Quality Management Program of Stroke Rehabilitation Using Adherence to Guidelines: A Nationwide Initiative in Japan

S. Miura, R. Miyata, S. Matsumoto, Takahiro Higashi, Yoshinobu Wakisaka, Tetsuro Ago, Takanari Kitazono, Koji Iihara, Megumi Shimodozono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Aim: In recent years, interest in the quality of medical care has rapidly increased worldwide. However, quality indicators that contribute to establishing standard treatment in stroke medicine, especially rehabilitation, are not well-developed in Japan. Japan has established Kaifukuki (convalescent) rehabilitation wards, and the development of quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation in the convalescent phase is an urgent issue. Methods: We first reviewed the literature regarding quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation. Next, we extracted candidate indicators from identified reports and guidelines and surveyed educational hospitals certified by the Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. On the basis of the survey results, we reevaluated the suitability of the proposed indicators in discussions with an expert panel. Results: The questionnaire survey highlighted several important items that revealed there is room for improvement in adherence. For stroke rehabilitation in the convalescent phase, we adopted 15 indicators that were feasible as indicators to be used for comparisons between facilities, based on scoring by and opinions of the expert panel. These indicators measured structure (2 indicators), process (5 indicators), and outcome (8 indicators). Conclusion: This is the first study to establish quality indicators to standardize stroke rehabilitation in Japan. We developed this set of 15 indicators using an evidence-based approach. However, many tasks remain for continuous quality improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2434-2441
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Guideline Adherence
Japan
Rehabilitation
Medicine
Quality of Health Care
Expert Testimony
Quality Improvement
Stroke
Guidelines
Stroke Rehabilitation
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Quality Management Program of Stroke Rehabilitation Using Adherence to Guidelines : A Nationwide Initiative in Japan. / Miura, S.; Miyata, R.; Matsumoto, S.; Higashi, Takahiro; Wakisaka, Yoshinobu; Ago, Tetsuro; Kitazono, Takanari; Iihara, Koji; Shimodozono, Megumi.

In: Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 28, No. 9, 01.09.2019, p. 2434-2441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d8fa8870a95d4a7ebe105d30d032952c,
title = "Quality Management Program of Stroke Rehabilitation Using Adherence to Guidelines: A Nationwide Initiative in Japan",
abstract = "Background and Aim: In recent years, interest in the quality of medical care has rapidly increased worldwide. However, quality indicators that contribute to establishing standard treatment in stroke medicine, especially rehabilitation, are not well-developed in Japan. Japan has established Kaifukuki (convalescent) rehabilitation wards, and the development of quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation in the convalescent phase is an urgent issue. Methods: We first reviewed the literature regarding quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation. Next, we extracted candidate indicators from identified reports and guidelines and surveyed educational hospitals certified by the Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. On the basis of the survey results, we reevaluated the suitability of the proposed indicators in discussions with an expert panel. Results: The questionnaire survey highlighted several important items that revealed there is room for improvement in adherence. For stroke rehabilitation in the convalescent phase, we adopted 15 indicators that were feasible as indicators to be used for comparisons between facilities, based on scoring by and opinions of the expert panel. These indicators measured structure (2 indicators), process (5 indicators), and outcome (8 indicators). Conclusion: This is the first study to establish quality indicators to standardize stroke rehabilitation in Japan. We developed this set of 15 indicators using an evidence-based approach. However, many tasks remain for continuous quality improvement.",
author = "S. Miura and R. Miyata and S. Matsumoto and Takahiro Higashi and Yoshinobu Wakisaka and Tetsuro Ago and Takanari Kitazono and Koji Iihara and Megumi Shimodozono",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.028",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "2434--2441",
journal = "Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases",
issn = "1052-3057",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality Management Program of Stroke Rehabilitation Using Adherence to Guidelines

T2 - A Nationwide Initiative in Japan

AU - Miura, S.

AU - Miyata, R.

AU - Matsumoto, S.

AU - Higashi, Takahiro

AU - Wakisaka, Yoshinobu

AU - Ago, Tetsuro

AU - Kitazono, Takanari

AU - Iihara, Koji

AU - Shimodozono, Megumi

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Background and Aim: In recent years, interest in the quality of medical care has rapidly increased worldwide. However, quality indicators that contribute to establishing standard treatment in stroke medicine, especially rehabilitation, are not well-developed in Japan. Japan has established Kaifukuki (convalescent) rehabilitation wards, and the development of quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation in the convalescent phase is an urgent issue. Methods: We first reviewed the literature regarding quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation. Next, we extracted candidate indicators from identified reports and guidelines and surveyed educational hospitals certified by the Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. On the basis of the survey results, we reevaluated the suitability of the proposed indicators in discussions with an expert panel. Results: The questionnaire survey highlighted several important items that revealed there is room for improvement in adherence. For stroke rehabilitation in the convalescent phase, we adopted 15 indicators that were feasible as indicators to be used for comparisons between facilities, based on scoring by and opinions of the expert panel. These indicators measured structure (2 indicators), process (5 indicators), and outcome (8 indicators). Conclusion: This is the first study to establish quality indicators to standardize stroke rehabilitation in Japan. We developed this set of 15 indicators using an evidence-based approach. However, many tasks remain for continuous quality improvement.

AB - Background and Aim: In recent years, interest in the quality of medical care has rapidly increased worldwide. However, quality indicators that contribute to establishing standard treatment in stroke medicine, especially rehabilitation, are not well-developed in Japan. Japan has established Kaifukuki (convalescent) rehabilitation wards, and the development of quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation in the convalescent phase is an urgent issue. Methods: We first reviewed the literature regarding quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation. Next, we extracted candidate indicators from identified reports and guidelines and surveyed educational hospitals certified by the Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. On the basis of the survey results, we reevaluated the suitability of the proposed indicators in discussions with an expert panel. Results: The questionnaire survey highlighted several important items that revealed there is room for improvement in adherence. For stroke rehabilitation in the convalescent phase, we adopted 15 indicators that were feasible as indicators to be used for comparisons between facilities, based on scoring by and opinions of the expert panel. These indicators measured structure (2 indicators), process (5 indicators), and outcome (8 indicators). Conclusion: This is the first study to establish quality indicators to standardize stroke rehabilitation in Japan. We developed this set of 15 indicators using an evidence-based approach. However, many tasks remain for continuous quality improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068505536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068505536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.028

DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.028

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068505536

VL - 28

SP - 2434

EP - 2441

JO - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

JF - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

SN - 1052-3057

IS - 9

ER -