Public and private mitigation for natural disasters in Japan

Kazuyuki Iwata, Yutaka Ito, Shunsuke Managi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An increasing number of studies analyze the relationship between natural disaster damage and income levels, but they do not consider the distinction between public and private disaster mitigation. This paper empirically distinguishes these two types of mitigation using Japanese prefectural panel data from 1975 to 2007. Our results show that public mitigation rather than private mitigation has contributed to mitigating the total damage resulting from natural disasters. Our estimation of cost-benefit ratios for each prefecture confirms that the mitigation efforts of urban prefectures are less effective than those of rural prefectures in focusing on both large and frequent/small disasters. Hence, urban prefectures need to reassess their public mitigation measures. Furthermore, to lessen the damage resulting from extreme catastrophes, policy makers are required to invest in improved mitigation infrastructures when faced with a high probability of disasters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-50
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

natural disaster
Disasters
disaster
damages
mitigation
Japan
damage
infrastructure
income
panel data
costs
public
Costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Safety Research
  • Geology

Cite this

Public and private mitigation for natural disasters in Japan. / Iwata, Kazuyuki; Ito, Yutaka; Managi, Shunsuke.

In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 7, 01.03.2014, p. 39-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0bbeb326c2440489686813e7fdb8d94,
title = "Public and private mitigation for natural disasters in Japan",
abstract = "An increasing number of studies analyze the relationship between natural disaster damage and income levels, but they do not consider the distinction between public and private disaster mitigation. This paper empirically distinguishes these two types of mitigation using Japanese prefectural panel data from 1975 to 2007. Our results show that public mitigation rather than private mitigation has contributed to mitigating the total damage resulting from natural disasters. Our estimation of cost-benefit ratios for each prefecture confirms that the mitigation efforts of urban prefectures are less effective than those of rural prefectures in focusing on both large and frequent/small disasters. Hence, urban prefectures need to reassess their public mitigation measures. Furthermore, to lessen the damage resulting from extreme catastrophes, policy makers are required to invest in improved mitigation infrastructures when faced with a high probability of disasters.",
author = "Kazuyuki Iwata and Yutaka Ito and Shunsuke Managi",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.005",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "39--50",
journal = "International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction",
issn = "2212-4209",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public and private mitigation for natural disasters in Japan

AU - Iwata, Kazuyuki

AU - Ito, Yutaka

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - An increasing number of studies analyze the relationship between natural disaster damage and income levels, but they do not consider the distinction between public and private disaster mitigation. This paper empirically distinguishes these two types of mitigation using Japanese prefectural panel data from 1975 to 2007. Our results show that public mitigation rather than private mitigation has contributed to mitigating the total damage resulting from natural disasters. Our estimation of cost-benefit ratios for each prefecture confirms that the mitigation efforts of urban prefectures are less effective than those of rural prefectures in focusing on both large and frequent/small disasters. Hence, urban prefectures need to reassess their public mitigation measures. Furthermore, to lessen the damage resulting from extreme catastrophes, policy makers are required to invest in improved mitigation infrastructures when faced with a high probability of disasters.

AB - An increasing number of studies analyze the relationship between natural disaster damage and income levels, but they do not consider the distinction between public and private disaster mitigation. This paper empirically distinguishes these two types of mitigation using Japanese prefectural panel data from 1975 to 2007. Our results show that public mitigation rather than private mitigation has contributed to mitigating the total damage resulting from natural disasters. Our estimation of cost-benefit ratios for each prefecture confirms that the mitigation efforts of urban prefectures are less effective than those of rural prefectures in focusing on both large and frequent/small disasters. Hence, urban prefectures need to reassess their public mitigation measures. Furthermore, to lessen the damage resulting from extreme catastrophes, policy makers are required to invest in improved mitigation infrastructures when faced with a high probability of disasters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893368356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893368356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893368356

VL - 7

SP - 39

EP - 50

JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

SN - 2212-4209

ER -