TY - JOUR
T1 - Precise aftershock distribution of the 2004 Mid-Niigata prefecture earthquake-Implication for a very weak region in the lower crust
AU - Iio, Yoshihisa
AU - Shibutani, Takuo
AU - Matsumoto, Satoshi
AU - Katao, Hiroshi
AU - Matsushima, Takeshi
AU - Ohmi, Shiro
AU - Takeuchi, Fumiaki
AU - Uehira, Kenji
AU - Nishigami, Kinya
AU - Miyazawa, Masatoshi
AU - Enescu, Bogdan
AU - Hirose, Issei
AU - Kano, Yasuyuki
AU - Kohno, Yuhki
AU - Tatsumi, Ken'ichi
AU - Ueno, Tomotake
AU - Wada, Hiroo
AU - Yukutake, Yohei
PY - 2009/2/1
Y1 - 2009/2/1
N2 - The 2004 Mid-Niigata prefecture Earthquake (Mjma 6.8) occurred in the region of large strain rates (>0.1 ppm/y contraction) in the intraplate region in Japan. The mainshock was followed by four major aftershocks with Mjma >= 6.0. The hypocenters of the mainshock and two large aftershocks that occurred in the central part of the aftershock region were located near the lower limit of the earthquake distribution, while hypocenters of the other two aftershocks near both ends, are located near its upper limit. Furthermore, the fault planes of the latter two aftershocks were confined within the upper half of the upper crust. Also, the lower limit of the aftershock distribution is deepest in the central part and becomes shallower toward the NNE and SSW ends. These data can be explained by the hypothesis that a localized stress concentration occurred near the bottom of the seismogenic region only in the central part. The stress concentration may be generated by the deformation in the very weak region of low strength in the lower crust beneath the central part of the aftershock region.
AB - The 2004 Mid-Niigata prefecture Earthquake (Mjma 6.8) occurred in the region of large strain rates (>0.1 ppm/y contraction) in the intraplate region in Japan. The mainshock was followed by four major aftershocks with Mjma >= 6.0. The hypocenters of the mainshock and two large aftershocks that occurred in the central part of the aftershock region were located near the lower limit of the earthquake distribution, while hypocenters of the other two aftershocks near both ends, are located near its upper limit. Furthermore, the fault planes of the latter two aftershocks were confined within the upper half of the upper crust. Also, the lower limit of the aftershock distribution is deepest in the central part and becomes shallower toward the NNE and SSW ends. These data can be explained by the hypothesis that a localized stress concentration occurred near the bottom of the seismogenic region only in the central part. The stress concentration may be generated by the deformation in the very weak region of low strength in the lower crust beneath the central part of the aftershock region.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57749183858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57749183858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.10.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:57749183858
SN - 0031-9201
VL - 172
SP - 345
EP - 352
JO - Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
JF - Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
IS - 3-4
ER -