Priority maps for protecting the habitats of threatened freshwater fishes in urban areas: a case study of five rivers in the Fukuoka Plain, northern Kyushu Island, Japan

Norio Onikura, Jun Nakajima, Ryutei Inui, Jun Kaneto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selecting candidate areas to protect the habitats of threatened freshwater fish species is a major challenge in urban areas. Therefore, we conducted a case study using a Marxan analysis based on fish fauna and land use data of five rivers flowing in the Fukuoka Plain, northern Kyushu Island, Japan, to construct priority maps to protect threatened freshwater fishes in the urbanized plain. We organized threatened fish fauna and land use data in the fourth-mesh scale, drawn as a 500-m square, resulting in 147 meshes with fauna and land use data. We assessed two cases—meshes were either analyzed as having the same cost (case 1) or having cost sizes classified into four classes based on cluster analysis of land use data (case 2). We divided the threatened species into those from either stream fish or floodplain fish and analyzed them separately. When meshes with high priority in both case 1 and case 2 were defined as primacy meshes for habitat protection, 10 and 28 meshes were identified in the stream and floodplain fish, respectively. Of the primacy meshes, 40 % for the stream fish and 54 % for the floodplain fish were distributed in urbanized areas, indicating that habitat protection was necessary in several urbanized areas on the plain. Meshes with low priority in case 1 and with high priority in case 2 were defined as the second most important meshes for habitat protection. The number of second most important meshes for the floodplain fish was smaller than that for the stream fish; therefore, the floodplain fish required habitat protection in urbanized areas to a greater extent than the stream fish.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-355
Number of pages9
JournalIchthyological Research
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

freshwater fish
urban areas
urban area
Japan
case studies
rivers
habitat
fish
habitats
river
floodplains
habitat conservation
floodplain
land use
fauna
plain
threatened species
cluster analysis
cost

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Priority maps for protecting the habitats of threatened freshwater fishes in urban areas : a case study of five rivers in the Fukuoka Plain, northern Kyushu Island, Japan. / Onikura, Norio; Nakajima, Jun; Inui, Ryutei; Kaneto, Jun.

In: Ichthyological Research, Vol. 63, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 347-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8dd517effbfc407da53bd69e1d0b0872,
title = "Priority maps for protecting the habitats of threatened freshwater fishes in urban areas: a case study of five rivers in the Fukuoka Plain, northern Kyushu Island, Japan",
abstract = "Selecting candidate areas to protect the habitats of threatened freshwater fish species is a major challenge in urban areas. Therefore, we conducted a case study using a Marxan analysis based on fish fauna and land use data of five rivers flowing in the Fukuoka Plain, northern Kyushu Island, Japan, to construct priority maps to protect threatened freshwater fishes in the urbanized plain. We organized threatened fish fauna and land use data in the fourth-mesh scale, drawn as a 500-m square, resulting in 147 meshes with fauna and land use data. We assessed two cases—meshes were either analyzed as having the same cost (case 1) or having cost sizes classified into four classes based on cluster analysis of land use data (case 2). We divided the threatened species into those from either stream fish or floodplain fish and analyzed them separately. When meshes with high priority in both case 1 and case 2 were defined as primacy meshes for habitat protection, 10 and 28 meshes were identified in the stream and floodplain fish, respectively. Of the primacy meshes, 40 {\%} for the stream fish and 54 {\%} for the floodplain fish were distributed in urbanized areas, indicating that habitat protection was necessary in several urbanized areas on the plain. Meshes with low priority in case 1 and with high priority in case 2 were defined as the second most important meshes for habitat protection. The number of second most important meshes for the floodplain fish was smaller than that for the stream fish; therefore, the floodplain fish required habitat protection in urbanized areas to a greater extent than the stream fish.",
author = "Norio Onikura and Jun Nakajima and Ryutei Inui and Jun Kaneto",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10228-015-0504-5",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "347--355",
journal = "Ichthyological Research",
issn = "1341-8998",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Priority maps for protecting the habitats of threatened freshwater fishes in urban areas

T2 - a case study of five rivers in the Fukuoka Plain, northern Kyushu Island, Japan

AU - Onikura, Norio

AU - Nakajima, Jun

AU - Inui, Ryutei

AU - Kaneto, Jun

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Selecting candidate areas to protect the habitats of threatened freshwater fish species is a major challenge in urban areas. Therefore, we conducted a case study using a Marxan analysis based on fish fauna and land use data of five rivers flowing in the Fukuoka Plain, northern Kyushu Island, Japan, to construct priority maps to protect threatened freshwater fishes in the urbanized plain. We organized threatened fish fauna and land use data in the fourth-mesh scale, drawn as a 500-m square, resulting in 147 meshes with fauna and land use data. We assessed two cases—meshes were either analyzed as having the same cost (case 1) or having cost sizes classified into four classes based on cluster analysis of land use data (case 2). We divided the threatened species into those from either stream fish or floodplain fish and analyzed them separately. When meshes with high priority in both case 1 and case 2 were defined as primacy meshes for habitat protection, 10 and 28 meshes were identified in the stream and floodplain fish, respectively. Of the primacy meshes, 40 % for the stream fish and 54 % for the floodplain fish were distributed in urbanized areas, indicating that habitat protection was necessary in several urbanized areas on the plain. Meshes with low priority in case 1 and with high priority in case 2 were defined as the second most important meshes for habitat protection. The number of second most important meshes for the floodplain fish was smaller than that for the stream fish; therefore, the floodplain fish required habitat protection in urbanized areas to a greater extent than the stream fish.

AB - Selecting candidate areas to protect the habitats of threatened freshwater fish species is a major challenge in urban areas. Therefore, we conducted a case study using a Marxan analysis based on fish fauna and land use data of five rivers flowing in the Fukuoka Plain, northern Kyushu Island, Japan, to construct priority maps to protect threatened freshwater fishes in the urbanized plain. We organized threatened fish fauna and land use data in the fourth-mesh scale, drawn as a 500-m square, resulting in 147 meshes with fauna and land use data. We assessed two cases—meshes were either analyzed as having the same cost (case 1) or having cost sizes classified into four classes based on cluster analysis of land use data (case 2). We divided the threatened species into those from either stream fish or floodplain fish and analyzed them separately. When meshes with high priority in both case 1 and case 2 were defined as primacy meshes for habitat protection, 10 and 28 meshes were identified in the stream and floodplain fish, respectively. Of the primacy meshes, 40 % for the stream fish and 54 % for the floodplain fish were distributed in urbanized areas, indicating that habitat protection was necessary in several urbanized areas on the plain. Meshes with low priority in case 1 and with high priority in case 2 were defined as the second most important meshes for habitat protection. The number of second most important meshes for the floodplain fish was smaller than that for the stream fish; therefore, the floodplain fish required habitat protection in urbanized areas to a greater extent than the stream fish.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951800718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951800718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10228-015-0504-5

DO - 10.1007/s10228-015-0504-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84951800718

VL - 63

SP - 347

EP - 355

JO - Ichthyological Research

JF - Ichthyological Research

SN - 1341-8998

IS - 3

ER -