TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary progressive versus relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in Japanese patients
T2 - A combined clinical, magnetic resonance imaging and multimodality evoked potential study
AU - Kira, Jun ichi
AU - Tobimatsu, Shozo
AU - Goto, Ikuo
AU - Hasuo, Kanehiro
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank Dr. Brian QTu. innfor criticalc om-mentso n the manuscript. This wowraks supportedin part by grants from the Slow Virus InfectionR esearchC ommitteean d by a grant from the Ministry of EducationS, ciencea ndC ultureo f Japan.
PY - 1993/7
Y1 - 1993/7
N2 - Thirty-five Japanese patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and 11 Japanese patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) were compared by a combined clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multimodality evoked potential (MEP) study. Patients with PPMS showed a more common occurrence of gait disturbance as the initial symptoms as well as a more common occurrence of cerebellar symptomatology than did those with RRMS, while spinal cord symptomatology was frequently observed in both conditions. On brain MRI, patients with PPMS had 3 times more lesions than did those with RRMS (P < 0.001, x2-test). The percentage of infratentorial lesions was also significantly higher in PPMS than in RRMS on MRI. Moreover, we found a significantly higher frequency of abnormal records in visual, brainstem auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in PPMS than in RRMS. Interestingly, clinically unexpected abnormalities were significantly more common in PPMS than in RRMS throughout all modalities of MEPs. Thus, in Eastern MS, there exists a distinction between PPMS and RRMS in the MRI and MEP findings as well as in the clinical findings. Our results therefore suggest that there may be two distinct subtypes in MS.
AB - Thirty-five Japanese patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and 11 Japanese patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) were compared by a combined clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multimodality evoked potential (MEP) study. Patients with PPMS showed a more common occurrence of gait disturbance as the initial symptoms as well as a more common occurrence of cerebellar symptomatology than did those with RRMS, while spinal cord symptomatology was frequently observed in both conditions. On brain MRI, patients with PPMS had 3 times more lesions than did those with RRMS (P < 0.001, x2-test). The percentage of infratentorial lesions was also significantly higher in PPMS than in RRMS on MRI. Moreover, we found a significantly higher frequency of abnormal records in visual, brainstem auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in PPMS than in RRMS. Interestingly, clinically unexpected abnormalities were significantly more common in PPMS than in RRMS throughout all modalities of MEPs. Thus, in Eastern MS, there exists a distinction between PPMS and RRMS in the MRI and MEP findings as well as in the clinical findings. Our results therefore suggest that there may be two distinct subtypes in MS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027325786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027325786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0022-510X(93)90171-T
DO - 10.1016/0022-510X(93)90171-T
M3 - Article
C2 - 8410054
AN - SCOPUS:0027325786
SN - 0022-510X
VL - 117
SP - 179
EP - 185
JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences
JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences
IS - 1-2
ER -