items on the DAUGS20 system was 0.904 and Cronbach's = coefficients of the subscales were 0.612 to 0.856, demonstrating high reliability of this evaluation tool. In addition, 7 factors were extracted from the 20 items using definitive factor analysis, to verify validity. CONCLUSIONS: Patient quality of life should be evaluated as an outcomes measure after surgical resection for cancer, just as overall survival is analyzed. The DAUGS20 score is reliable, has validity in the evaluation of postoperative patients, and is a valuable tool to assess patient quality of life after upper gastrointestinal surgery for cancer.",
author = "Misuzu Nakamura and Yoshinori Hosoya and Koji Umeshita and Masahiko Yano and Yuichiro Doki and Isao Miyashiro and Hideo Dannoue and Masaki Mori and Kentaro Kishi and Lefor, {Alan T.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "213",
pages = "508--514",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postoperative quality of life

T2 - Development and validation of the "Dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal surgery" scoring system

AU - Nakamura, Misuzu

AU - Hosoya, Yoshinori

AU - Umeshita, Koji

AU - Yano, Masahiko

AU - Doki, Yuichiro

AU - Miyashiro, Isao

AU - Dannoue, Hideo

AU - Mori, Masaki

AU - Kishi, Kentaro

AU - Lefor, Alan T.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Although postoperative quality of life is an important outcomes measure, few tools exist to evaluate patients specifically after upper gastrointestinal surgery. The previously developed Dysfunction After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery (DAUGS)32 scoring system has been further refined to include just 20 items. This study was undertaken to validate the refined evaluation tool. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed as a survey, administered to patients after upper gastrointestinal resection at 3 separate institutions. RESULTS: The DAUGS20 score after gastrectomy (n=662) was 27.8 and that after esophagectomy (n= 221) was 36.1, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). The score after distal gastrectomy (n = 282) was 25.4 and that after total gastrectomy (n = 149) was 32.0, showing a significant (p < 0.05) difference. The = coefficient of all items on the DAUGS20 system was 0.904 and Cronbach's = coefficients of the subscales were 0.612 to 0.856, demonstrating high reliability of this evaluation tool. In addition, 7 factors were extracted from the 20 items using definitive factor analysis, to verify validity. CONCLUSIONS: Patient quality of life should be evaluated as an outcomes measure after surgical resection for cancer, just as overall survival is analyzed. The DAUGS20 score is reliable, has validity in the evaluation of postoperative patients, and is a valuable tool to assess patient quality of life after upper gastrointestinal surgery for cancer.

AB - BACKGROUND: Although postoperative quality of life is an important outcomes measure, few tools exist to evaluate patients specifically after upper gastrointestinal surgery. The previously developed Dysfunction After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery (DAUGS)32 scoring system has been further refined to include just 20 items. This study was undertaken to validate the refined evaluation tool. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed as a survey, administered to patients after upper gastrointestinal resection at 3 separate institutions. RESULTS: The DAUGS20 score after gastrectomy (n=662) was 27.8 and that after esophagectomy (n= 221) was 36.1, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). The score after distal gastrectomy (n = 282) was 25.4 and that after total gastrectomy (n = 149) was 32.0, showing a significant (p < 0.05) difference. The = coefficient of all items on the DAUGS20 system was 0.904 and Cronbach's = coefficients of the subscales were 0.612 to 0.856, demonstrating high reliability of this evaluation tool. In addition, 7 factors were extracted from the 20 items using definitive factor analysis, to verify validity. CONCLUSIONS: Patient quality of life should be evaluated as an outcomes measure after surgical resection for cancer, just as overall survival is analyzed. The DAUGS20 score is reliable, has validity in the evaluation of postoperative patients, and is a valuable tool to assess patient quality of life after upper gastrointestinal surgery for cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81555197129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81555197129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 21862356

AN - SCOPUS:81555197129

VL - 213

SP - 508

EP - 514

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 4

ER -