Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy

Norifumi Harimoto, Ken Shirabe, Tomoyuki Abe, Takafumi Yukaya, Eiji Tsujita, Tomonobu Gion, Kiyoshi Kajiyama, Takashi Nagaie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether absorbable sutures or non-absorbable sutures are better in preventing surgical site infection (SSI), in this paper we discuss the results of a randomized clinical trial which examined the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. METHODS: All hepatic resections performed from January 2007 to November 2008 at the Department of Surgery at Iizuka Hospital in Japan were included in this study. There were 125 patients randomly assigned to an absorbable sutures (Vicryl) group or non-absorbable sutures (Silk) group. RESULTS: SSI was observed in 13.6% (17/125) patients participating in this study, 11.3% in the Vicryl group and 15.8% in the Silk group. Incisional SSI including superficial and deep SSI, was observed in 8% of the Vicryl group and 9.5% of the Silk group. Organ/ space SSI was observed in 3.2% of the Vicryl group and 6.0% of the Silk group. There were no significant differences, but among the patients with SSI, the period for recovery was significantly shorter for the Vicryl group compared to the Silk group. CONCLUSION: The incidence of SSI in patients receiving absorbable sutures and silk sutures is not significantly different in this randomized controlled study; however, the period for recovery in patients with SSI was significantly shorter for absorbable sutures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2338-2342
Number of pages5
JournalWorld Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume17
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 14 2011

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Hepatectomy
Sutures
Silk
Polyglactin 910
Randomized Controlled Trials
Japan
Liver
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Harimoto, N., Shirabe, K., Abe, T., Yukaya, T., Tsujita, E., Gion, T., ... Nagaie, T. (2011). Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 17(18), 2338-2342. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i18.2338

Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. / Harimoto, Norifumi; Shirabe, Ken; Abe, Tomoyuki; Yukaya, Takafumi; Tsujita, Eiji; Gion, Tomonobu; Kajiyama, Kiyoshi; Nagaie, Takashi.

In: World Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 17, No. 18, 14.05.2011, p. 2338-2342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harimoto, N, Shirabe, K, Abe, T, Yukaya, T, Tsujita, E, Gion, T, Kajiyama, K & Nagaie, T 2011, 'Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy', World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 18, pp. 2338-2342. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i18.2338
Harimoto, Norifumi ; Shirabe, Ken ; Abe, Tomoyuki ; Yukaya, Takafumi ; Tsujita, Eiji ; Gion, Tomonobu ; Kajiyama, Kiyoshi ; Nagaie, Takashi. / Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. In: World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011 ; Vol. 17, No. 18. pp. 2338-2342.
@article{c3c6d90edd474d12981088b051a31f56,
title = "Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy",
abstract = "AIM: To determine whether absorbable sutures or non-absorbable sutures are better in preventing surgical site infection (SSI), in this paper we discuss the results of a randomized clinical trial which examined the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. METHODS: All hepatic resections performed from January 2007 to November 2008 at the Department of Surgery at Iizuka Hospital in Japan were included in this study. There were 125 patients randomly assigned to an absorbable sutures (Vicryl) group or non-absorbable sutures (Silk) group. RESULTS: SSI was observed in 13.6{\%} (17/125) patients participating in this study, 11.3{\%} in the Vicryl group and 15.8{\%} in the Silk group. Incisional SSI including superficial and deep SSI, was observed in 8{\%} of the Vicryl group and 9.5{\%} of the Silk group. Organ/ space SSI was observed in 3.2{\%} of the Vicryl group and 6.0{\%} of the Silk group. There were no significant differences, but among the patients with SSI, the period for recovery was significantly shorter for the Vicryl group compared to the Silk group. CONCLUSION: The incidence of SSI in patients receiving absorbable sutures and silk sutures is not significantly different in this randomized controlled study; however, the period for recovery in patients with SSI was significantly shorter for absorbable sutures.",
author = "Norifumi Harimoto and Ken Shirabe and Tomoyuki Abe and Takafumi Yukaya and Eiji Tsujita and Tomonobu Gion and Kiyoshi Kajiyama and Takashi Nagaie",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "14",
doi = "10.3748/wjg.v17.i18.2338",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "2338--2342",
journal = "World Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "1007-9327",
publisher = "WJG Press",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy

AU - Harimoto, Norifumi

AU - Shirabe, Ken

AU - Abe, Tomoyuki

AU - Yukaya, Takafumi

AU - Tsujita, Eiji

AU - Gion, Tomonobu

AU - Kajiyama, Kiyoshi

AU - Nagaie, Takashi

PY - 2011/5/14

Y1 - 2011/5/14

N2 - AIM: To determine whether absorbable sutures or non-absorbable sutures are better in preventing surgical site infection (SSI), in this paper we discuss the results of a randomized clinical trial which examined the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. METHODS: All hepatic resections performed from January 2007 to November 2008 at the Department of Surgery at Iizuka Hospital in Japan were included in this study. There were 125 patients randomly assigned to an absorbable sutures (Vicryl) group or non-absorbable sutures (Silk) group. RESULTS: SSI was observed in 13.6% (17/125) patients participating in this study, 11.3% in the Vicryl group and 15.8% in the Silk group. Incisional SSI including superficial and deep SSI, was observed in 8% of the Vicryl group and 9.5% of the Silk group. Organ/ space SSI was observed in 3.2% of the Vicryl group and 6.0% of the Silk group. There were no significant differences, but among the patients with SSI, the period for recovery was significantly shorter for the Vicryl group compared to the Silk group. CONCLUSION: The incidence of SSI in patients receiving absorbable sutures and silk sutures is not significantly different in this randomized controlled study; however, the period for recovery in patients with SSI was significantly shorter for absorbable sutures.

AB - AIM: To determine whether absorbable sutures or non-absorbable sutures are better in preventing surgical site infection (SSI), in this paper we discuss the results of a randomized clinical trial which examined the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. METHODS: All hepatic resections performed from January 2007 to November 2008 at the Department of Surgery at Iizuka Hospital in Japan were included in this study. There were 125 patients randomly assigned to an absorbable sutures (Vicryl) group or non-absorbable sutures (Silk) group. RESULTS: SSI was observed in 13.6% (17/125) patients participating in this study, 11.3% in the Vicryl group and 15.8% in the Silk group. Incisional SSI including superficial and deep SSI, was observed in 8% of the Vicryl group and 9.5% of the Silk group. Organ/ space SSI was observed in 3.2% of the Vicryl group and 6.0% of the Silk group. There were no significant differences, but among the patients with SSI, the period for recovery was significantly shorter for the Vicryl group compared to the Silk group. CONCLUSION: The incidence of SSI in patients receiving absorbable sutures and silk sutures is not significantly different in this randomized controlled study; however, the period for recovery in patients with SSI was significantly shorter for absorbable sutures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957867625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957867625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3748/wjg.v17.i18.2338

DO - 10.3748/wjg.v17.i18.2338

M3 - Article

C2 - 21633600

AN - SCOPUS:79957867625

VL - 17

SP - 2338

EP - 2342

JO - World Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - World Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 1007-9327

IS - 18

ER -