Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators

Kikuko Shoyama, Shunsuke Managi, Yoshiki Yamagata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Potential conflicts exist between biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation as trade-offs in multiple-use land management. This study aims to evaluate public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation policy considering respondents' uncertainty on their choice. We conducted a choice experiment using land-use scenarios in the rural Kushiro watershed in northern Japan. The results showed that the public strongly wish to avoid the extinction of endangered species in preference to climate-change mitigation in the form of carbon sequestration by increasing the area of managed forest. Knowledge of the site and the respondents' awareness of the personal benefits associated with supporting and regulating services had a positive effect on their preference for conservation plans. Thus, decision-makers should be careful about how they provide ecological information for informed choices concerning ecosystem services tradeoffs. Suggesting targets with explicit indicators will affect public preferences, as well as the willingness of the public to pay for such measures. Furthermore, the elicited-choice probabilities approach is useful for revealing the distribution of relative preferences for incomplete scenarios, thus verifying the effectiveness of indicators introduced in the experiment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-293
Number of pages12
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume34
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
ecosystem services
biodiversity
climate change
conservation
experiment
multiple land use
land use planning
carbon sequestration
endangered species
land use
multiple use
scenario
extinction
uncertainty
conflict potential
land management
Japan
watershed
decision maker

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation : A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators. / Shoyama, Kikuko; Managi, Shunsuke; Yamagata, Yoshiki.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 34, 01.09.2013, p. 282-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89c4f6c817df4bbabb1b6077b8b1db32,
title = "Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators",
abstract = "Potential conflicts exist between biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation as trade-offs in multiple-use land management. This study aims to evaluate public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation policy considering respondents' uncertainty on their choice. We conducted a choice experiment using land-use scenarios in the rural Kushiro watershed in northern Japan. The results showed that the public strongly wish to avoid the extinction of endangered species in preference to climate-change mitigation in the form of carbon sequestration by increasing the area of managed forest. Knowledge of the site and the respondents' awareness of the personal benefits associated with supporting and regulating services had a positive effect on their preference for conservation plans. Thus, decision-makers should be careful about how they provide ecological information for informed choices concerning ecosystem services tradeoffs. Suggesting targets with explicit indicators will affect public preferences, as well as the willingness of the public to pay for such measures. Furthermore, the elicited-choice probabilities approach is useful for revealing the distribution of relative preferences for incomplete scenarios, thus verifying the effectiveness of indicators introduced in the experiment.",
author = "Kikuko Shoyama and Shunsuke Managi and Yoshiki Yamagata",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.003",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "282--293",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation

T2 - A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators

AU - Shoyama, Kikuko

AU - Managi, Shunsuke

AU - Yamagata, Yoshiki

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Potential conflicts exist between biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation as trade-offs in multiple-use land management. This study aims to evaluate public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation policy considering respondents' uncertainty on their choice. We conducted a choice experiment using land-use scenarios in the rural Kushiro watershed in northern Japan. The results showed that the public strongly wish to avoid the extinction of endangered species in preference to climate-change mitigation in the form of carbon sequestration by increasing the area of managed forest. Knowledge of the site and the respondents' awareness of the personal benefits associated with supporting and regulating services had a positive effect on their preference for conservation plans. Thus, decision-makers should be careful about how they provide ecological information for informed choices concerning ecosystem services tradeoffs. Suggesting targets with explicit indicators will affect public preferences, as well as the willingness of the public to pay for such measures. Furthermore, the elicited-choice probabilities approach is useful for revealing the distribution of relative preferences for incomplete scenarios, thus verifying the effectiveness of indicators introduced in the experiment.

AB - Potential conflicts exist between biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation as trade-offs in multiple-use land management. This study aims to evaluate public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation policy considering respondents' uncertainty on their choice. We conducted a choice experiment using land-use scenarios in the rural Kushiro watershed in northern Japan. The results showed that the public strongly wish to avoid the extinction of endangered species in preference to climate-change mitigation in the form of carbon sequestration by increasing the area of managed forest. Knowledge of the site and the respondents' awareness of the personal benefits associated with supporting and regulating services had a positive effect on their preference for conservation plans. Thus, decision-makers should be careful about how they provide ecological information for informed choices concerning ecosystem services tradeoffs. Suggesting targets with explicit indicators will affect public preferences, as well as the willingness of the public to pay for such measures. Furthermore, the elicited-choice probabilities approach is useful for revealing the distribution of relative preferences for incomplete scenarios, thus verifying the effectiveness of indicators introduced in the experiment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877333161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877333161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877333161

VL - 34

SP - 282

EP - 293

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -